Blisterfinger
Platinum Member
- May 15, 2021
- 5,865
- 2,386
- 938
Defend anything you have to say. Can't you read? Or you just don't want to lolI can’t what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Defend anything you have to say. Can't you read? Or you just don't want to lolI can’t what?
I can’t what?
I can’t what?
BS. The abuse of Asylum is EPIC and done on purpose by your CORRUPT PARTYThe admin is WITHIN the law, otherwise the opponent Rs would have won in a suit against them....
I defend everything I say. I was questioning one of your statements. You brought up the letter like you were making some great argument. I asked you to explain yourself and this is you dodging that and trying to me to explain a point I haven’t even made yet. You have us spiraling down the tunnel of stupid because you can’t back up your words. FunnyDefend anything you have to say. Can't you read? Or you just don't want to lol
How is showing your dodge making any kind of relevant point?
There is no dodge involved. The laptop story was censored. And it could have changed the election. 13% said they would not have voted for Biden. They would of had to cheat a lot harder if that happened.How is showing your dodge making any kind of relevant point?
At what age should we just let suspects go ?Nah. “Scumbags” is a shorthand reference for you filthy libtarded Democraps.
Accurate, too.
Funny that you can't explain how they censored the laptop and why? Yeah it is. Looks like a rigged electionI defend everything I say. I was questioning one of your statements. You brought up the letter like you were making some great argument. I asked you to explain yourself and this is you dodging that and trying to me to explain a point I haven’t even made yet. You have us spiraling down the tunnel of stupid because you can’t back up your words. Funny
Senator Rubio and I agree. You disagree. explain why, you can't, except your own ignorance. That is why you refuse. I get it.How is showing your dodge making any kind of relevant point?
Looks like Rubio is right and you and MSNBC are wrong. Lying, cheating Democrat hacks the lot of you.How is showing your dodge making any kind of relevant point?
More like another accusation by your party’s activist judges and prosecutors. You haven’t won shit.Another win for the good guys.
What a stupid non sequitur of a “question.”At what age should we just let suspects go ?
That’s bullshit and we all know it. There still isn’t anything criminal that’s been exposed or acted on from that laptop. It was a failed October surprise. SorryThere is no dodge involved. The laptop story was censored. And it could have changed the election. 13% said they would not have voted for Biden. They would of had to cheat a lot harder if that happened.
Who are you accusing of censoring the laptop? That’s your claim, why would I explain it for you?Funny that you can't explain how they censored the laptop and why? Yeah it is. Looks like a rigged election
I disagree because I haven’t seen any evidence to back up your claims. Show evidence and I’ll change my mind. But a letter from retired agents from both parties where they clearly state they don’t have intel that Russia was involved but they see earmarks and would be very cautious on how the info is taken…. That’s not censorship. You're gonna need more than thatSenator Rubio and I agree. You disagree. explain why, you can't, except your own ignorance. That is why you refuse. I get it.
I don’t know anything about what MSNBc is saying. But if you’re calling me a liar then back it up. What did I lie about?Looks like Rubio is right and you and MSNBC are wrong. Lying, cheating Democrat hacks the lot of you.
How did they do it? Explain pleaseWho are you accusing of censoring the laptop? That’s your claim, why would I explain it for you?
Me and Rubio. Explain to me why they put out that letter saying it was Russian disinformation please. Could it be because they didn't want to damage the bidens? Answer pleaseI disagree because I haven’t seen any evidence to back up your claims. Show evidence and I’ll change my mind. But a letter from retired agents from both parties where they clearly state they don’t have intel that Russia was involved but they see earmarks and would be very cautious on how the info is taken…. That’s not censorship. You're gonna need more than that