red states rule
Senior Member
- May 30, 2006
- 16,011
- 573
- 48
Sanity has returned to SC - abortion may be gone sometime in the future
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So YOU are saying that I d&e's are NOT BANNED if they inject the baby SOMEHOW and kill it in the womb, then they can breach deliver and suck the brains out before full delivery and that the courts did NOT BAN intact delievery if they found a way to kill the baby by keeping it INTACT?
Show me in the ruling where it says such? ( hahaha, or did you do that already?)
And if this injection procedure is dangerous then why DO you say or act like it is a valid option for the woman?
I heard most all of the hearing on c-span and did not take note of such....?
The baby can be dismembered within the womb. Care is correct in that regard. It was specified in the law, all the court did was uphold the ban. The reason why the ruling was significant was because the Supreme Court allowed a federal ban on an abortion procedure. That means that it's possible Congress and the President can pass another ban on dismemberment inside the womb and possibly other restrictions.
Saline or prostaglandin abortions: These totaled about 1.5% of all abortions - perhaps 25,000 in a typical year. A needle is fed through the woman's abdomen into the liquid that surrounds the fetus. A saline solution, made of salt and water, is passed through the needle. The fetus dies of salt poisoning. Labor follows, and a dead fetus is delivered. The salt burns the skin of the fetus.
No1, there is NO procedure where a needle is injected in to the child to kill it.... Darla's link or comments that you are going by must be wrong...
There is a Saline Abortion but this usually takes place in the THIRD TRIMESTER, where as the IDE or IDX is performed 20-24 weeks in general....and some may be earlier if it is the insephalitis infection in the baby which swells the infants head abnormally.
here is the description of the saline abortion and this may be where you have gotten "injection" from....
It was the Supreme Court Case on Partial Birth Abortion.....they showed the case with just audio on c-span....(they showed you a picture of the Justice speaking and asking questions)
you can listen to it if you go to c-span, they have a link, so that you can hear the lawyers argue the case before them..... it was cool! and informative!
I heard most of it....missed maybe 10 minutes of it at the most.
and good morning no1!
care
oh red, you have misunderstood what No1 and I are speaking about...
I thoroughly understand that IDX (partial birth) abortion includes a siringe to suck the brains out.... and the whole procedure of this....
No1 mentioned to me in a previous post that women that were going to have an IDX that want to deliver and INTACT child, have ANOTHER method of abortion that would allow the woman to still have an INTACT delivery...something done with an injection to kill the child before the IDX abortion is done to suck the brains out.....
I disagreed with him. The most common procedure of abortion that is LEGAL in second trimester later term abortions is a D & E which requires the doctors to dismember the child to be in the mother's womb and most women that were going to have an IDX will now HAVE to use the D&E....dismemberment in the womb.....UNLESS the women want to have a cesarean section which is much more dangerous to the health of the mother and prevents her from having a natural birth in the future.
Most women that had no problems with their child to be but just want an abortion may not care about what procedure is used, the IDX or the D&E...
But the women that WANT their babies but have complications with their babies and MUST abort, will no longer have a choice to deliever their baby via partial birth abortion which delievers their child INTACT, where the mother can hold her dead child and mourn..... they are forced in to the D&E where their child to be is dismembered. This is where I disagree with the SC decision on health exception not being included.
I have been searching the net for two days now trying to find this abortion that Damo is speaking about that allows the woman with medical problems with her fetus, to deliver an intact fetus....haven't found any, as of yet....but I am still searching!
Care
You are fundamentally misunderstanding my position. The lawyer on the radio expressed that to continue doing I D&E they would need to inject the baby before the procedure, thus making it legal as the law only covers the position where the baby is killed, not the killing itself.
So, basically it wasn't done regularly, some women would request such an action beforehand if they were cognizant of the procedure beforehand, but instead of just doing the standard D&E they can inject beforehand then perfrom the Intact D&E so your mother would have the baby to mourn. Since the child would be deceased pre-procedure there would be no illegality in the Intact D&E.
The idea that you are going to find the prodedure as a current practice is a bit disingenuous. I am speaking to legality, not current practice.
Here's a little bit more information on that type of abortion. It's rarely done but despite the SCOTUS ruling that upholds the ban on partial birth abortion, this type of procedure is still legal.There is a Saline Abortion but this usually takes place in the THIRD TRIMESTER, where as the IDE or IDX is performed 20-24 weeks in general....and some may be earlier if it is the insephalitis infection in the baby which swells the infants head abnormally.
here is the description of the saline abortion and this may be where you have gotten "injection" from....
But no1, IF this is a procedure that HAS NOT EVER been done or is NOT used, how do you consider this a viable abortion option? I question this ONE doctor's opinion on this....
especially since there is NOTHING, NADA, NIENTE on the internet about this abortion procedure that kills the baby to be in the womb via a injection?
This doctors's hypothetical is not reality.
And yes, I would agree with this doctor's opinion on the SC ruling.....IF and that is a big IF a procedure could be developed that could kill the child in the womb, while keeping them intact, like an injection of some sort that would not harm the mother's health, then the I D&E could be used to deliver the child and they could still suck the brains out of the dead fetus so that delievery of the child to be would be less difficult with the smaller crushed head.
But as far as I can tell, there IS NO SUCH procedure?
Care
More like a nut case looking for attention
Bragging about your self again?
You seem to be rather paranoid - nothing new
he blindly supports the Party of Hate and won't listen to any other viewpoints- just like Bush. He blames all of Bush's lies and failures on "liberals". I think he's Sean Hannity's brother- all fluff and no substance.
You seem greatly stupid - nothing new.
So now you are claiming that liberals the equivlent of good intentions.
What next?
some of the posters here comtinue to defend Bush's crimes- they are the ones I'm talking about who have created their own Party of Hate.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public".
-Theodore Roosevelt, Republican president