The New Government Approved Racists On The Left

I'm sure there are plenty of variables, but one thing I'm most sure of is that voters would have turned out in much greater numbers if the choice opposite of the moonbat messiah would have been a guy who was actually the opposite of the moonbat messiah.

Yet the republicrat elites wanted a "moderate" like their boy prince GWB, and far too many of us were sick to death of the neo-fascist Bush dynasty.

I myself figured an idiot along the lines of jimmy carter would usher in another Ronald Reagan or maybe something even better.

The end result was we ended up with worse that Carter, and a candidate in 2012 that somehow never won a significant percentage of republican support.

You know why the leftist media never attacked Romney till he was the "last man"?

Let the "moderates" tell us why.

That should be funny.
Our voting system is completely broken. Should be able to rank the candidates on a ballot instead of just picking one. This system we have allows a ballot to have 10 conservatives and one semi-socialist that none of the conservatives actually want, but because the 10 conservatives split the conservative vote the socialist wins. Romney won in part because of all the democrats that voted for him in the primaries. Funny? no, it's not funny.

Will we fix the system? Hell no the two parties would never allow it cause then we could vote for other candidates without our votes being a vote for the "other side."

No, I think things should go back to the original intent of the founders.

The Senators should be picked by state legislators.

The President should be selected by an uncorrupted electoral college.

The beauty pageant elections over the last 100 years have been a disaster.

I agree we should put the senate back into the hands of the states legislatures.

However, I challenge you to show where the founders decided federal elections must be run by the states using a system where you must only vote for one of a list of candidates and can't rank the candidates on the ballot.

Corrupted electoral college? Huh?
 
Our voting system is completely broken. Should be able to rank the candidates on a ballot instead of just picking one. This system we have allows a ballot to have 10 conservatives and one semi-socialist that none of the conservatives actually want, but because the 10 conservatives split the conservative vote the socialist wins. Romney won in part because of all the democrats that voted for him in the primaries. Funny? no, it's not funny.

Will we fix the system? Hell no the two parties would never allow it cause then we could vote for other candidates without our votes being a vote for the "other side."

No, I think things should go back to the original intent of the founders.

The Senators should be picked by state legislators.

The President should be selected by an uncorrupted electoral college.

The beauty pageant elections over the last 100 years have been a disaster.

I agree we should put the senate back into the hands of the states legislatures.

However, I challenge you to show where the founders decided federal elections must be run by the states using a system where you must only vote for one of a list of candidates and can't rank the candidates on the ballot.

Corrupted electoral college? Huh?

Well I can't accept your challenge.

I am not well enough read on the matter of the electoral college to debate it.

However at least we can both agree that the cults of personality and pageantry that involves current presidential elections disgraces the entire political system.

We don't elect qualified executives anymore.

We select whores.
 
No, I think things should go back to the original intent of the founders.

The Senators should be picked by state legislators.

The President should be selected by an uncorrupted electoral college.

The beauty pageant elections over the last 100 years have been a disaster.

I agree we should put the senate back into the hands of the states legislatures.

However, I challenge you to show where the founders decided federal elections must be run by the states using a system where you must only vote for one of a list of candidates and can't rank the candidates on the ballot.

Corrupted electoral college? Huh?

Well I can't accept your challenge.

I am not well enough read on the matter of the electoral college to debate it.

However at least we can both agree that the cults of personality and pageantry that involves current presidential elections disgraces the entire political system.

We don't elect qualified executives anymore.

We select whores.

He's just trying to appear intellectual.

He doesn't know about Google apparently.....
 
Barack Obama called Eric Cantor yesterday to urge him to push an immigration bill in the House. This after calling Republicans every kind of racist in the book.

Cantor told Obama where to go.

Democrats want to leave immigration up to Republicans because it is unpopular, and it gives them an opportunity to throw out the race-card daily.

Congressman Cantor Issues Statement On Phone Call With President Obama
WASHINGTON, D.C.
–
Earlier this afternoon, President Obama called Congressman Eric Cantor (VA-7) about immigration: "Today, President Obama called me to discuss his desire for comprehensive immigration reform. The President called me hours after he issued a partisan statement which attacked me and my fellow House Republicans and which indicated no sincere desire to work together. After five years, President Obama still has not learned how to effectively work with Congress to get things done. You do not attack the very people you hope to engage in a serious dialogue. I told the President the same thing I told him the last time we spoke. House Republicans do not support Senate Democrat's immigration bill and amnesty efforts, and it will not be considered in the House. I also reiterated to the President there are other issues where we can find common ground, build trust and get America working again. I hope the President can stop his partisan messaging, and begin to seriously work with Congress to address the issues facing working middle class Americans that are struggling to make ends meet in this economy."

Cantor blasts Obama over phone call on immigration reform | TheHill
 
illegalaliens_1.jpg


c07d9b4e-d8ab-4091-a3cb-ced38b87f0c4.jpg


JohnWaynePush1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Democrats are pushing immigration from behind the scenes, trying to trick Republicans into supporting it, just to piss off conservative voters.

California once was the most prosperous state in the country. Now it is billions of dollars in debt, jobs are leaving in droves, taxes are going through the roof, and the state is being flooded with Mexicans. If you want to know what went wrong in California, just look at the way Democrats have used a magnet of free health care to draw millions of them into the state to totally change it's demographics. They want to do the same thing to Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.

BlByB6YCcAAV0XD-2.jpg
 
Last edited:

True, but now we have government approved racism/bigotry.

A Connecticut college professor was caught on a student's cell phone ranting about how Republicans are the most evil people on Earth, that if they take the Senate in the next election, life as we know it will end:

14.png


There are a lot of people out there that do not want black people to vote, do not want Latinos to vote. Do not want old people to vote, or young people to vote. Because generally, people like you are liberal.

You want equality. You want racial equality. You want financial equality. You want to be able to use your education and go out into the world and make it better, but you’d also like to be able to get a job. All these things point toward being liberal.

Never ever in the history of the United States has it been so important to vote….

It's absolutely possible that the Republicans will take over the Senate as well as the House. And we will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens. I mean, colleges will start closing up if they, if these people have their way. They don't think money should go to giving you people dangerous ideas about how the world should be run.





Chances are, if this happened, this country just might go back to what it was before Obama.

Wouldn't that be terrible.......:eusa_shifty:
 
Last edited:
excuse me?

Are there racists out there? Hell yeah....

But I am not referring to the dirtbags that are found in ALL ideologies....

I am referring to POLITICIANS accusing opposing POLITICIANS as being against liberal ideas of a black president because he is black.

And, as expected, you divert to some redneck in the backwoods of Tennessee who has a bumper sticker that I, personally, would have removed if I had the chance.

How else do you explain wanting him to be a one term president before introducing ONE bill or policy?

Now you can say its NOT because of racism and no proof is required. I can say it IS because of racism and no proof required. The difference is I am willing to admit that it cant be ALL because of racism while you like to pretend that NONE of it could POSSIBLY be because of racism.

Do you see the difference? An absolute conclusion such as yours requires proof that you cannot possibly prove so stop saying it :D

Really?

Republicans wanting an openly liberal democratic president who vigorously campaigned against republican policies to be a one term president has to do with his race?

Its a possibility. You deny that any such possibility even exists without anything to back it.

That is one hell of a stretch. I would say that is far from genuine on your part and, at the very least, you are politically ignorant.

No its not its called a possibility. You claim its IMPOSSIBLE. Now THAT is a stretch

LMAO.....a republican wanting a liberal democratic President to be a one term president is unusual and must be attributed to his race.

That is quite pathetic...and quite immature as well.

Maybe but you cant say its because of his policy when I've shown you that he didnt introduce one policy when that was said. So take a guess
 
Because your opinion is solely based on politics, not on reality....

It's not based on politics either.

It's based on what that bed wetter is told too believe.

If one of us could hack the moonbat opinion pages like media matters and and put out strong endorsements of Ben Carson, bed wetters like swallowjizz would be posting here about what a great guy he is.

Instead swallowjizz is programmed to hate Ben Carson, and is programmed so that no synapses are allowed to follow a thought passage that might conclude that swallowjizz is a racist.

It's all about the programming, because we can see that these sniveling bed wetters are incapable of a single independent thought. Sheep have a better sense of individual awareness.

Ah it's PeterEater and his fag projection project again.

Well get your boyfriend's dick out of your ass so you can pull up chair and sit up like a man.

We get Dr. Ben Carson. He's the fellow you little fag bois can point too and go "See I like that guy..I'm not a racist!"

Except that Carson is certifiable. He vomits the same shit you guys do. Same with Cain and West.

You aren't involved in constructive criticism when you are calling people communists and nazis.

You are basically trolling.

And in your case? You are just trolling for dick.

^^^^^^^^^^ Supports gay marriage. :lol:
 
A Connecticut college professor was caught on a student's cell phone ranting about how Republicans are the most evil people on Earth, that if they take the Senate in the next election, life as we know it will end:



At least that asshole moron of a professor was forced to apologize. There is 0% chance he meant it, but at least he was brought to heel.
 

Forum List

Back
Top