The left has been exposed, It was always about Bush and not war.

eagle7_31

Gold Member
Mar 6, 2013
3,357
627
245
for the most part.

Yes. We saw that in the 2003 marches. We saw placards about same-sex marriage, "the living wage," anti-Israel slogans, Che pictures, etc. Most of the placards had nothing to do with war! Did you see any placards at the demonstrations saying that Hillary Clinton and John Kerry voted for the war? or that President Clinton had bombed Iraq 4 times over MWDs?
 
Their president attempts to launch an illegal strike...got to defend it.

Their president expands the Patriot Act and spies on email and phone call data...no sweat, liberal either cheer, or they are silent.

And Guantanamo? When's the last time you heard about that?
 
the left does have its way of speaking out of both sides of their mouths.

There is an old saying in DC, its not what is done or said that matters usually, its who says it and who does it.
 
And liberals were 100% vindicated by the outcome of Bush's stupid Iraq War.

Turns out those liberal protesters were right, and the warmongers were wrong.
 
422859_10150580720056902_597676901_9351604_214564002_n.jpg
 
"Bandar has formed close relationships with several American presidents, notably George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, the latter giving him the affectionate and controversial nickname 'Bandar Bush'[10]..."

"He advocated Saddam Hussein's overthrow in Iraq in March 2003.[12]..."

Bandar Bush's name has resurfaced at Ghouta in the last week:

"The U.S., Britain, and France as well as the Arab League have accused the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for carrying out the chemical weapons attack, which mainly targeted civilians. U.S. warships are stationed in the Mediterranean Sea to launch military strikes against Syria in punishment for carrying out a massive chemical weapons attack.

"The U.S. and others are not interested in examining any contrary evidence, with U.S Secretary of State John Kerry saying Monday that Assad’s guilt was “a judgment … already clear to the world.”

"However, from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack."

EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

Yeah...I know.
mintpressnews??????
How does its credibility compare to Obama, Bandar, Bush, and the corporate war whores?
 
Last edited:
for the most part.

Yes. We saw that in the 2003 marches. We saw placards about same-sex marriage, "the living wage," anti-Israel slogans, Che pictures, etc. Most of the placards had nothing to do with war! Did you see any placards at the demonstrations saying that Hillary Clinton and John Kerry voted for the war? or that President Clinton had bombed Iraq 4 times over MWDs?

Hillary Clinton lost her chance to be president because of her support for the Iraq war.
 
Apparently if America wants any influence in Syria after Assad is deposed we have to be seen as a country who helped contribute to his demise. I think that would be an unpopular motive to give for intervention so we're going to use that "poison gas" issue instead. Certain other groups will benefit in other ways by Assad's departure too.
 
And liberals were 100% vindicated by the outcome of Bush's stupid Iraq War.

Turns out those liberal protesters were right, and the warmongers were wrong.

What is as equally vindicating, is this little rant about Bush. Nothing condemning Obama for his want to insert his nose where it doesn't belong. If Obama goes to war, you liberals are just as much warmongers as you claim conservatives of being.

Think before you post.
 
And liberals were 100% vindicated by the outcome of Bush's stupid Iraq War.

Turns out those liberal protesters were right, and the warmongers were wrong.

What is as equally vindicating, is this little rant about Bush. Nothing condemning Obama for his want to insert his nose where it doesn't belong. If Obama goes to war, you liberals are just as much warmongers as you claim conservatives of being.

Think before you post.

If we oppose going to war in Syria, how does that translate into us being warmongers?
 
Obama is against the use of chemical weapons and Assad must be punished. Has nothing to do with Bush's lies and the stupidest war in US history, 4000 killed for nothing.
 
Obama is against the use of chemical weapons and Assad must be punished. Has nothing to do with Bush's lies and the stupidest war in US history, 4000 killed for nothing.

Horseshit---Syria has everything to do with oil and pipelines. Bush tried the WMD thing too remember ?
 
Democrats and the Left have no principle other than "give us power". Everything they say is predicated on that.
Obama's moves here are dictated solely by how he thinks they will be received by his base, his party, America, Europe, and the world. Whether it is the right course or whether it will achieve his stated goal is irrelevant. That is why he has waffled for so long on it.
 
And liberals were 100% vindicated by the outcome of Bush's stupid Iraq War.

Turns out those liberal protesters were right, and the warmongers were wrong.

What is as equally vindicating, is this little rant about Bush. Nothing condemning Obama for his want to insert his nose where it doesn't belong. If Obama goes to war, you liberals are just as much warmongers as you claim conservatives of being.

Think before you post.

If we oppose going to war in Syria, how does that translate into us being warmongers?

Because once he actually goes in, you liberals will find every excuse in the book to justify him being there. Oh, did I mention you voted for him?
 
What is as equally vindicating, is this little rant about Bush. Nothing condemning Obama for his want to insert his nose where it doesn't belong. If Obama goes to war, you liberals are just as much warmongers as you claim conservatives of being.

Think before you post.

If we oppose going to war in Syria, how does that translate into us being warmongers?

Because once he actually goes in, you liberals will find every excuse in the book to justify him being there. Oh, did I mention you voted for him?

Once you have to start pretending what the other guy believes, you've lost the argument.

You lose again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top