The global warming priests are faking data again....their god demands it....

[2aguy]

A new study shows that when the global warming priesthood adjusts temperature data to get rid of bias, they always bias the adjustments to make the data warmer......

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

 

[Stratford57]

Megyn Kelly: European leaders were quick to react, accusing President Trump of shirking America’s role as a global leader. President Putin, how do you see it?

Vladimir Putin: Actually, we should be grateful to President Trump. I heard it was actually snowing in Moscow today, while here it is raining and quite chilly. Now we can blame everything on him and US imperialism, and say it is all their fault. But we will not.
St Petersburg International Economic Forum plenary meeting (Kremlin site)

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

A new study shows that when the global warming priesthood adjusts temperature data to get rid of bias, they always bias the adjustments to make the data warmer......

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Just yesterday the 5th of July 2017, the temperature was 78 degrees, about 30 degrees lower than normal. If the Earth(Earf for inner city folks) is warming up year after year, how can the temperature be lower this year than the last?

 

[2aguy]

A new study shows that when the global warming priesthood adjusts temperature data to get rid of bias, they always bias the adjustments to make the data warmer......

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Just yesterday the 5th of July 2017, the temperature was 78 degrees, about 30 degrees lower than normal. If the Earth(Earf for inner city folks) is warming up year after year, how can the temperature be lower this year than the last?

The man made global warming priesthood will shake the bones, toss them and read them to answer your question....

 

[FJO]

A new study shows that when the global warming priesthood adjusts temperature data to get rid of bias, they always bias the adjustments to make the data warmer......

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Just yesterday the 5th of July 2017, the temperature was 78 degrees, about 30 degrees lower than normal. If the Earth(Earf for inner city folks) is warming up year after year, how can the temperature be lower this year than the last?

It is weather not climate, they will tell you.

 

[blastoff]

Weren't we all supposed to be dead by now according to the hucksters who started pushing the global warming bullshit forty-some years ago?

As Ricky Ricardo would say, Wha hoppen?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I just can't be bothered to care about this stupid shit.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

A new study shows that when the global warming priesthood adjusts temperature data to get rid of bias, they always bias the adjustments to make the data warmer......

EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.

Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.

In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

Just yesterday the 5th of July 2017, the temperature was 78 degrees, about 30 degrees lower than normal. If the Earth(Earf for inner city folks) is warming up year after year, how can the temperature be lower this year than the last?

Cuz y'all leff da fridge door open.

 

[Old Rocks]

Well now, the OP seems to believe that this paper is accurate. It is not, and is in the process of being torn apart by other scientists.

However, one does not have to go to scientists to see that these assholes are lying. First, the Arctic Sea Ice recession demonstrates that the pole area is warming up, and fast. For 400 years a way through the Northwest Passage was sought. When finally done, from 1903 to 1906, it was in a reinforced herring boat, 80 tons, and took three years. Last year, a 1000 passenger luxury cruise easily did the passage. Our alpine glaciers are disappearing all over the world. That is attested to by people that have nothing to do with climate science, but live by those glaciers. In a short time, Glacier National Park will have no glaciers.

Now what the lying assholes are stating is that the scientists at NASA, NOAA, and other scientific agencies are lying, and in on a conspiracy to delude all of us. Not only that, but the scientific agencies of Japan, the EU, China, and all the other nations are in on that conspiracy as well. Got enough tin hats to go around fellows?

All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. That the lot of you are too fucking dumb to see that a few of any discipline will sell their soul for gold is clearly apparent. The chief naysayers of AGW in the US, Singer and Lindzen went before Congress and stated that smoking tobacco is harmless. The fellows that wrote this report have exactly the same ethics.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well now, the OP seems to believe that this paper is accurate. It is not, and is in the process of being torn apart by other scientists.

However, one does not have to go to scientists to see that these assholes are lying. First, the Arctic Sea Ice recession demonstrates that the pole area is warming up, and fast. For 400 years a way through the Northwest Passage was sought. When finally done, from 1903 to 1906, it was in a reinforced herring boat, 80 tons, and took three years. Last year, a 1000 passenger luxury cruise easily did the passage. Our alpine glaciers are disappearing all over the world. That is attested to by people that have nothing to do with climate science, but live by those glaciers. In a short time, Glacier National Park will have no glaciers.

Now what the lying assholes are stating is that the scientists at NASA, NOAA, and other scientific agencies are lying, and in on a conspiracy to delude all of us. Not only that, but the scientific agencies of Japan, the EU, China, and all the other nations are in on that conspiracy as well. Got enough tin hats to go around fellows?

All the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. That the lot of you are too fucking dumb to see that a few of any discipline will sell their soul for gold is clearly apparent. The chief naysayers of AGW in the US, Singer and Lindzen went before Congress and stated that smoking tobacco is harmless. The fellows that wrote this report have exactly the same ethics.

Which scientist are at this time ripping it up



Link?


No what the OP is saying is NASA, NOAA, the met are manipulating temperature readings


Edit you make it seem lindzen was testifying on saying tobbaco was harmless he was invited to testify on the statistics alone ...
And we all know second hand smoke was a huge lie.





.

.