The right wing is thirsty for extremism

please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?


You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.


You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.
 
please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?


You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.


You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.

I think we should take $500 Million of Pelosis money and split it evenly among all USMB members.
 
yeah stupid jokes will stop this mess you are creating for Caplitalism in the US
 
please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?


You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.


You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.

No one is pushing wealth to the top. People at the top are earning it. And in the grand scheme, the entire country got rich as shit off capitalism. In the global market, our system made us so fucking rich that our poor people have an obesity problem, and our poor are amongst the 5% richest humans on Earth.

It's the mere envy of our lower class towards the upper class that is causing all the problems.

But keep supporting socialism and communism. Eventually, our country WON'T be any richer than the rest of the world, and our "poor" will truly be poor, like Nigerian or Indonesian poor, not like Oklahoma or Ohio poor.

There is a reason that Envy is one of the deadly sins. You left wingers need to stop practicing it.
 
They are just more worthy huh?


Have you ever heard the saying it takes money to make money?
 
The things that we view as entitlements and we shrink from cutting are things that one hundred years ago no citizen would have thought appropriate for the federal government to be doing. Jefferson and most of the other founders felt that a mans money was as inviolable has his life since he came by his earnings through the sweat and toil of his own labor. Now, the left thinks nothing of instigating class warfare against the "rich." And, the "rich" is always some nebulous "them" who are the source of "our" problems.

edit: before someone decides to twist what I am saying to suit some other purpose, I am not talking about the Wall Street bankers, the Golman Sachs leeches. They can all be lined up against a wall and shot for all I care. I am talking about government's need to create a nebulous, nameless enemy that is the source of "our" problems. The "rich" are always a ripe target. Of course, the "rich" are always nameless. They have to remain nameless. It wouldn't do to have a face, an identity, a humanity attached to them. They have to be seen as separate and worthy of scorn. Seen as not one of "our" tribe.
 
Last edited:
Your party is killing capitalism with their attack on the vast majority of Americans lives.

So attacking socialism is what kills capitalism?

It's strange how, according to the lefties, every move towards capitalism only reinforces socialism
 
Sorry I did post that in the wrong thread.

The real issue here is why are you supporting historically failed ideas that are causing Americans to turn away from capitalism?

ROFL! The socialist is attacking someone for supporting failed ideas?

What a hoot!
 
You are not attacking socialism you are attacking the things that created a healthy middle class in America
 
An "attack" is to physically attempt to harm someone or to literally take their private property from them.

An "attack" is not defined as no longer giving someone something for free. If I've been feeding my neighbor's dog for 1 month for free....then stop feeding the dog for free...I'm not attacking the dog. I'm telling me neighbor "Feed your own damn dog."

Since when is the promotion of self-reliance an "attack"? If anything, we're promoting people's ability to be more free.

However, higher taxes would be closer to an "attack", as the government then is demanding more of your property be given over to the government, with the possibility of men with guns being sent to force cooperation with that confiscation.

So who is "attacking" people, and who is simply cutting off the free lunch?

Blood sucking tics view any attempt to remove the source of their nourishment as an "attack."
 
Perhaps you should have taken that up with the Bush Administration before its extremism created this Frankenstein government you're now attempting to blame on everyone but the people who created it.

I'd say America is about as extreme as I've ever seen it and I've been around for over 70 years observing it. What are you looking for, a Revolution? Be careful what you wish for?

Bush created welfare, SSI, medicare, medicaid, foodstamps, AFDC, SISA loans, free lunch programs, the War on Poverty, The Great Society, The New Deal, etc?

Who knew? He was one busy mo fo!

Idiotic! Like the rest of conservative wingnut logic. Obviously you don't have any problem spending billions of taxpayer dollar in an oil rich nation like Iraq. But the thought of spending any of it on people in this country sends you into fits. Of course, that would make sense to Conservative America - but whether anyone likes it or not, the Federal government is going to continue spending our money however, whenever and wherever it sees fit. Personally, I'm not particularly pleased that they've spent trillions thousands of miles away in a country populated with many who even now would be just as happy to see us dead. But typical Wingnut logic dictates that's not a problem either.

By the way for your edification - I worked for 56 years and paid FICA for every one of them. To the great uninformed out there FICA is synonymous with Social Security. So I don't consider all the money I've paid for all those years to be the government's money nor do I consider now that I'm getting some of it back that I'm getting welfare. For someone who seems so concerned about this subject, I'd think you'd be just a tad better informed about whose money it is.

And truth be known, all of it is taxpayers' money. The last time I checked the government isn't in business to make a profit - although many in government certainly do profit. But that probably doesn't bother you either. Bush's excesses are as responsible for this debauchery as is any other President who has ever held the office. And what I do know is that he left us with a trillion dollar war debt and gave billions of our tax dollars to the criminals on Wall Street so they could continue the fleecing of America - which you Conservatives seem to enjoy - probably because you don't have a clue about what's really going on or so it would seem.
 
Sorry I did post that in the wrong thread.

The real issue here is why are you supporting historically failed ideas that are causing Americans to turn away from capitalism?

ROFL! The socialist is attacking someone for supporting failed ideas?

What a hoot!

I am A CAPITALIST.


I have always been a capitalist.

You are the one who seems dead set on killing capitalism in the US.
 
The things that we view as entitlements and we shrink from cutting are things that one hundred years ago no citizen would have thought appropriate for the federal government to be doing. Jefferson and most of the other founders felt that a mans money was as inviolable has his life since he came by his earnings through the sweat and toil of his own labor. Now, the left thinks nothing of instigating class warfare against the "rich." And, the "rich" is always some nebulous "them" who are the source of "our" problems.

Of course, hot women have found a way around the problem of mens money being inviolable.
 
please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?

You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.

You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.


No one pushes wealth to the top except liberals and their crony version of capitalism.
 
please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?

You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.

You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.

So how should we promote capitalism, by confiscating the profits of all corporations? A 90% marginal tax rate for all income over 100K?

What's your prescription?
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


so now its the left doing this huh?


Please outline what left policy is responsible for this push of wealth to the top?
 
please show how this move in America to push the wealth to the top is supported by any socialist?


You see those historically failed ideas you keep pushing are being outed for what they are and Americans are starting to think caplitalism does not work to make life better for Americans.


You want to save caplitalism and ward off socialim?

stop pushing all the wealth to the top.

Stealing all the wealth doesn't work. History shows this. Stop supporting it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top