The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Absolutely nuts.

Whats really nuts and treasonous is the Green New Deal Second Great Depression and Communist Revolution, open borders, free medical care for entire world.

And you probably think global warming is a hoax. You're just dangerous you're so misinformed. And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal and I would like to try that. Everything by choice of course. Nothing about doing away with internal combustion cars at least.Or the other fear-mongering you've had....

And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal

Lots of wasted money and low-productivity jobs.

 

[francoHFW]

Absolutely nuts.

Whats really nuts and treasonous is the Green New Deal Second Great Depression and Communist Revolution, open borders, free medical care for entire world.

And you probably think global warming is a hoax. You're just dangerous you're so misinformed. And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal and I would like to try that. Everything by choice of course. Nothing about doing away with internal combustion cars at least.Or the other fear-mongering you've had....

And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal

Lots of wasted money and low-productivity jobs.

Why do you love pollution so much? And no fear mongering garbage.... The green New deal is actually high-paid tech jobs

 

[francoHFW]

Nothing about doing away with internal combustion cars at least.Or the other fear-mongering you've had....

Do you think its so easy to lie? Green New Deal does away with internal combustion!!! in 10 years.

Only the GOP propaganda machine says so oh, maybe a couple of fringe Democrats. The green New deal says what Congress and the president agrees to. They're not coming to take away your cars lol

 

[francoHFW]

And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal and I would like to try that.

Good money in socialist dictates at gunpoint???????????????? Socialism makes us poor not rich. Ever heard of Cuba/Florida, USA /USSR, Communist China/ Capitalist China???

Here is the list of Obama's Green New Deal! 100% failure!! Honestly, the problem with liberals is they are stupid. Sorry, but what other conclusion is possible?
Subj: Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*

Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy=

Pretty good record actually. Capitalism is tough. And China was dumping everything they could. Without it we would have no clean energy manufacturing. Boy you really have memorized all the garbage propaganda....Republicans used to be the silent majority, now they are the loudmouth majority. All cable news sucks and radio demagogues internet ditto. And those are communists not socialist you f****** idiot. Goodbye

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Absolutely nuts.

Whats really nuts and treasonous is the Green New Deal Second Great Depression and Communist Revolution, open borders, free medical care for entire world.

And you probably think global warming is a hoax. You're just dangerous you're so misinformed. And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal and I would like to try that. Everything by choice of course. Nothing about doing away with internal combustion cars at least.Or the other fear-mongering you've had....

And there's a hell of a lot of money and good jobs in the green New deal

Lots of wasted money and low-productivity jobs.

Why do you love pollution so much? And no fear mongering garbage.... The green New deal is actually high-paid tech jobs

Why do you love pollution so much?

Why do you hate the high standard of living that fossil fuels make possible?

The green New deal is actually high-paid tech jobs

Which low productivity jobs do you imagine are high-paid tech jobs? Post a list.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming gets 3 EVs. 1 Congressman and 2 Senators

Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population.

You are an idiot. Each state gets two Senators regardless of population. Somebody better tell John Barrasso and Mike Enzi that one of them is NOT a Senator from Wyoming.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming gets 3 EVs. 1 Congressman and 2 Senators

Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population.

You are an idiot. Each state gets two Senators regardless of population. Somebody better tell John Barrasso and Mike Enzi that one of them is NOT a Senator from Wyoming.

Each state gets two Senators regardless of population.

That's what I said, moron.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

No, you weren't, but you made a nice recovery.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

No, you weren't, but you made a nice recovery.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

This absolutely refuted his claim.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

No, you weren't, but you made a nice recovery.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

This absolutely refuted his claim.

I agree it is not 3 times, which was the original claim. My apologies!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

No, you weren't, but you made a nice recovery.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

This absolutely refuted his claim.

So, in your mind 600,000 = 736,000?

In my mind, 736,000 is not 3.5 times 600,000

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hmmm - after losing 10 million jobs in the last week, Trump may beat 'em all within the next 2-3 months.

If the Unemployment rate averaged 10% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 5.09%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 20% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 6.97%.
If the Unemployment rate averaged 30% for the rest of the year, Trump's average leaving office in January would be 8.84%.

thing is he's not leaving office in January
Average Joe American realizes the jobs lost is not due to the President policies

If your honest and objective, you would realize that any sitting President can be defeated regardless of the situation. Donald Trump's victory in 2016 was a weak one, losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. Donald Trump scraped together an electoral victory through victories by tiny margins in the 3 states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. So Donald Trump started off his presidency with rather weak support in January 1917. Since that time, his approval rating has averaged 40%, the lowest in history, and he was impeached by the House Of Representatives, and faced a trial for removal form office by the Senate. Now the current circumstances where the United States has become the epicenter for a global pandemic. Over a thousand people dying a day, and the threat that unemployment levels could exceed levels during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For a President starting out with a weak base of support, his chances do not look good for November 2020.

You aren't being honest Trump won 30 states and the popular vote of those 30 states
hopefully by the end of this virus blue state population will be decimated
Hows that for honesty?

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents? You have much to learn son.

The Election Came Down to 77,744 Votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan (Updated) - Washington Examiner

Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

So a state with 33 million residents is equal to a state with 500,000 residents?

Of course not. Wyoming has 3 electoral votes while California has 55.

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states which included THE LEAST POPULOUS?

Then WTF difference does it make that Dear Leader won 30 states

Because the 30 states he won had more electoral college votes than the 20 Hillary won.

Yep - Good ol' EC ... Our Last Vestige of Slavery in which acres vote instead of people and a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

Electoral College is 'vestige' of slavery, say some Constitutional scholars

A lesser-known part of the Electoral College's history: its relationship to slavery in the U.S.

www.pbs.org

acres vote instead of people

Liar.

a vote in Wyoming, Montana and Alaska carries triple the weight of a vote in New York or Texas.

That's not even close to true.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

Wyoming is 3 Electoral Votes. It is the lowest number possible, just like DC.

California has 55 Electoral Votes. It is the largest.

Where did I say otherwise? Link?

You said:
"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

"Wyoming doesn't get 2 Senators because of their population."

That's absolutely correct. Double their population, do they get more than 2 senators?
Cut the population in half, do they lose any senators?

No?

Then their Senators must be independent of their population.

You were not even including them in your electoral vote totals.

My totals?
California has 55 and Wyoming has 3.

Thank you! Be more careful next time.

I was very careful when I refuted right-winger's confusion about the weight of votes.

No, you weren't, but you made a nice recovery.

It is exactly true
600,000 votes in Wyoming gets you 3 EVs
200,000 each

40 million in California gets you 57 EVs
700,000 each

Nope. Wyoming gets 1 EV, and 1 House member, for the 600,000 in population.

In California, you get 53 EV, and 53 House members, for the 39 million in population.

736,000 each.

This absolutely refuted his claim.

So, in your mind 600,000 = 736,000?

In my mind, 736,000 is not 3.5 times 600,000

I edited this post.