The left's rejection of science

So you can take the zygote out of the women and it will live on its own ?

So ... anyone who can't live alone isn't alive? Interesting definition

o-ANGRY-MOM-DOING-LAUNDRY-facebook.jpg


Can we start putting these guys into camps now?
 
So you can take the zygote out of the women and it will live on its own ?

So ... anyone who can't live alone isn't alive? Interesting definition

o-ANGRY-MOM-DOING-LAUNDRY-facebook.jpg


Can we start putting these guys into camps now?

What are you talking about. They can live independently .

A zygote can't live on its own . No matter how much food or warmth you give it .
 
If it's not sustainable then it hasn't begun.
Again dimwit...it is scientific fact that life has begun at conception. Do you have any idea how many lives are sitting in Intensive Care Units across the country as we speak that are hooked to life-support machines because their current condition is unsustainable for life? Does that mean their life "hasn't begun"? Dumb ass.
 
The right rejects science and wants do destroy all institutions of science.
-They reject biology and the research behind it....Evolution is a joke to them.
-They reject the need to invest in science
-They reject the green house theory which is 150 years old
-They reject medical science as they root against vaccines

The right is fucking stupid.
 
If it's not sustainable then it hasn't begun.
Again dimwit...it is scientific fact that life has begun at conception. Do you have any idea how many lives are sitting in Intensive Care Units across the country as we speak that are hooked to life-support machines because their current condition is unsustainable for life? Does that mean their life "hasn't begun"? Dumb ass.

Turning off life support is murder ?
 
Life begins at conception?
I rest my case folks. Another left-wing science denier. It is indisputable scientific fact that life begins at conception. A fetus will have its own unique DNA.

Because a sperm and egg mixed ? You can do that in a test tube !
Yes? And? Has life not been created in a test tube? LMAO! You're not going to attempt to deny that science now too, are you?

Psst....before you look even more stupid:
Scientist Craig Venter creates life for first time in laboratory sparking debate about 'playing god'
 
Turning off life support is murder ?
It can't be! According to you - someone on life support was never alive. After all, you claim the ability to self-sustain is the criteria of life (even though science has already proven otherwise).
 
If it's not sustainable then it hasn't begun.
Again dimwit...it is scientific fact that life has begun at conception. Do you have any idea how many lives are sitting in Intensive Care Units across the country as we speak that are hooked to life-support machines because their current condition is unsustainable for life? Does that mean their life "hasn't begun"? Dumb ass.

Turning off life support is murder ?

You see anything that isn't in the bible 2,000 years ago is bad. You're not going to find logic or sense in discussing shit with these cock sucking republicans.
 
The right rejects science and wants do destroy all institutions of science.
-They reject biology and the research behind it....Evolution is a joke to them.
We embrace biology. It's you left-wing dimwits who reject X and Y chromosomes, snowflake. You're the side that says biology doesn't exist - people can simply think themselves into a new gender. :lmao:
 
Turning off life support is murder ?
It can't be! According to you - someone on life support was never alive. After all, you claim the ability to self-sustain is the criteria of life (even though science has already proven otherwise).

Ummm, I never said that .

Someone in life support was at one time a live viable being .

Unlike the zygote you want to compare them too. Is the person on life support attached to a women whom they feed off ?
 
The right rejects science and wants do destroy all institutions of science.
-They reject the need to invest in science
Show me any conservative that has ever objected to you funding your own science. You can't do it, snowflake. You resort to absurd straw man arguments when you're embarrassed about stories exposing your side for the irrational and uneducated fascists that you are.
 
Yes it cost effin Money to do science...$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

That is a fact....If you don't want to fund science then you're the anti-science one.


Not a federal function except in a very few areas. See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.
 
Unlike the zygote you want to compare them too. Is the person on life support attached to a women whom they feed off ?
So wait...you are more alive if you're attached to artificial machines for survival than if you're attached to a human for survival?!? :lmao:
 
Turning off life support is murder ?
It can't be! According to you - someone on life support was never alive. After all, you claim the ability to self-sustain is the criteria of life (even though science has already proven otherwise).

Ummm, I never said that .
That's exactly what you said - liar. You said self-sustainability is the indication of when life starts. If those people aren't self-sustainable in an ICU, then clearly their life has not started yet. That's your definition chief - own it.

Psst....this is a prime example of why it is a bad idea to deny science.
 
The right rejects science and wants do destroy all institutions of science.
-They reject the green house theory which is 150 years old.
Yeah...and after 150 years....science has completely disproven it. Leave it to a left-wing regressive to insist that climate science was better in 1867 than it is today. :lmao:
 

Forum List

Back
Top