The Left wants to change the rules because they can't win

[Marion Morrison]

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

That's a interesting thought, but, what presidents do that. Kennedy was thought to be a conservative and he was middle of the road nominated by Reagan.
Both picks by Obama are true liberals and not middle of the road but haven been proven to lean to the left.
Why should Trump feel compelled to look for a moderate judge? I don't know of any president that would have done that.

IMO, a Constitutional Conservative is the order of the day.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

For Scotus only 51 votes are needed. Thanks to Harry Reid.

Actually that was for non Supreme Court because of ridiculous GOP obstruction.

The rule has been set in stone.

How do you say?

Oh yeah... "The Law of the land."

 

[francoHFW]

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

That's a interesting thought, but, what presidents do that. Kennedy was thought to be a conservative and he was middle of the road nominated by Reagan.
Both picks by Obama are true liberals and not middle of the road and haven't been proven to lean other than to the left.
Why should Trump feel compelled to look for a moderate judge? I don't know of any president that would have done that.

As a GOP Fox Etc dupe, you know almost nothing in the real world. The best thing Trump could do for Americans is nominate Garland again LOL. But everything he does is 4 his brainwashed Base... I actually like him personally and wish he would check the facts and then do the smart businessman thing.

 

[Marion Morrison]

It's being discussed...

Hey, Democrats: Pack The Court | HuffPost
Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained
Democrats Need to Pack the Supreme Court the Next Chance they Get
Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court
Why Democrats Should Rig the Senate and Pack the Supreme Court
How a new court-packing scheme could save the Supreme Court from right-wing domination
In Defense of Court-Packing
.

From the "Slate" link:

"And they could get more radical than that. If they wanted to, they could pass a law saying you can’t deprive people of their vote for felonies at all. So things like automatic voter registration, restoring voting rights for ex-felons, getting rid of these voter ID laws, which can be swept away with a national law, a national voting holiday— I think that would add millions of votes immediately to the Democratic column for the 2022 midterms."

:sniff sniff:: Is that desperation I smell?

 

[Marion Morrison]

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

That's a interesting thought, but, what presidents do that. Kennedy was thought to be a conservative and he was middle of the road nominated by Reagan.
Both picks by Obama are true liberals and not middle of the road and haven't been proven to lean other than to the left.
Why should Trump feel compelled to look for a moderate judge? I don't know of any president that would have done that.

As a GOP Fox Etc dupe, you know almost nothing in the real world. The best thing Trump could do for Americans is nominate Garland again LOL. But everything he does is 4 his brainwashed Base... I actually like him personally and wish he would check the facts and then do the smart businessman thing.

If he does the "businessman" thing, it's Ted Cruz. IMO, he's the best man for the job.

But that leaves a hole in the Senate, so politics probably come into play.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

If the left obey the Constitution it doesn't matter who Trump nominates to the court. Now watch their heads explode.

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

Explain Kagen and Sotomayor.

Are you saying Obama wasn't a normal President?

I'd put the most hardcore righty in just to watch you squirm. DUPE!

 

[Meister]

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

That's a interesting thought, but, what presidents do that. Kennedy was thought to be a conservative and he was middle of the road nominated by Reagan.
Both picks by Obama are true liberals and not middle of the road and haven't been proven to lean other than to the left.
Why should Trump feel compelled to look for a moderate judge? I don't know of any president that would have done that.

As a GOP Fox Etc dupe, you know almost nothing in the real world. The best thing Trump could do for Americans is nominate Garland again LOL. But everything he does is 4 his brainwashed Base... I actually like him personally and wish he would check the facts and then do the smart businessman thing.

Frankie, It's impossible is have a mature conversation with you. But, before I say "Fuck You", I want to say "you don't have a clue on what your talking about".

 

[Yousaidwhat]

It's being discussed...

Hey, Democrats: Pack The Court | HuffPost
Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained
Democrats Need to Pack the Supreme Court the Next Chance they Get
Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court
Why Democrats Should Rig the Senate and Pack the Supreme Court
How a new court-packing scheme could save the Supreme Court from right-wing domination
In Defense of Court-Packing
.

Are they suggesting that Trump now has the ability to pack the courts?

 

[Marion Morrison]

It's being discussed...

Hey, Democrats: Pack The Court | HuffPost
Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained
Democrats Need to Pack the Supreme Court the Next Chance they Get
Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court
Why Democrats Should Rig the Senate and Pack the Supreme Court
How a new court-packing scheme could save the Supreme Court from right-wing domination
In Defense of Court-Packing
.

Are they suggesting that Trump now has the ability to pack the courts?

They're looking at their election-rigging working this year. I so hope there's extra election oversight and people get caught red-handed.

 

[Thinker101]

Open borders and amnesty for millions of illegals, rigging primaries, no ID required to vote the left have all sorts of election schemes.

No one is for open borders, super duper. The rest is also garbage propaganda never happened. Or continue to be a conspiracy nut job like most GOP voters...

Evidently they don't keep you in the loop...dumbass.
Democrats Want Open Borders, Not Immigration Reform

 

[ptbw forever]

Why, is the left regularly doing things that are unconstitutional?

It isn't unconstitutional but it would never happen now because Dems have no power.

If the left obey the Constitution it doesn't matter who Trump nominates to the court. Now watch their heads explode.

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

That is a satire site.

Democratic Socialist Candidate's Primary Win Revoked After All Her Votes Forcibly Redistributed

This obviously didn't happen.

 

[Thinker101]

It isn't unconstitutional but it would never happen now because Dems have no power.

If the left obey the Constitution it doesn't matter who Trump nominates to the court. Now watch their heads explode.

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

'yo no creo en fronteras'.....translation.....'I do not believe in borders'

Maybe it's you who wrongly understands, Jake

Outside of context. Let it go, woody, let it go.

Tissue?

 

[francoHFW]

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

That's a interesting thought, but, what presidents do that. Kennedy was thought to be a conservative and he was middle of the road nominated by Reagan.
Both picks by Obama are true liberals and not middle of the road but haven been proven to lean to the left.
Why should Trump feel compelled to look for a moderate judge? I don't know of any president that would have done that.

IMO, a Constitutional Conservative is the order of the day.

A moderate one considering who is leaving the court... But what the hell things won't change in until the Democrats get real control again like under LBJ and Obama for 40 days... It would be nice if it wasn't in the middle of another corrupt GOP bubble bust world depression for a change... What is so bad about good infrastructure Healthcare daycare cheap college and training 5 week vacation a SSID card to end illegal immigration and work, like every other modern country? Thanks new BS GOP! They would keep this mess going forever to protect their precious Mega rich greedy idiots and swine brainwashers...

 

[edward37]

MORE is better Coming for you slime
Special Counsel Robert Mueller is asking for more resources for his investigation — including a cadre of additional Justice Department prosecutors, according to a new report from Bloomberg.

According to the report, Mueller has been busy recruiting U.S. attorneys and FBI agents to supplement his investigative team. He already has a team of 17 federal prosecutors working on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Current and former officials who spoke to Bloomberg for the report speculated that the move could indicate Mueller would want to pass off portions of the investigation to other departments at some point.

 

[francoHFW]

It's my understanding that the liberals think that the Constitution is a living breathing document that can be
massaged to mean whatever belief they have at a given time.

You understand wrongly.

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Still reeling from Trump’s previous Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, Democrats plan to scrutinize any new nominee to ensure that he or she isn’t yet another crony of something called “The Constitution,” Senate Democrats announced Friday.

“Time and time again, we find progressive laws getting struck down,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a Senate address. “And it’s always — always — the ones the Constitution is against. These right-wing judges don’t think for themselves, they just do whatever the Constitution says. And it’s time for that to end.”Senate Democrats Demand Supreme Court Nominee Not Be Unduly Influenced By U.S. Constitution

And there ya have it. It truly boggles the mind.

A normal president would nominate a moderate like Kennedy... Or Garland.

Explain Kagen and Sotomayor.

Are you saying Obama wasn't a normal President?

I'd put the most hardcore righty in just to watch you squirm. DUPE!

They replaced well-known liberals on the court... Did not change the balance. As the orange one would say, we'll see what happens. Collins and Makowski or whatever won't vote for overturning Roe versus Wade. Settled law.

 

[francoHFW]

It's being discussed...

Hey, Democrats: Pack The Court | HuffPost
Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained
Democrats Need to Pack the Supreme Court the Next Chance they Get
Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court
Why Democrats Should Rig the Senate and Pack the Supreme Court
How a new court-packing scheme could save the Supreme Court from right-wing domination
In Defense of Court-Packing
.

Are they suggesting that Trump now has the ability to pack the courts?

It is damn hard to stop idiots from talking... LOL

 

[francoHFW]

Open borders and amnesty for millions of illegals, rigging primaries, no ID required to vote the left have all sorts of election schemes.

No one is for open borders, super duper. The rest is also garbage propaganda never happened. Or continue to be a conspiracy nut job like most GOP voters...

Evidently they don't keep you in the loop...dumbass.
Democrats Want Open Borders, Not Immigration Reform

Wrong again, super dupers. To start with, Democrats only had control of the Senate with 60 votes for about 40 days, all spent on ACA. The 2010 comprehensive immigration bill was blocked like everything else. It started with a goodSSID card that would end this mess forever, like every other modern country. But of course the GOP dupes believe that is communism LOL arrrggghhh... Breaking: the wall is stupid. And already there...

 

[Thinker101]

Open borders and amnesty for millions of illegals, rigging primaries, no ID required to vote the left have all sorts of election schemes.

No one is for open borders, super duper. The rest is also garbage propaganda never happened. Or continue to be a conspiracy nut job like most GOP voters...

Evidently they don't keep you in the loop...dumbass.
Democrats Want Open Borders, Not Immigration Reform

Wrong again, super dupers. To start with, Democrats only had control of the Senate with 60 votes for about 40 days, all spent on ACA. The 2010 comprehensive immigration bill was blocked like everything else. It started with a goodSSID card that would end this mess forever, like every other modern country. But of course the GOP dupes believe that is communism LOL arrrggghhh... Breaking: the wall is stupid. And already there...

W...T....F? I sure didn't say anything about the Senate, or 60 votes or communism....dumbass.

 

[busybee01]

Open borders and amnesty for millions of illegals, rigging primaries, no ID required to vote the left have all sorts of election schemes.

Pray tell how were the primaries rigged. This is something akin to a urban myth among Trump supporters. Sort of like the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot.

 

[francoHFW]

Open borders and amnesty for millions of illegals, rigging primaries, no ID required to vote the left have all sorts of election schemes.

No one is for open borders, super duper. The rest is also garbage propaganda never happened. Or continue to be a conspiracy nut job like most GOP voters...

Evidently they don't keep you in the loop...dumbass.
Democrats Want Open Borders, Not Immigration Reform

Wrong again, super dupers. To start with, Democrats only had control of the Senate with 60 votes for about 40 days, all spent on ACA. The 2010 comprehensive immigration bill was blocked like everything else. It started with a goodSSID card that would end this mess forever, like every other modern country. But of course the GOP dupes believe that is communism LOL arrrggghhh... Breaking: the wall is stupid. And already there...

W...T....F? I sure didn't say anything about the Senate, or 60 votes or communism....dumbass.

Read your dumbass brainwashed propaganda link, dumbass.