The republicans want to raise your taxes

This is a perfect example of damned if you do and damned if you don't.

The left is the party of no principles.

When you have none you're free to criticise everything.

When you have them anyone can take pot-shots at you.

If your idea of a principle is raising taxes on the working poor, then I am happy to agree with you that we liberals do not have that principle.

Raising taxes on the working poor???

Like cigarette taxes, liquor taxes, every sin tax you can imagine? Those kinds of tax increases? How about the taxes on tanning booths?

Obama raised 8 different taxes in his first year. All of them effect the poor.

So STFU

The somebody in the GOP floats an idea and you fuckers nail them all with blanket accusations and generalities. But when Obama has already done it you ignore it totally, so fucken spare me your incepid whining!!!
 
Last edited:
Obama: 'I refuse to renew' Bush tax cuts for rich
President Obama said flatly today he would block renewal of George W. Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy when they expire at the end of 2012 (the year he is up for re-election).

"I refuse to renew them again," Obama said during his speech today on reducing the federal debt.
When Obama caves in and extends them, remember this.

"We don't believe that raising taxes is the answer here," said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va.
You were saying?

Republicans said they will battle to maintain tax rates for all Americans.

"The one area that we know we're not going to get very far on is the idea that we're going to raise taxes on the very people that we expect to invest in our economy and to help create jobs," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.
You were saying???
 
Raising taxes on the working poor???

Like cigarette taxes, liquor taxes, every sin tax you can imagine? Those kinds of tax increases? How about the taxes on tanning booths?

Obama raised 8 different taxes in his first year. All of them effect the poor.

So STFU

And if a poor person doesn't smoke or drink or go to a fake n bake .. then what? Uh oh! No tax increase!

Well, at least not until the GOP get their way.
 
Raising taxes on the working poor???

Like cigarette taxes, liquor taxes, every sin tax you can imagine? Those kinds of tax increases? How about the taxes on tanning booths?

Obama raised 8 different taxes in his first year. All of them effect the poor.

So STFU

And if a poor person doesn't smoke or drink or go to a fake n bake .. then what? Uh oh! No tax increase!

Well, at least not until the GOP get their way.

So... higher taxes on things tens of million... No hundreds of millions of Americans use is all of a sudden "not raising taxes" because they can all of a out of nowhere opt to not buy these things they have been for years?

If they do more taxes on gas does that not count because you can opt to not drive lol?
 
I have a great idea and dumbasfuck will love it because it's super duper off the top of my head! No, it's not building and selling windmills, it's better! This tax will go to ANY rich person that makes over 1 million a year!!!!!!

A 100% tax on rich people that buy a HOUSE! Any rich person that buys a house gets a 100% tax!
Limit to a home being bought for 30,000$ or less, no tax change on a house costing over 30,000$ or more for a rich person making over 1 million a year.
 
GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block - CBS News


At issue is a tax that the vast majority of workers pay, but many don't recognize because they don't read, or don't understand their pay stubs. Workers normally pay 6.2 percent of their wages toward a tax designated for Social Security. Their employer pays an equal amount, for a total of 12.4 percent per worker.

As part of a bipartisan spending deal last December, Congress approved Obama's request to reduce the workers' share to 4.2 percent for one year; employers' rate did not change. Obama wants Congress to extend the reduction for an additional year. If not, the rate will return to 6.2 percent on Jan. 1.

Obama cited the payroll tax in his weekend radio and Internet address Saturday, when he urged Congress to work together on measures that help the economy and create jobs. "There are things we can do right now that will mean more customers for businesses and more jobs across the country. We can cut payroll taxes again, so families have an extra $1,000 to spend," he said.

I thought Obama wanted "everyone" to have "skin in the game"?


What skin do billionaires have in the game?

Are they paying taxes? Do they pay "payroll" taxes? Are they responsible for their employees?

If you want people to pay extra taxes, then let EVERYBODY pay. If you get extra money back from the government after filing taxes, you should have that amount reduce by the amount other rates are increased. Maybe after that happened, people would open their eyes to the real issue: government overspending.
 
The 'nuts are trying to claim this won't be a tax hike if the GOP lets it expire?

But last December, these same people were calling it an Obama tax hike if he let the Bush tax cuts expire.

Oops.
 
Republicans want to kill things that help the middle class like Social Security and Medicare and cut things like taxes for the rich and the EPA.

They only represent the rich and powerful.
 
I think come next election we should fire a bunch of these paid off politicians. also puts some new law into effect that cuts there benefits for retirement to down to 25 percent or less.
also any politicians that has spent one nickel of my tax dollars for personal use should get jail time and lose all there benefits.
WE NEED TO SHOW THESE DUMB ASS PUBLIC SERVANTS THAT THEY WORK FOR US!
 
GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block - CBS News


At issue is a tax that the vast majority of workers pay, but many don't recognize because they don't read, or don't understand their pay stubs. Workers normally pay 6.2 percent of their wages toward a tax designated for Social Security. Their employer pays an equal amount, for a total of 12.4 percent per worker.

As part of a bipartisan spending deal last December, Congress approved Obama's request to reduce the workers' share to 4.2 percent for one year; employers' rate did not change. Obama wants Congress to extend the reduction for an additional year. If not, the rate will return to 6.2 percent on Jan. 1.

Obama cited the payroll tax in his weekend radio and Internet address Saturday, when he urged Congress to work together on measures that help the economy and create jobs. "There are things we can do right now that will mean more customers for businesses and more jobs across the country. We can cut payroll taxes again, so families have an extra $1,000 to spend," he said.



AND yet your article can't cite even ONE Republican who has come out saying they are FOR eliminating the reduction in the payroll tax?:cuckoo:
 
Social Security payroll taxes apply only to the first $106,800 of a worker's wages. Therefore, $2,136 is the biggest benefit anyone can gain from the one-year reduction.

The great majority of Americans make less than $106,800 a year. Millions of workers pay more in payroll taxes than in federal income taxes.

The 12-month tax reduction will cost the government about $120 billion this year, and a similar amount next year if it's renewed.

That worries Rep. David Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, and a member of the House-Senate supercommittee tasked with finding new deficit cuts. Tax reductions, "no matter how well-intended," will push the deficit higher, making the panel's task that much harder, Camp's office said.
But Republican lawmakers haven't always worried about tax cuts increasing the deficit. They led the fight to extend the life of a much bigger tax break: the major 2001 income tax reduction enacted under Bush. It was scheduled to expire at the start of this year. Obama campaigned on a pledge to end the tax break only for the richest Americans, but solid GOP opposition forced him to back down.

Many Republicans are adamant about not raising taxes but largely silent on what it would mean to let the payroll tax break expire.

Republicans cite key differences between the two "temporary" taxes, starting with the fact that the Bush measure had a 10-year life from the start. To stimulate job growth, these lawmakers say, it's better to reduce income tax rates for people and for companies than to extend the payroll tax break.

The Associated Press: GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block
 
GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block - CBS News


At issue is a tax that the vast majority of workers pay, but many don't recognize because they don't read, or don't understand their pay stubs. Workers normally pay 6.2 percent of their wages toward a tax designated for Social Security. Their employer pays an equal amount, for a total of 12.4 percent per worker.

As part of a bipartisan spending deal last December, Congress approved Obama's request to reduce the workers' share to 4.2 percent for one year; employers' rate did not change. Obama wants Congress to extend the reduction for an additional year. If not, the rate will return to 6.2 percent on Jan. 1.

Obama cited the payroll tax in his weekend radio and Internet address Saturday, when he urged Congress to work together on measures that help the economy and create jobs. "There are things we can do right now that will mean more customers for businesses and more jobs across the country. We can cut payroll taxes again, so families have an extra $1,000 to spend," he said.



AND yet your article can't cite even ONE Republican who has come out saying they are FOR eliminating the reduction in the payroll tax?:cuckoo:

"We don't need short-term gestures. We need long-term fundamental changes in our tax structure and our regulatory structure that people who create jobs can rely on," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., when asked about the payroll tax matter.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., "has never believed that this type of temporary tax relief is the best way to grow the economy," said spokesman Brad Dayspring.

The Associated Press: GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block
 
GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block - CBS News


At issue is a tax that the vast majority of workers pay, but many don't recognize because they don't read, or don't understand their pay stubs. Workers normally pay 6.2 percent of their wages toward a tax designated for Social Security. Their employer pays an equal amount, for a total of 12.4 percent per worker.

As part of a bipartisan spending deal last December, Congress approved Obama's request to reduce the workers' share to 4.2 percent for one year; employers' rate did not change. Obama wants Congress to extend the reduction for an additional year. If not, the rate will return to 6.2 percent on Jan. 1.

Obama cited the payroll tax in his weekend radio and Internet address Saturday, when he urged Congress to work together on measures that help the economy and create jobs. "There are things we can do right now that will mean more customers for businesses and more jobs across the country. We can cut payroll taxes again, so families have an extra $1,000 to spend," he said.



AND yet your article can't cite even ONE Republican who has come out saying they are FOR eliminating the reduction in the payroll tax?:cuckoo:

"We don't need short-term gestures. We need long-term fundamental changes in our tax structure and our regulatory structure that people who create jobs can rely on," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., when asked about the payroll tax matter.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., "has never believed that this type of temporary tax relief is the best way to grow the economy," said spokesman Brad Dayspring.

The Associated Press: GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block

neither of which state they are FOR eliminating the reduction.

The first one specifically states 'never believed that this type of temporary tax relief is the best way to grow the economy'. Doesn't say he's FOR eliminating it... says it's not the best way to grow the economy.

The second one specifically states 'We don't need short-term gestures. We need long-term fundamental changes in our tax structure and our regulatory structure that people who create jobs can rely on'. Again, doesn't say he's FOR eliminating it... says we need long term measures and regulatory stabilization that corporations can rely on in order to grow the economy.

You're hanging out with TM too much. Her stupidity is rubbing off on you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top