The Jewish "race"?

[montelatici]

You didn't. I was merely explaining my point as your intellectual and comprehension skills are so clearly limited; as well as your spelling. Your comment should read, "Sorry. Didn't mean to hurt your little feelings. Jerk."

R U telling me how to thpell?
Many of us here would think that the jerk is you. What type of subject is this to bring up on a forum except to incite others against the Jews? Naturally, you being an anti-Semite just eat up threads such as this. Let's also face it, Penelope is also an anti-Semite like you and she can't get enough of this thread.

Not under CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW it doesn't. But it does m

Well it does, it makes you a Zionist colonist.

Not under CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW it doesn't. But it does make all the Palestinians illegal immigrants under the same law.

The Palestinians are the indigenous inhabitants, how can they be illegal immigrants under any law, much less the laws you make up as you go?

Are you back at it again, Mr. S., with the same old, same old stuff. The vast majority of the Arabs came from their poor surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Are you that blind that you don't see your fellow Arabs and other poor people swarming into Europe, America and Canada for jobs?

Palestinians The Invented People

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

 

[Challenger]

Phoney's imagination knows no bounds.

So let's get this straight, Phoney was adopted so the chances are he has no idea who his parents were, yet he can trace his lineage back to the Roman invasion? That's really good going, I'm impressed. Most English famillies who care about such things can only manage tracing their ancestors back to the Norman conquest.

 

[montelatici]

Well, it's always that way with pathological liars. They always trip themselves up thinking people will forget what they lied about before their next lie. He will, however, come back and claim that though he was adopted, he knows who his real parents were. Another lie, of course.

 

[Agit8r]

Maybe there are politically correct terms that would tell you what you want to know.

Not sure that I want to try my luck with that....

 

[Challenger]

Not according to leading geneticists who have shown that the Ashkenazi Jews have a closer match to the Sephardic Jews that either has to arab muslims. In fact arab muslims have a closer match to dogs, apes and bananas than they have to the Jews. The DNA has been analysed and it shows this to be a fact, this is why the arab muslims will not have DNA testing done as it can show they are not from Palestine but from Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq and Saudi.

It's a hoot, Phoenall, how the Arabs and their fellow Jew haters on this forum can't get enough of trying to prove that the European Jews aren't genetically similar to the Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews. The bottom line is that they are trying so hard to convince people that all the land in the Middle East belongs to the Arabs and not one inch belongs to the Jews. I would suggest that the Arabs on this forum plus their fellow travelers have their DNA tests to see if they have some Jewish blood themselves (horrors) or if they are really close relatives to chimpaneze and gorillas. Don't pay attention to what they call you because I think the readers who aren't Jew haters can see right through them and what their intentions really are. Why do you think a thread like this was even started?

Tracing the Roots of Jewishness Science AAAS News

New genetic study More evidence for modern Ashkenazi Jews ancient Hebrew patrimony Scope Blog

Patrimony? Isn't it Jewish law that if your mother wasn't Jewish, neither are you?

 

[Challenger]

NOPE as it is the work of many people and has been edited for publication, making it a non source document. That is what its official designation is a pamphlet and it was sold on the open market for gain.
Now if it had one author and had been published as a dissertation then it would be a "source" document

Another fail by Abdul on this non source document.

Utter and total bilge. Of course it's a source document, by your logic the Torah was written by many people and has been edited for publication, so it too is a "non source document" (whatever one of those is)

FYI documentary sources come in three categories Primary, Secondary and Tertiary:
A primary source is a document written about an event at the time in question by a person involved.
A secondary source is a document written after the event or by someone not involved in the event.
A teriary source is a history book or Wikipedia.

http://net.lib.byu.edu/~paz4/Eng_Sources.pdf

 

[RoccoR]

Challenger, Phoenall, et al

As far as it goes (source typing), our friend "Challenger" has made a valid point. But I would not confuse "source typing" with a "source evaluation."

NOPE as it is the work of many people and has been edited for publication, making it a non source document. That is what its official designation is a pamphlet and it was sold on the open market for gain.
Now if it had one author and had been published as a dissertation then it would be a "source" document

Another fail by Abdul on this non source document.

Utter and total bilge. Of course it's a source document, by your logic the Torah was written by many people and has been edited for publication, so it too is a "non source document" (whatever one of those is)

FYI documentary sources come in three categories Primary, Secondary and Tertiary:
A primary source is a document written about an event at the time in question by a person involved.
A secondary source is a document written after the event or by someone not involved in the event.
A teriary source is a history book or Wikipedia.

http://net.lib.byu.edu/~paz4/Eng_Sources.pdf

(COMMENT)

But there is much more to the evaluation of source material than this; it is actually a special skill set (as in the Harvard Guide to Using Sources). Source typing has more to do with the "point of origin" of the material or the recoding of the data. Whereas the "evaluation of a source" has more to do with the purpose, objectivity, accuracy, reliability, credibility and timeliness of the information. Similarly, the presentation of information and datum has a lot to do with how certain information is perceived.

Whether a source is categorized as a Primary, Secondary or Tertiary is not as important as whether or not the manner of the presentation is sound and valid ---- or ---- accuracy, reliability, and credibility.

In the case of "Faith Based" interpretive documents (the Torah, the Bible, the Koran, etc), are much different than the documentation and data subjected to the more rigid "Scientific Method" wherein all evidence must be empirical (based on evidence); which is again different from material subjected to the rigor of a systematic development based on reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language (the Philosophical Approach).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Challenger]

Challenger, Phoenall, et al

As far as it goes (source typing), our friend "Challenger" has made a valid point. But I would not confuse "source typing" with a "source evaluation."

NOPE as it is the work of many people and has been edited for publication, making it a non source document. That is what its official designation is a pamphlet and it was sold on the open market for gain.
Now if it had one author and had been published as a dissertation then it would be a "source" document

Another fail by Abdul on this non source document.

Utter and total bilge. Of course it's a source document, by your logic the Torah was written by many people and has been edited for publication, so it too is a "non source document" (whatever one of those is)

FYI documentary sources come in three categories Primary, Secondary and Tertiary:
A primary source is a document written about an event at the time in question by a person involved.
A secondary source is a document written after the event or by someone not involved in the event.
A teriary source is a history book or Wikipedia.

http://net.lib.byu.edu/~paz4/Eng_Sources.pdf

(COMMENT)

But there is much more to the evaluation of source material than this; it is actually a special skill set (as in the Harvard Guide to Using Sources). Source typing has more to do with the "point of origin" of the material or the recoding of the data. Whereas the "evaluation of a source" has more to do with the purpose, objectivity, accuracy, reliability, credibility and timeliness of the information. Similarly, the presentation of information and datum has a lot to do with how certain information is perceived.

Whether a source is categorized as a Primary, Secondary or Tertiary is not as important as whether or not the manner of the presentation is sound and valid ---- or ---- accuracy, reliability, and credibility.

In the case of "Faith Based" interpretive documents (the Torah, the Bible, the Koran, etc), are much different than the documentation and data subjected to the more rigid "Scientific Method" wherein all evidence must be empirical (based on evidence); which is again different from material subjected to the rigor of a systematic development based on reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language (the Philosophical Approach).

Most Respectfully,
R

I didn't want to delve into source evaluation, too much, too soon might have caused Phoney's head to explode.

 

[Hossfly]

R U telling me how to thpell?
Many of us here would think that the jerk is you. What type of subject is this to bring up on a forum except to incite others against the Jews? Naturally, you being an anti-Semite just eat up threads such as this. Let's also face it, Penelope is also an anti-Semite like you and she can't get enough of this thread.

Not under CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW it doesn't. But it does m
Not under CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW it doesn't. But it does make all the Palestinians illegal immigrants under the same law.

The Palestinians are the indigenous inhabitants, how can they be illegal immigrants under any law, much less the laws you make up as you go?

Are you back at it again, Mr. S., with the same old, same old stuff. The vast majority of the Arabs came from their poor surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Are you that blind that you don't see your fellow Arabs and other poor people swarming into Europe, America and Canada for jobs?

Palestinians The Invented People

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

 

[Challenger]

The Palestinians are the indigenous inhabitants, how can they be illegal immigrants under any law, much less the laws you make up as you go?

Are you back at it again, Mr. S., with the same old, same old stuff. The vast majority of the Arabs came from their poor surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Are you that blind that you don't see your fellow Arabs and other poor people swarming into Europe, America and Canada for jobs?

Palestinians The Invented People

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

 

[Phoenall]

Are you back at it again, Mr. S., with the same old, same old stuff. The vast majority of the Arabs came from their poor surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Are you that blind that you don't see your fellow Arabs and other poor people swarming into Europe, America and Canada for jobs?

Palestinians The Invented People

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Not really as by its very title it shows it is not a "source" document, but an edited and published pamphlet sold as such. A source document would have one author and not be edited by a publishing house.

Another fail on the same document you have failed on so many times in the past. Keep trying one day you may get it right..............

It is the source document. All of your whining and crying can't change that. But, even for you, calling a thousand plus page treatise a pamphlet, is just silly. It is the definitive source document on Palestine. Of course, the fact that a Jewish foundation and two U.S. University sponsor the archive makes it unimpeachable. You should read it. Learn some facts instead of posting bullshit.

"A Survey of Palestine Volume 2
Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry, 1946

The material thus assembled is a survey of Palestine and was prepared between the middle of December, 1945, and the end of January, 1946. The object of the survey was to examine the conditions in Palestine with special attention to subjects bearing on absorptive capacity."

A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

It is the definitive source of information used by the UN for the Partition Plan. You really are making a fool of yourself. In any case, every other source document has the same information, the Survey of Palastine is just more detailed. But go ahead and continue making things up.




It is included as Appendix 9 of the UN Partition Plan.

"
(a) Memorandum on the Administration of Palestine under the Mandate. Jerusalem, June 1947, 14 pages.

(b) Survey of Palestine, Volumes I and II, prepared in December. 1945 and January 1946 for the information of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry (Volumes I and II, 1139 pages, with a table of contents at the beginning of each volume and an index at the end of Volume II).
See Annex 5.

(c) A Survey of Palestine, Volume III, containing analyses and additional information compiled in March 1946 at the request of members of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry. This volume (pages 1141 to 1371) supplements the first two volumes; its table of con-tents refers to the relevant chapters in Volumes I and II.

(d) Supplement to Survey of Palestine. Notes compiled for the information of the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, June 1947, 153 pages. Its table of contents refers to the relevant pages in the first two volumes of the Survey of Palestine.

It can be engraved in marble it still wont make it a source document as it was written by a committee and edited by a publishing house. This means that the original intent of the author has been modified to meet the POV of the committee and the editor. You even post the fact that it is not a source document yourself, and still you make the false claims. Now try looking for real source documents like the Ottoman census and the British census that combined shows that the arab muslim illegally migrated into Palestine

 

[Phoenall]

Are you back at it again, Mr. S., with the same old, same old stuff. The vast majority of the Arabs came from their poor surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Are you that blind that you don't see your fellow Arabs and other poor people swarming into Europe, America and Canada for jobs?

Palestinians The Invented People

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

Not according to arab muslim sources that stated the arab muslims migrated tom Palestine on the promise of work

Palestinian Myths

Gaza had no more than 80,000 "native" inhabitants in 1951, at the end of Israel's Independence War against the whole Arab world. Gaza was occupied by Arabs: How is it possible that in only 50 years it has increased from 80,000 to more than one million people? Are all those Arabs of Gaza so skilful as to procreate children in a supernatural way? Mass immigration is the ONLY plausible explanation for such a demographic increase


The Arab occupation between 1948 and 1967 was an advantageous opportunity for Arab leaders to promote mass immigration of so-called "Palestinians" (a mishmash of Arab immigrants) into Judea, Samaria and Gaza from every Arab country, mainly Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan. In fact, since 1950 until the Six-Day War, under Jordanian rule, more than 250 Arab settlements have been founded in Judea and Samaria. The recent construction of the Arab houses is quite evident by the materials used for building: concrete and cinderblock.

 

[Challenger]

Anyone can post links to propaganda pieces, but the facts are the facts and are available from university and UN archives. From the Anglo-American Survey of Palestine Vol. II archived by the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU and Wagner Univ. which states of 414,456 migrants to Palestine, 376,415 were Jews. Blows your BS out of the water I'm afraid.

Home Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

View attachment 36413

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

Not according to arab muslim sources that stated the arab muslims migrated tom Palestine on the promise of work

Palestinian Myths

Gaza had no more than 80,000 "native" inhabitants in 1951, at the end of Israel's Independence War against the whole Arab world. Gaza was occupied by Arabs: How is it possible that in only 50 years it has increased from 80,000 to more than one million people? Are all those Arabs of Gaza so skilful as to procreate children in a supernatural way? Mass immigration is the ONLY plausible explanation for such a demographic increase


The Arab occupation between 1948 and 1967 was an advantageous opportunity for Arab leaders to promote mass immigration of so-called "Palestinians" (a mishmash of Arab immigrants) into Judea, Samaria and Gaza from every Arab country, mainly Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan. In fact, since 1950 until the Six-Day War, under Jordanian rule, more than 250 Arab settlements have been founded in Judea and Samaria. The recent construction of the Arab houses is quite evident by the materials used for building: concrete and cinderblock.

You' are kidding, right. Hasbara blog site.

 

[montelatici]

Phoney is hilarious, he rejects source documentation from academic or UN archives and then links to a Hasbara propaganda site. Entertaining to watch his childish antics.

 

[Challenger]

Phoney is hilarious, he rejects source documentation from academic or UN archives and then links to a Hasbara propaganda site. Entertaining to watch his childish antics.

Still has no idea what a source document is, even after being helped out by RoccoR. As they say, "you can take a horse to water...."

 

[Phoenall]

Mr. S.'s chart doesn't show what the number of Arabs there were in that particular region before they came from their poor countries for the jobs the Jews had for them. We can see that Mr. S. is on a roll today with his b.s. version of facts while he wants us to think that the others are posting b.s. This was still a stupid thread to start with, and it was only started to incite hatred against the Jews. Why don't Mr. S. and Penelope start a thread illustrating the different races of Muslims if they are so interested in race.

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

Not according to arab muslim sources that stated the arab muslims migrated tom Palestine on the promise of work

Palestinian Myths

Gaza had no more than 80,000 "native" inhabitants in 1951, at the end of Israel's Independence War against the whole Arab world. Gaza was occupied by Arabs: How is it possible that in only 50 years it has increased from 80,000 to more than one million people? Are all those Arabs of Gaza so skilful as to procreate children in a supernatural way? Mass immigration is the ONLY plausible explanation for such a demographic increase


The Arab occupation between 1948 and 1967 was an advantageous opportunity for Arab leaders to promote mass immigration of so-called "Palestinians" (a mishmash of Arab immigrants) into Judea, Samaria and Gaza from every Arab country, mainly Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan. In fact, since 1950 until the Six-Day War, under Jordanian rule, more than 250 Arab settlements have been founded in Judea and Samaria. The recent construction of the Arab houses is quite evident by the materials used for building: concrete and cinderblock.

You' are kidding, right. Hasbara blog site.

Now were does it say it is a blog ?

Then how about a LINK showing that it is a HASBARA site ?

 

[Phoenall]

Phoney is hilarious, he rejects source documentation from academic or UN archives and then links to a Hasbara propaganda site. Entertaining to watch his childish antics.

So any article that is lodged with any academic institution or the UN archives is a source document. Does this include all the Jewish academic institutions and the Jewish documents in the UN archives ?

Because when they have been used you have dismissed them out of hand because of their source.

Even more entertaining watching you go round and round in circles and disappearing up your own ass.

 

[Phoenall]

Phoney is hilarious, he rejects source documentation from academic or UN archives and then links to a Hasbara propaganda site. Entertaining to watch his childish antics.

Still has no idea what a source document is, even after being helped out by RoccoR. As they say, "you can take a horse to water...."

I know exactly what a source document is, it is you and the other illiterate ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES that don't. Try looking at abduls description of a source document and I will produce thousands that you will claim to be HASBARA

 

[montelatici]

A

Of course, source documents are not acceptable to you bozos. All you believe is what Hasbara puts out or what is printed on partisan blogs by Zionists. But let's set the definitive source document on Palestine, the Survey of Palestine aside, let's use the Mandatory's (Britain's) first report to settle your silly refusal to face facts. Why do you believe bullshit when the actual source documents are available from academic archives and the UN archives?

Excerpt from the Mandatory's report to the League of Nations written in July 1921

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

Not according to arab muslim sources that stated the arab muslims migrated tom Palestine on the promise of work

Palestinian Myths

Gaza had no more than 80,000 "native" inhabitants in 1951, at the end of Israel's Independence War against the whole Arab world. Gaza was occupied by Arabs: How is it possible that in only 50 years it has increased from 80,000 to more than one million people? Are all those Arabs of Gaza so skilful as to procreate children in a supernatural way? Mass immigration is the ONLY plausible explanation for such a demographic increase


The Arab occupation between 1948 and 1967 was an advantageous opportunity for Arab leaders to promote mass immigration of so-called "Palestinians" (a mishmash of Arab immigrants) into Judea, Samaria and Gaza from every Arab country, mainly Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan. In fact, since 1950 until the Six-Day War, under Jordanian rule, more than 250 Arab settlements have been founded in Judea and Samaria. The recent construction of the Arab houses is quite evident by the materials used for building: concrete and cinderblock.

You' are kidding, right. Hasbara blog site.

Now were does it say it is a blog ?

Then how about a LINK showing that it is a HASBARA site ?

It is a blog "under construction" and the author is Avraham Sandor. Nice neutral name.

 

[Phoenall]

A

What Mr. S. is leaving out is that after 1850 when the Jews arrived from Europe, they started to really develop the country and thus had jobs for the Arabs from the poor surrounding countries, just like we see poor people pouring into the U.S., Canada and Europe these days. Don't you see a lot of new immigrants in your own area, Mr. S.? If you live in a decent sized city and don't see them, your eyes must be closed. Hmm, wonder how many Arabs are living in just one place now, like Dearborn, Michigan. Why did they leave their "prosperous" Arab lands.

Another Zionist myth promulgated by people like Joan Peters. Jewish immigrants created "jobs" for Jewish immigrants only.

Not according to arab muslim sources that stated the arab muslims migrated tom Palestine on the promise of work

Palestinian Myths

Gaza had no more than 80,000 "native" inhabitants in 1951, at the end of Israel's Independence War against the whole Arab world. Gaza was occupied by Arabs: How is it possible that in only 50 years it has increased from 80,000 to more than one million people? Are all those Arabs of Gaza so skilful as to procreate children in a supernatural way? Mass immigration is the ONLY plausible explanation for such a demographic increase


The Arab occupation between 1948 and 1967 was an advantageous opportunity for Arab leaders to promote mass immigration of so-called "Palestinians" (a mishmash of Arab immigrants) into Judea, Samaria and Gaza from every Arab country, mainly Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Jordan. In fact, since 1950 until the Six-Day War, under Jordanian rule, more than 250 Arab settlements have been founded in Judea and Samaria. The recent construction of the Arab houses is quite evident by the materials used for building: concrete and cinderblock.

You' are kidding, right. Hasbara blog site.

Now were does it say it is a blog ?

Then how about a LINK showing that it is a HASBARA site ?

It is a blog "under construction" and the author is Avraham Sandor. Nice neutral name.

Wrong again Abdul it is a site as shown by a whois search

Whois imninalu.net