The Sound of Settled Science

The problem is actually far worse than what Weatherman is pointing out here, since it is far more common than you realize, here is a blog site that post numerous examples:

Retraction Watch
Apparently the problem is not that bad at all, as this is proof of the self correcting system. Humans lie? Who knew...

It is clear you didn't read in the link. Too many times the damage is already done, the bad crap gets spread around in future papers.
 
The problem is actually far worse than what Weatherman is pointing out here, since it is far more common than you realize, here is a blog site that post numerous examples:

Retraction Watch
Apparently the problem is not that bad at all, as this is proof of the self correcting system. Humans lie? Who knew...

It is clear you didn't read in the link. Too many times the damage is already done, the bad crap gets spread around in future papers.
And then gets corrected. That's how you know about it.
 
The problem is actually far worse than what Weatherman is pointing out here, since it is far more common than you realize, here is a blog site that post numerous examples:

Retraction Watch
Apparently the problem is not that bad at all, as this is proof of the self correcting system. Humans lie? Who knew...

It is clear you didn't read in the link. Too many times the damage is already done, the bad crap gets spread around in future papers.
And then gets corrected. That's how you know about it.

Prove it!
 
I’m so old I remember when science findings were not published until peer reviewed.

31 unverified, unable to reproduce studies PUBLISHED. Forehead slapping time.

“A prominent cardiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston fabricated or falsified data in 31 published studies that should be retracted, officials at the institutions have concluded.

The cardiologist, Dr. Piero Anversa, produced research suggesting that damaged heart muscle could be regenerated with stem cells, a type of cell that can transform itself into a variety of other cells.

Although other laboratories could not reproduce his findings, the work led to the formation of start-up companies to develop new treatments for heart attacks and stroke, and inspired a clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Harvard Calls for Retraction of Dozens of Studies by Noted Cardiologist
An excellent example of the self correcting scientific process. This is what keeps frauds at bay, like evolution deniers and climate denier frauds.

How can you deny something that's not proven a fact?
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Now that is odd, you lying little ignorant fuck. Because I have not seen a single Scientific Society come out and say that. Nor a single National Academy of Science. Nor single major University anywhere in the world. In fact, all have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
 
I’m so old I remember when science findings were not published until peer reviewed.

31 unverified, unable to reproduce studies PUBLISHED. Forehead slapping time.

“A prominent cardiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston fabricated or falsified data in 31 published studies that should be retracted, officials at the institutions have concluded.

The cardiologist, Dr. Piero Anversa, produced research suggesting that damaged heart muscle could be regenerated with stem cells, a type of cell that can transform itself into a variety of other cells.

Although other laboratories could not reproduce his findings, the work led to the formation of start-up companies to develop new treatments for heart attacks and stroke, and inspired a clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Harvard Calls for Retraction of Dozens of Studies by Noted Cardiologist
An excellent example of the self correcting scientific process. This is what keeps frauds at bay, like evolution deniers and climate denier frauds.

How can you deny something that's not proven a fact?
The absorption spectra of the GHGs is a proven fact, you silly ass.
 
The problem is actually far worse than what Weatherman is pointing out here, since it is far more common than you realize, here is a blog site that post numerous examples:

Retraction Watch
Apparently the problem is not that bad at all, as this is proof of the self correcting system. Humans lie? Who knew...

It is clear you didn't read in the link. Too many times the damage is already done, the bad crap gets spread around in future papers.
And then gets corrected. That's how you know about it.

It has been FIVE days, yet no reply to my PROVE IT! request.

Snicker...……………….

The damage is already done and spread around before the bogus, fraud papers gets retracted. This was pointed out in the link YOU and Rockhead didn't bother to read.

Your feeble arguments are pathetic.
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Yet you fundamentalist still believe everything in a 2,000+ year old book printed, sold, read & believed more than any other regardless of any evidence.
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Now that is odd, you lying little ignorant fuck. Because I have not seen a single Scientific Society come out and say that. Nor a single National Academy of Science. Nor single major University anywhere in the world. In fact, all have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Every scientist and university that does not gain financials from the Gorebal Warming myth questions mans involvement in controlling the weather.
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Yet you fundamentalist still believe everything in a 2,000+ year old book printed, sold, read & believed more than any other regardless of any evidence.
Why wouldn’t anyone believe documents never shown to be inaccurate?
 
I’m so old I remember when science findings were not published until peer reviewed.

31 unverified, unable to reproduce studies PUBLISHED. Forehead slapping time.

“A prominent cardiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston fabricated or falsified data in 31 published studies that should be retracted, officials at the institutions have concluded.

The cardiologist, Dr. Piero Anversa, produced research suggesting that damaged heart muscle could be regenerated with stem cells, a type of cell that can transform itself into a variety of other cells.

Although other laboratories could not reproduce his findings, the work led to the formation of start-up companies to develop new treatments for heart attacks and stroke, and inspired a clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Harvard Calls for Retraction of Dozens of Studies by Noted Cardiologist
They did the same shit faking climate change
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Now that is odd, you lying little ignorant fuck. Because I have not seen a single Scientific Society come out and say that. Nor a single National Academy of Science. Nor single major University anywhere in the world. In fact, all have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Every scientist and university that does not gain financials from the Gorebal Warming myth questions mans involvement in controlling the weather.
OK, name them, you lying little ass.
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Yet you fundamentalist still believe everything in a 2,000+ year old book printed, sold, read & believed more than any other regardless of any evidence.
Why wouldn’t anyone believe documents never shown to be inaccurate?
Jericho was ruined and abandoned far before the Jews made their migration. Pi is not three.
 
I’m so old I remember when science findings were not published until peer reviewed.

31 unverified, unable to reproduce studies PUBLISHED. Forehead slapping time.

“A prominent cardiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston fabricated or falsified data in 31 published studies that should be retracted, officials at the institutions have concluded.

The cardiologist, Dr. Piero Anversa, produced research suggesting that damaged heart muscle could be regenerated with stem cells, a type of cell that can transform itself into a variety of other cells.

Although other laboratories could not reproduce his findings, the work led to the formation of start-up companies to develop new treatments for heart attacks and stroke, and inspired a clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Harvard Calls for Retraction of Dozens of Studies by Noted Cardiologist
They did the same shit faking climate change
Liar.
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Now that is odd, you lying little ignorant fuck. Because I have not seen a single Scientific Society come out and say that. Nor a single National Academy of Science. Nor single major University anywhere in the world. In fact, all have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Every scientist and university that does not gain financials from the Gorebal Warming myth questions mans involvement in controlling the weather.
OK, name them, you lying little ass.
Bjorn Lomborg
 
And who exposed the fraud? Other scientists. Science is self correcting. Unlike the dumb fucks on this board that are constantly trying to denigrate all scientists by the actions of a few that were exposed as frauds by other scientists. And, quite obviously, you title is meant to cast doubt on all scientific research, especially those studying the climate. However, those that actually read science, recognize your intent, and reject your hypothesis that no science is to be trusted.
After THIRTY ONE FAKE PAPERS.

But you’re right, science does self correct. Nobody believes in the Gorebal Warming myth anymore.
Yet you fundamentalist still believe everything in a 2,000+ year old book printed, sold, read & believed more than any other regardless of any evidence.
Why wouldn’t anyone believe documents never shown to be inaccurate?
Jericho was ruined and abandoned far before the Jews made their migration. Pi is not three.
Don’t know much about archeology either I see.

And thanks for the smiley faces. As a comedian I covet them.
 
The problem is actually far worse than what Weatherman is pointing out here, since it is far more common than you realize, here is a blog site that post numerous examples:

Retraction Watch
Apparently the problem is not that bad at all, as this is proof of the self correcting system. Humans lie? Who knew...

It is clear you didn't read in the link. Too many times the damage is already done, the bad crap gets spread around in future papers.
And then gets corrected. That's how you know about it.

Prove it!
The fact that you know about it, as it was correct, is the proof. Pay attention!
 
Why wouldn’t anyone believe documents never shown to be inaccurate?
Because it would be utterly irrational and dumb to do so, on that basis alone. The fact that you do not immediately understand this is a good demonstration of your fundamental and complete misunderstanding of science and lack of any grasp of logic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top