rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 512
- 48
- Banned
- #81
ReillyT said:I appaud you on that thoughful, well-reasoned argument, and the certain conclusions which you are able to draw from this complex issue. It certainly gives me much to think about.
Thanks, but it's really just a list of facts.
me said:There is no constitutional prohibition against religious symbols on public property. This is a false meme perpetrated by an activist, religion hating, left wing judiciary that's gotten too big for it's britches. The truth will set you free.
Which fact do you "disagree" with?