The only Constitutional means to change the MEANING of the Constitution.

Where is the constitutional right to privacy listed? It not being listed doesn't change the fact that it exists.

They are certainly implied and have certainly been established by constitutional law. No fetal rights are either stated, implied, or established by constitutional law.

Do you realize you just made my, and Vanquish's, point? You are actually proving yourself to be quite capable fo making things up, twisting facts, and insisting that you are the only possible authority, thus proving yourself to be totally incorrect.

No. You have conveniently forgotten what my original point was, which is standard practice for you.
 
Doesn't it say something about life in there?

What the Constitution fails to do is define person, not protect the rights of unborn children, which is why it is legally murder to shoot a pregnant woman and kill that unborn child. Roe v Wade was about balancing the right of privacy of the mother over the right of the child. It was not about denying that the child had rights, if it was it would not have gotten into all that convoluted debate about viability.

Roe v. Wade, by establishing that women had the right to an abortion in the first trimester declares unequivocally that the 1st trimester fetus has no rights as a person. That Roe v. Wade leaves later term abortion in the hands of the state in reality also declares that later term fetuses have no constitutionally protected rights as persons, since the states can in fact make later term abortion legal.

No it does not.

Laci and Conner's Law (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate

All Roe v Wade does is give the mother's rights legal precedence over the unborn child, it does not eliminate any rights the child has.

Laci and Conner's Law does not give a fetus rights as a person. A law against killing an animal does not give the animal rights as a person. A law against chopping down a tree does not give the tree human rights.
 
Where is the constitutional right to privacy listed? It not being listed doesn't change the fact that it exists.

They are certainly implied and have certainly been established by constitutional law. No fetal rights are either stated, implied, or established by constitutional law.

Do you realize you just made my, and Vanquish's, point? You are actually proving yourself to be quite capable fo making things up, twisting facts, and insisting that you are the only possible authority, thus proving yourself to be totally incorrect.

Can you cite ANYTHING from the Constitution that implies that fetuses have rights as persons?
 

Forum List

Back
Top