The future of N. Korea

[Sundance508]

 

[frigidweirdo]

Oh, the irony. People who want control of atomic bombs who want to drop atomic bombs on other people because they might threaten other people with atomic bombs.

 

[Sundance508]

Oh, the irony. People who want control of atomic bombs who want to drop atomic bombs on other people because they might threaten other people with atomic bombs.

Oh the stupidity of one moron who cannot understand it is the obligation of our Commander-in-Chief to protect the American People. He cannot say American...he cannot say N. Korea...thus he coinfuses himself and comes out as a incoherent ass. hehheh

 

[frigidweirdo]

Oh, the irony. People who want control of atomic bombs who want to drop atomic bombs on other people because they might threaten other people with atomic bombs.

Oh the stupidity of one moron who cannot understand it is the obligation of our Commander-in-Chief to protect the American People. He cannot say American...he cannot say N. Korea...thus he coinfuses himself and comes out as a incoherent ass. hehheh

Insults as an argument huh? Maybe if you can write this post without insults I'll reply.

 

[whitehall]

We are dealing with a couple competing forums in this post .First of all today's North Korea's political situation is a result of the combined incompetence of mid 20th century politics and criminal negligence. The American losses in the three year quagmire range, depending on your political/historical education, of between 35,000 and 50,000 and were either justified or later ignored by the MSM when Korea was classified as the "Forgotten War".

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

A picture does not qualify as original commentary when starting a new thread