The First Strike to Protect Capitalism

[Wry Catcher]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

 

[Defiant1]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

Damn, you liberals are stupid. 12%
You must need assistance to breathe.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

LOL

From a guy who never worked in the real world.

Yeah, that's fair that someone who got an MBA or Law Degree and works 60 to 80 hours a week should only make 12% more than a Chooming stoner high school drop out.

LOL.

What a tool. See why Progressive economies fail 100% of the time?

If I wanted to start a thread highlighting what a fucking moron you are I would have fallen far short of your OP.

Thanks for that, Freddo

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

His money, his choice.

Shrug.

 

[Wry Catcher]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

Damn, you liberals are stupid. 12%
You must need assistance to breathe.

Why? Tell us, what makes fairness stupid, and what is the risk when income inequality grows and grows?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let the thread die, Freddo. Not sure why you'd want to highlight what a fucking moron you are

 

[Iceweasel]

He's cutting his salary to 70k. It remains to be seen how long it will take for him to realize the stress of running the business is worth more than sweeping the floors.

 

[Jomama]

Yeah, that's fair that someone who got an MBA or Law Degree and works 60 to 80 hours a week should only make 12% more than a Chooming stoner high school drop out.

LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He's cutting his salary to 70k. It remains to be seen how long it will take for him to realize the stress of running the business is worth more than sweeping the floors.

Only in Progressive-land does that make any sense. Now you see why Progressive have a 100% Fail rate at running an economy

 

[Wry Catcher]

He's cutting his salary to 70k. It remains to be seen how long it will take for him to realize the stress of running the business is worth more than sweeping the floors.

Only in Progressive-land does that make any sense. Now you see why Progressive have a 100% Fail rate at running an economy

Food for thought:

Theodore Roosevelt - policy domestic foreign second

'
The rise of "The Regulatory State" that gained much of its legitimacy during Roosevelt's presidency was as much an essential part of the modern political economy as was the emergence of the corporate form of business organization and the multinational business firm. Although in the final quarter of the century that began with the Age of Theodore Roosevelt a variety of economic interests came to use "deregulation" as an effective political slogan, in fact none of even those same interests truly envisioned a major withdrawal by the federal government of its regulatory role. Most of what went on in the politics of the 1880s and 1890s aimed chiefly at rearranging the structure of competitive costs and advantages that different business and other interests had constructed in previous decades. No one understood the vital importance of the modern regulatory state better than Theodore Roosevelt, and through all the political smoke of the 1890s it remained clear that his perceptions continued to serve modern government."

Read more: Theodore Roosevelt - policy domestic foreign second

Oops, I forgot, food for thought has never been on CF's diet plan.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

why not pay everybody the same and dress everybody the same?? Then we too could slowly starve 120 million to death. Why did Stalin and Mao get to have all the liberal fun?

See why we have to be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??

 

[Wry Catcher]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

why not pay everybody the same and dress everybody the same?? Then we too could slowly starve 120 million to death. Why did Stalin and Mao get to have all the liberal fun?

See why we have to be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??

A first strike, thus, making people think. It's really that simple.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

why not pay everybody the same and dress everybody the same?? Then we too could slowly starve 120 million to death. Why did Stalin and Mao get to have all the liberal fun?

See why we have to be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??

A first strike, thus, making people think. It's really that simple.

Why not pay everybody the same and dress everybody the same?? Then we could slowly starve 120 million to death too. Why did Stalin and Mao get to have all the liberal fun?

See why we have to be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I fail to see why people would be critical of this move.

On one hand, you can say that well paid employees are motivated employees. The hope here is that the environment will foster an environment that will drive the company to better heights.

On the other hand, you've saddled yourself against your competition. Anyone who takes you on could easily beat you on costs.

But most of this is coming from his salary. He dropped 930,000 into the pot which can be drawn to push others up.

If his competitors are paying 1,000,000 to the top dog, they are 930 K in the hole to start.

The math is simple.

The real struggle becomes when the government seeks to force other companies to do this.

Other companies might like this idea. However, they have to compete and this guy might not be competitive (or he might be).

If his company grows ten times....then his contribution is very diluted and keeping that many employees at 70K is going to be tough.

But, he is welcomed to try.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

`The First Strike to save Capitalism from the greed of Capitalists. And some dare call this move Socialism.

CEO defends 70 000 minimum for employees Money - Home

I find it noble, but a bit to extreme = a three their system of salary, with no more than a 12% spread between the mail room and the board room seems fair.

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

the liberal solution is always men with guns!!! Why do you ask???

In short, liberalism is violence!!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

the liberal solution is always men with guns!!! Why do you ask???

In short, liberalism is violence!!

I differentiate between liberals and the far left.

The whole gun thing is far left....not liberal.

 

[westwall]

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

the liberal solution is always men with guns!!! Why do you ask???

In short, liberalism is violence!!

No, PROGRESSIVISM is violence. Liberals are pretty easy going.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

the liberal solution is always men with guns!!! Why do you ask???

In short, liberalism is violence!!

No, PROGRESSIVISM is violence. Liberals are pretty easy going.

When and where has there been a violent progressive riot?

 

[westwall]

Is your idea that someone is going to enforce your concept of fairness ?

the liberal solution is always men with guns!!! Why do you ask???

In short, liberalism is violence!!

No, PROGRESSIVISM is violence. Liberals are pretty easy going.

When and where has there been a violent progressive riot?

Progressive governments such as Soviet Russia, Fascist Germany and Fascist Italy are replete with examples of progressive violence.