The Liberal vs. The Conservative

I agree with you, but in today's political environment can you actually name any major Democrat who is liberal but not socialist?
Can you name any Republicans who aren't socialists?

America is a socialist society and has been for some time.

Before bed tonight, and when you wake in the morning, be sure to thank a Wobbly.
Rand Paul. But you're clearly right that most Republicans are socialist as well. Which is why I'm not one. I'm not a Libertarian because I don't believe a true libertarian would be the member of a party, even a Libertarian party. And the party and their endless litmus tests demonstrates that.
Rand Paul advocates the abolition of all market regulation, the repeal of the clean air and water acts, the dissolution of the FDA and all police and fire departments, the end of paved roads and letting your infant starve to death if it can't raise its own capital?

We are all socialists. Some of us just more so than others.
 
A liberal is a champion of the downtrodded. This usually comes from experience with the government and had them help them when they were down and out on their luck, they want to have those programs around so when others are down on their luck, they will have somewhere to go.

A conservative wants to believe that someone is poor because they don't work hard or are losers. They want to ensure no one has any help whatsoever and uses religion as a backdrop to control people's lives.

But anyone who is smart enough to understand that without government programs, chaos would erupt. You would be a democrat. We don't have a lot of smart people in this country.

^^^^^^^And there's proof.^^^^^^^
 
Can you name any Republicans who aren't socialists?

America is a socialist society and has been for some time.

Before bed tonight, and when you wake in the morning, be sure to thank a Wobbly.
Rand Paul. But you're clearly right that most Republicans are socialist as well. Which is why I'm not one. I'm not a Libertarian because I don't believe a true libertarian would be the member of a party, even a Libertarian party. And the party and their endless litmus tests demonstrates that.
Rand Paul advocates the abolition of all market regulation, the repeal of the clean air and water acts, the dissolution of the FDA and all police and fire departments, the end of paved roads and letting your infant starve to death if it can't raise its own capital?
This is full of half truths. For example, actually he supports privatizing police and fire, not eliminating them. You're not a moron, but you're very smug and you need to actually pay more attention to what is actually said and discussed. I do like to banter with liberals and I know it's not productive. I just have fun when they are that extreme. But I know when I'm doing that. I also switch to serious when real points are made, unlike morons who's argument is that Republicans are racists. You don't seem to be aware. I do think you are capable of understanding those subtleties, like your next comment. But you don't seem to be aware or care that you're not really getting what people say.

We are all socialists. Some of us just more so than others.
True, but this is really only an intellectual word game. The term is really used for people who go first to government for solutions. As you say the Republicans sadly do that far to much as well.
 
The term is really used for people who go first to government for solutions

Fail. Socialism originally referred to a stage of socioeconomic development following capitalism and preceding communism. It then came to mean any of a number of systems which might emerge during that period and share its defining traits. It then came to mean advocacy of such systems, especially when they are advocated as the ends rather than as a step towards communism. Today it stands as a blanket term encompassing everything from libertarian socialism to democratic socialism to anarcho-socialism.

People who turn to the State first for everything and elevate to god-like status because it can do no wrong are called statists.
 
he supports privatizing police and fire

Awesome. Then the Crips can hire the police to arrest all the crackas for bein' cracka-ass honkies and not givin' their womens up for the raping
hmm....and you object to MY arguments with liberals? You just like hearing yourself post, don't you?
 
Privatized fire was tried some time ago. Read a history book to see why New York and the rest of the nation gave up that stupidity.

I'm reminded of the scene in Gangs of New York where the two different firemen groups arrive at a fire at the same time, and end up fighting each other while the houses burns.
 
The term is really used for people who go first to government for solutions

Fail. Socialism originally referred to a stage of socioeconomic development following capitalism and preceding communism. It then came to mean any of a number of systems which might emerge during that period and share its defining traits. It then came to mean advocacy of such systems, especially when they are advocated as the ends rather than as a step towards communism. Today it stands as a blanket term encompassing everything from libertarian socialism to democratic socialism to anarcho-socialism.

People who turn to the State first for everything and elevate to god-like status because it can do no wrong are called statists.
Funny how you nit pick sometimes and miss large gaping holes others. I was referring to the people in this country who are running to government for everything. I was not defining the term. Most of the government programs advocated in this country today are socialist. My God, you do like to hear yourself post.
 
Privatized fire was tried some time ago. Read a history book to see why New York and the rest of the nation gave up that stupidity.

I'm reminded of the scene in Gangs of New York where the two different firemen groups arrive at a fire at the same time, and end up fighting each other while the houses burns.
Yeah, that wasn't really an unfair representation.

They had arsonists on their payrolls to keep business up. Pay the wrong people and the competition would burn you down.

Gotta love capitalism.
 
The term is really used for people who go first to government for solutions
Fail. Socialism originally referred to a stage of socioeconomic development following capitalism and preceding communism. It then came to mean any of a number of systems which might emerge during that period and share its defining traits. It then came to mean advocacy of such systems, especially when they are advocated as the ends rather than as a step towards communism. Today it stands as a blanket term encompassing everything from libertarian socialism to democratic socialism to anarcho-socialism.

People who turn to the State first for everything and elevate to god-like status because it can do no wrong are called statists.
Funny how you nit pick sometimes and miss large gaping holes others. I was referring to the people in this country who are running to government for everything. I was not defining the term. Most of the government programs advocated in this country today are socialist. My God, you do like to hear yourself post.
:yawn:

You type a lot of words, but you never say anything meaningful or intelligent.
 
Privatized fire was tried some time ago. Read a history book to see why New York and the rest of the nation gave up that stupidity.

Riiigggghhhht. And government has worked so well. I see why you can't give that up. Government controlled retirement, healthcare, welfare state, military intrusion into other's affairs, the war on drugs and a plethera of other government run programs have been tried non-stop for the last century and haven't given up on that stupidity. Maybe we should explore some other solutions.
 
It only seems that way because the left is made up of those right wing "targets".

The Republican Party is 90% white. They are hostile to minorities. When those minorities fight back, the right says, "Look, see how hostile they are". Well yea. Everyone has a right to defend.

The Republican Party - 90% white, mostly Christian with a smattering of blacks and Hispanics.

The Democratic Party, while a majority is white, barely, included in those whites are people not welcome in the Republican Party, gays, feminists, college professors, scientists and so on. Then include the blacks, Muslims, Hindu, Hispanics, atheists and so on.

There is the difference between the two parties.
Keep talking so people can see where the intolerance is in this country. You sir, have a serious issue. You can't debate points because liberalism is illogical and your policies don't work. They are emotional, emotions like hatred. Like what you preach. Read your posts.

Facts were stated; that you choose to ignore them makes YOU unable to debate. Look up the facts yourself. Clearly you never do, but rely solely on your choice of talking heads to tell you all you need to know.

Oh yeah? Well the Democrat part is 85% white and mostly Christian... What now you fuckin bigot?

Wake the fuck up you twats, most of America is white and believe in God. This is why Rtard has no credibility, why do you go down the same road?
 
Fail. Socialism originally referred to a stage of socioeconomic development following capitalism and preceding communism. It then came to mean any of a number of systems which might emerge during that period and share its defining traits. It then came to mean advocacy of such systems, especially when they are advocated as the ends rather than as a step towards communism. Today it stands as a blanket term encompassing everything from libertarian socialism to democratic socialism to anarcho-socialism.

People who turn to the State first for everything and elevate to god-like status because it can do no wrong are called statists.
Funny how you nit pick sometimes and miss large gaping holes others. I was referring to the people in this country who are running to government for everything. I was not defining the term. Most of the government programs advocated in this country today are socialist. My God, you do like to hear yourself post.
:yawn:

You type a lot of words, but you never say anything meaningful or intelligent.
Bam! Now that's what I'm talking about. Using my own insult back on me. There can be no clearer you can say, "I've got nothing." I love when people do that. Anyway, have a good evening my friend, I gotta run now. I enjoyed the banter.
 
You've described more a socialist example than a Liberal one.

Liberalism takes a laizze-fair approach- the poor starve because they need to so the better can succeed in the free market and make everything better. It's like economic eugenics.
I agree with you, but in today's political environment can you actually name any major Democrat who is liberal but not socialist?
Can you name any Republicans who aren't socialists?

America is a socialist society and has been for some time.

Before bed tonight, and when you wake in the morning, be sure to thank a Wobbly.

I'm just gonna give my answer even though the question was not to me... Ron Paul.
 
What are some of the Primary problems between Liberals and Conservatives today? What are Key differences and beliefs between the 2 groups and how are these issues addressed and taken?

What are negatives and positives of Liberals and Conservatives and how they deal with issues? Which group in your opinion seems to make better sense and more credible decisions when dealing with issues and Why?

There is nothing wrong with having liberal and or conservative opinions, most Americans have elements of both, the problem is when people go to the extremes with both. It doesn't help that people use fallacious reasoning to label someone as either conservative or liberal.
 
Can you name any Republicans who aren't socialists?

America is a socialist society and has been for some time.

Before bed tonight, and when you wake in the morning, be sure to thank a Wobbly.
Rand Paul. But you're clearly right that most Republicans are socialist as well. Which is why I'm not one. I'm not a Libertarian because I don't believe a true libertarian would be the member of a party, even a Libertarian party. And the party and their endless litmus tests demonstrates that.
Rand Paul advocates the abolition of all market regulation, the repeal of the clean air and water acts, the dissolution of the FDA and all police and fire departments, the end of paved roads and letting your infant starve to death if it can't raise its own capital?

We are all socialists. Some of us just more so than others.

I do not think "socialists" means what you think it means.
 
Privatized fire was tried some time ago. Read a history book to see why New York and the rest of the nation gave up that stupidity.

Riiigggghhhht. And government has worked so well. I see why you can't give that up.
I'm satisfied with my fire department. My only real complaint is that they're underfunded, but that's not their faulty- that's city council and the mayor.
Government controlled retirement

You mean SS? It was never meant to be your main source of income when you got old. It was meant to help old workers in their last years.
, healthcare,

The only government-run healthcare get higher scores than private healthcare when rated for customer satisfaction. Personally, I'd love to see some form of Medicare Plus enacted.
welfare state,

Nice buzzword. Not a thing- a catchphrase for the things you're listing.

military intrusion into other's affairs,
Overwhelmingly supported by the right. What dissent there is to be found is mostly on the Left.

the war on drugs
A pet project of authoritarian social conservatives

I know you're new, but you might want to read some of my threads/posts before you make a fool of yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rand Paul. But you're clearly right that most Republicans are socialist as well. Which is why I'm not one. I'm not a Libertarian because I don't believe a true libertarian would be the member of a party, even a Libertarian party. And the party and their endless litmus tests demonstrates that.
Rand Paul advocates the abolition of all market regulation, the repeal of the clean air and water acts, the dissolution of the FDA and all police and fire departments, the end of paved roads and letting your infant starve to death if it can't raise its own capital?

We are all socialists. Some of us just more so than others.

I do not think "socialists" means what you think it means.
Socialism originally referred to a stage of socioeconomic development following capitalism and preceding communism. It then came to mean any of a number of systems which might emerge during that period and share its defining traits. It then came to mean advocacy of such systems, especially when they are advocated as the ends rather than as a step towards communism. Today it stands as a blanket term encompassing everything from libertarian socialism to democratic socialism to anarcho-socialism.


Learn to read.
 

Forum List

Back
Top