Oh for goodness sakes, what a crock of tooey!
The article states the Democratic Rep said the refugees should be welcomed. He doesn't State when or where this Democratic Rep said such...but ok.
Then the article proceeds to state that the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE got wind of Refugees being sent to Maryland, and the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE threw an absolute tizzy fit about the refugees coming there and the REPUBLICAN representative, got HHS to change their minds due to some ''water'' issue....
So the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE's actions and his followers are NOW considered the Democratic Representative, and liberal followers?
CUT ME A BREAK!
Do you guys even read your own articles? What in the world am I missing here?
The article states the Democratic Rep said the refugees should be welcomed. He doesn't State when or where this Democratic Rep said such...but ok.
Then the article proceeds to state that the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE got wind of Refugees being sent to Maryland, and the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE threw an absolute tizzy fit about the refugees coming there and the REPUBLICAN representative, got HHS to change their minds due to some ''water'' issue....
So the REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE's actions and his followers are NOW considered the Democratic Representative, and liberal followers?
CUT ME A BREAK!
Do you guys even read your own articles? What in the world am I missing here?
Last edited: