The reasons to impeach Obama!

You are a lying bastard

He is a Commie Muslim Kenyan not worthy of leading a Christian nation

any evidence ???

Evidence?

Obama is hiding the evidence......what more evidence do you need?

Impeach the Kenyan
I am unsure what Ed's problem is. Not being able to believe the muslim stuff. Hell, there are tons of repubs out there who firmly believe it. They have meetings. Hell, I am trying to get the tin hat concession. cmon, Ed. You know you love these true repubs. They believe in the muslim truth. They are sure. And they are going to buy my tin hats, in large numbers.
 
any evidence ???

Evidence?

Obama is hiding the evidence......what more evidence do you need?

Impeach the Kenyan
I am unsure what Ed's problem is. Not being able to believe the muslim stuff. Hell, there are tons of repubs out there who firmly believe it. They have meetings. Hell, I am trying to get the tin hat concession. cmon, Ed. You know you love these true repubs. They believe in the muslim truth. They are sure. And they are going to buy my tin hats, in large numbers.

there are tons of libs who spied for Stalin and who think taxing the economy will help it grow!! What does that tell you?? Notice how substance is the liberal's enemy. You come a long ways when you happy to engage people about Reagans tax increases. What happened to the libs confidence??
 
Last edited:
there are tons of libs who think taxing the economy will help it grow!!
Yeah, remember when I35W fell down because republicans wanted to cut corners? Thats the opposite of growth, attempting to contradict me on this one will only label you as an adherant to the broken window fallacy.

You come a long ways when you happy to engage people about Reagans tax increases. What happened to the libs confidence??

What? Yes, reagan cut taxes on the rich and raised taxes in a flat manner, this redistribution of wealth is more commonly known as class warfare. Whats the biggest hit to a small company's bottom line? Wage tax. Howd it get so high? Reagan.
 
Howd it get so high? Reagan.

actually Obama is president now!! What planet are you on?????
Hur dur dur, a temporary tax cut expiring is not the same thing as it being raised. your mom said you could have some icecream, not that you could have infinite icecream forever, fatty.

reagan is the one who raised it this high in the first place, and its the current congress that is standing in the way of obama making that tax cut permanent.




Yeah, remember when I35W fell down because republicans wanted to cut corners? .

any evidence or just a typical liberal lie???

Phone call put brakes on bridge repair | StarTribune.com

"Hey, that bridge is gonna fall down, should we fix it? Naaaaaah" -republicans
 
Yeah, remember when I35W fell down because republicans wanted to cut corners? .

any evidence or just a typical liberal lie???[/QUOTE]

Phone call put brakes on bridge repair | StarTribune.com

"Hey, that bridge is gonna fall down, should we fix it? Naaaaaah" -republicans[/QUOTE]

His article does not mention Republicans or Democrats let alone blame them. Typical liberal liar!!!


Moreover, the NTSB investigation did not come close to blaming them Republicans or Democrats:The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, was the inadequate load capacity, due to a design error by Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., of the gusset plates at the U10 nodes, which failed under a combination of (1) substantial increases in the weight of the bridge, which resulted from previous bridge modifications, and (2) the traffic and concentrated construction loads on the bridge on the day of the collapse. Contributing to the design error was the failure of Sverdrup & Parcel’s quality control procedures to ensure that the appropriate main truss gusset plate calculations were performed for the I-35W bridge and the inadequate design review by Federal and State transportation officials. Contributing to the accident was the generally accepted practice among Federal and State transportation officials of giving inadequate attention to gusset plates during inspections for conditions of distortion, such as bowing, and of excluding gusset plates in load rating analyses.

Before determining that the collapse of the I-35W bridge initiated with failure of the gusset plates at the U10 nodes, the Safety Board considered a number of potential explanations. The following factors were considered, but excluded, as being causal to the collapse: corrosion damage in gusset plates at the L11 nodes, fracture of a floor truss, preexisting cracking, temperature effects, and pier movement.
The following safety issues were identified in this investigation:
Insufficient bridge design firm quality control procedures for designing bridges, and insufficient Federal and State procedures for reviewing and approving bridge design plans and calculations.
Lack of guidance for bridge owners with regard to the placement of construction loads on bridges during repair or maintenance activities.
Exclusion of gusset plates in bridge load rating guidance.
Lack of inspection guidance for conditions of gusset plate distortion.
Inadequate use of technologies for accurately assessing the condition of gusset plates on deck truss bridges.
As a result of this accident investigation, the Safety Board makes recommendations to the Federal Highway Administration and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. One safety recommendation resulting from this investigation was issued to the Federal Highway Administration in January 2008.
 
Highway and Street Construction, Except Elevated Highways market report | HighBeam Business: Arrive Prepared

Compromise among Congress, the Bush administration, and industry advocates led to a $4.4 billion reduction in highway funding in 2002.

"Hey guys, we know you have bridges you want to fix, but lets cut funding for that by 15%."

And how about the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which specifically addressed our ailing infrastructure and created jobs at the same time, which republicans unanimously voted down? (albeit in a futile, empty gesture)


why not say what tax you want and why?????
glad you asked. by taxing the upper tiers of income sufficiently, we can ease the tax burden on the working class. Where the rich are likely to invest their money, the middle class is prone to spend it. spending fuels demand, demand causes hiring, hiring ends the recession. more lending only helps when we dont have enough, we have plenty as is.

the wage tax is anti businesses in the way it is structured as it is based on expenses, not on profits; cut that in half and make up the difference with a hike on corporate earnings. This free's businesses up to take a gamble and hire some people, rather than need to wait for that sure thing to come along.
 
I love America

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3nmLRUvtrg"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3nmLRUvtrg[/ame]

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
CRAZY RADIO​
 
1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

Does that include the $4 trillion cost of the republican wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the $11 trillion he inherited from Bush?

If you have to use half the truth to make your point, it suggests your point is, well, pointless.

I love it when people refer to it as that. It was voted in by both parties. So, you are using "half truths". We already know the kettle is black. 11 trillion? Wtf are you talking about?

No.

This was a total and unmitigated move on the part of Conservatives to make war on a country they wanted to control for their oil.

This is owned by both the Republican party and conservative.
 
1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

Does that include the $4 trillion cost of the republican wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the $11 trillion he inherited from Bush?

If you have to use half the truth to make your point, it suggests your point is, well, pointless.

what half truth??? What ever the debt is and who ever caused it, the Republicans want to eliminate it while libturds just want to go deeper and deeper in debt thus exacerbating all of our economic problems!! This is what you'd expect from those who spied for Stalin and voted to the left of Bernie Sanders.
 
1) we are $16 trillion in debt; headed to $50 trillion and he wants to eliminate the debt ceiling because as a communist who voted to the left of Bernie Sanders he does not mind bankrupting the country he hates.


2) Obama is so desperate to callously spend our money, money we won't give him, and money he won't dare ask for in new taxes, he has virtually ordered the Fed to print all the money he needs. In fact, 70% of his recent record breaking very liberal deficits have been paid for with money that his obedient Treasury department has printed!!

Even Greece, the very best example of modern socialist profligacy, has a strict debt ceiling and absolutely no ability to print money in secret as Obama does.

Does that include the $4 trillion cost of the republican wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the $11 trillion he inherited from Bush?

If you have to use half the truth to make your point, it suggests your point is, well, pointless.

what half truth??? What ever the debt is and who ever caused it, the Republicans want to eliminate it while libturds just want to go deeper and deeper in debt thus exacerbating all of our economic problems!! This is what you'd expect from those who spied for Stalin and voted to the left of Bernie Sanders.

For the last 30 years deficits have consistently increased under red presidencies and shrunk under democrats (yes even obama). This isnt a sudden realization that deficits are bad, republicans knew all along, this was their plan to sabotage America.
Starve the beast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Of he started a war based on and's that don't exist, I would say impeach him.
 
For the last 30 years deficits have consistently increased under red presidencies and shrunk under democrats (yes even obama).

This is because they followed blue presidents. Didn't the Bush economy free Barry from any responsibility for the on-going recession as liberals love to claim????? Didn't Clinton inherit a boom for Bush 41.


See why we are positive a liberal will be slow??
 
Two can play this game.

I dont hear anything about how great the economy was under bush sr obviously because he followed reagan. and reagan only did half decent because he followed carter; Ill take any of reagans successes and attribute them to carter, while heaping all of reagans many failures on reagan. clintons economy makes the 20 years of republican presidencies flanking him look like mewling peasants though.
 
Two can play this game.

I dont hear anything about how great the economy was under bush sr obviously because he followed reagan. and reagan only did half decent because he followed carter; Ill take any of reagans successes and attribute them to carter, while heaping all of reagans many failures on reagan. clintons economy makes the 20 years of republican presidencies flanking him look like mewling peasants though.

so then you agree:

1) the president in not the entire government
2) the economy moves in 10 year cycles impervious to any government let alone any president


therefore it was stupid for you to say blue state presidents did better than red state presidents. Sorry
 

Forum List

Back
Top