The Need To Destroy America

[FJO]

Ranting longer doesn't make your rant have value.

Shit is shit and crazy is crazy.

Fatty makes no sense. I'd like to see one of you morons explain what she's even talking about.

Your inspiration for your post was, obviously, your mirror.

 

[Katzndogz]

Liberals are going to launch into a personal attack every time they don't have a substantive answer. If they don't have a cause to attack, they make one up.

Face the facts, this country is on it's way down and out. We might argue over the reasons, but nothing is going to change the disintegration.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Didn't Bush justify the invasion of Iraq by citing UN sanction violations by Saddam?

The ONLY liberal response so far that wasn't nothing more than a fresh steaming pile of dog dump.

The answer to the best of my knowledge is yes, that and WMD's, which all parties involved admitted Sadam had.

But he didn't have any.

The point is, when people who on one page vilify the United Nations as the great Satan of the coming apocalyptic globalism,

and then on another page are waving around a UN seal of approval of your nation's actions when it happens to suit your agenda,

well,

you look silly.

 

[liarintheWH]

It's amazing you can put down your fork and knife long enough to write these dopey rants.

Or do you write them while on the can?

Seeing as how concerned about my weight....this is me without the Big Mac:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/sports/184808-finally-gettin-up-in-the-world.html


And....now you?

Looking good! Those rock walls are tough, good job. If I had to guess, hazlnut is HIDEOUS looking.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is the OP citing Francis Fukuyama, the repentant ex-neocon, because of his wisdom and insight?

The Fukuyama who said in 2008

"It is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of George W. Bush."


that Fukuyama?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How big is too big, as far as sovereignty goes?

Is this thread another defense of the right of secession, albeit in a very subtle manner?

 

[007]

Didn't Bush justify the invasion of Iraq by citing UN sanction violations by Saddam?

The ONLY liberal response so far that wasn't nothing more than a fresh steaming pile of dog dump.

The answer to the best of my knowledge is yes, that and WMD's, which all parties involved admitted Sadam had.

But he didn't have any.

The point is, when people who on one page vilify the United Nations as the great Satan of the coming apocalyptic globalism,

and then on another page are waving around a UN seal of approval of your nation's actions when it happens to suit your agenda,

well,

you look silly.

He didn't have any by the time we invaded is what you mean.

He DID have WMD's. We know because he USED them on his own people.

The UN can be completely dissolved as far as I'm concerned. I think it's a worthless bunch of little junior hitlers thinking they can tell the rest of the world what to do according to their agenda. Doesn't work that way.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Liberals are going to launch into a personal attack every time they don't have a substantive answer. If they don't have a cause to attack, they make one up.

Face the facts, this country is on it's way down and out. We might argue over the reasons, but nothing is going to change the disintegration.

I make substantive arguments against PC's points, such as they are, all the time.

Almost invariably she responds with ad hominem attacks, in lieu of substantive rebuttals.

 

[g5000]

And what, exactly, is underway to transform America into a "subordinate state"?

.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hazlnut never has much to add, does she?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is the OP citing Francis Fukuyama, the repentant ex-neocon, because of his wisdom and insight?

The Fukuyama who said in 2008

"It is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of George W. Bush."


that Fukuyama?

Are you working on your moron act? Dubya sucked, what the big surprise?

 

[007]

And what, exactly, is underway to transform America into a "subordinate state"?

.

Can you buy a 32oz. soft drink in NYC?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The ONLY liberal response so far that wasn't nothing more than a fresh steaming pile of dog dump.

The answer to the best of my knowledge is yes, that and WMD's, which all parties involved admitted Sadam had.

But he didn't have any.

The point is, when people who on one page vilify the United Nations as the great Satan of the coming apocalyptic globalism,

and then on another page are waving around a UN seal of approval of your nation's actions when it happens to suit your agenda,

well,

you look silly.

He didn't have any by the time we invaded is what you mean.

He DID have WMD's. We know because he USED them on his own people.

The UN can be completely dissolved as far as I'm concerned. I think it's a worthless bunch of little junior hitlers thinking they can tell the rest of the world what to do according to their agenda. Doesn't work that way.

I'm not going to re-litigate an argument I've won dozens of times, sorry.

GW Bush admitted that Iraq did not have WMDs; that declaration against interests is conclusive evidence that closes the case.

 

[FJO]

Liberals have always intended to destroy the United States. We are too concerned with individual rights that suppress public needs. We are arrogant and violent. We have spread our filthy culture all over the world bringing big macs and Starbucks everywhere we go.

Why is "The Post American World" obama's favorite book?

Why is "To Kill A Mockingbird" his favorite movie?

I don't think TPAW is his favorite. The Communist Mannifesto might be. His favorite document is "Rules For Radicals".

Actually it might be "Das Capital" by his hero, Karl Marx.

 

[NYcarbineer]

And what, exactly, is underway to transform America into a "subordinate state"?

.

Spending billions militarily defending other countries' interests, while those countries use the savings they get from that - from not having to defend themselves - to better their nations in other areas,

many of which make them more economically competitive against us.

 

[g5000]

And what, exactly, is underway to transform America into a "subordinate state"?

.

Can you buy a 32oz. soft drink in NYC?

That's an internal problem. Did China dictate 16 oz Cokes in NYC, or was it some dumbshit mayor?


.

 

[g5000]

And what, exactly, is underway to transform America into a "subordinate state"?

.

Spending billions militarily defending other countries' interests, while those countries use the savings they get from that - from not having to defend themselves - to better their nations in other areas,

many of which make them more economically competitive against us.

So every President since World War I has been seeking to transform America into a "subordinate state"? That's when we started with foreign aid.

That's funny. Our standing on the world stage has been greatly amplified since WWI. Our largesse had a great deal to with that.

Giving money to another country does not affect my right to bear arms or free speech or a trial by a jury of my peers.

Try again.



.

 

[Oldguy]

c. Liberal democratic sovereignties, e.g., the United States

LIBERAL? OMG, say it ain't so!

 

[Duped]

Is the OP citing Francis Fukuyama, the repentant ex-neocon, because of his wisdom and insight?

The Fukuyama who said in 2008

"It is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of George W. Bush."


that Fukuyama?

I can't stand George W. Bush - he paved the way for the Marxist peice of shit we have to deal with now!

 

[FJO]

Liberals are going to launch into a personal attack every time they don't have a substantive answer. If they don't have a cause to attack, they make one up.

Face the facts, this country is on it's way down and out. We might argue over the reasons, but nothing is going to change the disintegration.

Yes, that is what liberals do. I learned that from a key-note speech delivered by a gracious lady, Jane Kirkpatrick, at the Republican Convention, many years ago:

"THEY ALWAYS BLAME AMERICA FIRST!"

They did then and they still do.

But America is NOT on its way down. Things may look gloomy, with the socialist prick in the White House, but remember, it all goes in cycles. The disintegration caused by this worthless half black traitor is sure to be reversed when Americans will realize the error of their ways in 2016.

When they will see their electricity bill "necessarily skyrocket", when they will see that going from "A" to "B" in their cars costs far more than it should, when they will see that there aren't any free phones, when they will see that there is no cash from Obama's stash, when they will see that they will die just as easily under Obamacare, even the stupidest of the 99% who blindly and unreasonably voted for Obama will think a bit more soberly, a bit more logically and a bit more smartly and vote accordingly.

Not even they want to see America "fundamentally transformed".