The Facts About D. Trump's Infidelity

[Fenton Lum]

Trump has gone Nuts attacking a key GOP group ....


Now Trump Is Just Openly Attacking The Religious Right
Businessman and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is now openly attacking leaders of the Religious Right who are critical of him, using Twitter to blast the head of the Southern Baptist Convention’s political arm as “a nasty guy with no heart.”

On Monday morning, Trump published a tweet labeling Russell Moore, head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, as “a terrible representative of Evangelicals.” Moore is an established leader of the Religious Right and has traditionally voiced support for Republican candidates, but has been unusually critical of Trump, who he sees as unrepresentative of evangelical Christian values.

“Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.”
― Barry M. Goldwater

“I am frankly sick and tired of the political preachers telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in A, B, C, and D. Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? ”
― Barry M. Goldwater

But you know, this was back when "conservatives" were, well, conservative.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Don't expect her to ever ever ever reply on topic. She's a troll. Period.

On the face of it, I agree with the OP that politicians sexuality is their business and the business of their spouses.

What I believe is worth noting is one of them calls the kettle black, as we see almost every day with RWNJ thumpers, telling how others should live while they are doing much worse.

And now we're seeing seeing with Drumpf. But, he lies and flip flops every day and he's proud of being a serial philanderer, a rapist and all around slime bucket.

If he (and the RWNJs ^^) don't want his sexual lying and cheating discussed, he should shut his mouth and stop pretending his lies are facts.

You calling ANYONE a "troll" is fucking laughable being that you define the term. Not only are you a stupid piece of shit, but you whine about the actions of others that you are by FAR the most guilty of. Anyone that write that post that knows you had to be laughing their ass off at the irony.

Oh hi Dale. Have you gotten you personal and social lives back on track? Who did I call a troll? That's awful, please point me to the post.

Hey, dumb fuck....look again and you will see that my post was in response to Luddy...not you. BTW, have you recovered from the ass kicking you got yesterday when it came to the climate change issue? Rodney King took less of a beating than you did. (snicker)

Another self absorbed self declaration ov victory. Sic 'em dale.

Ehhh....I certainly kicked your ass and I hope it made you a better man.

Sure dale, whatever your little existence needs to cling to.

 

[conserveguy877]

.

I for one don't think D. Trump's many extra-marital affairs and philandering should be held against him, most marriage counselors and studies show that he's acting the same as the majority of Americans (men and women) and-----and statistically wealthy men are more likely to be womanizers than... anyone else.
Bottom line for me: D. Trump's womanizing may statistically be the most normal thing D. Trump does on a regular basis.


Facts and Statistics About Infidelity

Given the secretive nature of infidelity, exact figures about cheating and extra-marital affairs are nearly impossible to establish. But listed below are some of the most well-supported facts about cheating. All cited sources can be found on our reference page.

• It is estimated that roughly 30% to 60% of all married individuals (in the United States) will engage in infidelity at some point during their marriage (see Buss & Shackelford for review of this research). And these numbers are probably on the conservative side, if you consider that close to half of all marriages end in divorce (people are more likely to stray as relationships fall apart; also see, who is likely to cheat).
• Research consistently shows that 2% to 3% of all children are the product of infidelity (see Anderson). And most of these children are unknowingly raised by men who are not their biological fathers. DNA testing is finally making it easy for people to check the paternity of their children (see paternity issues).
• Infidelity is becoming more common among people under 30. Many experts believe this increase in cheating is due to greater opportunity (time spent away from a spouse), as well as young people developing the habit of having multiple sexual partners before marriage (see young and restless – Wall Street Journal).
• There are no definitive signs of cheating. But, in hindsight you will always find them (see signs of infidelity).

• Some cultures have adopted extreme measures to combat infidelity: female circumcision, allowing only limited contact between the sexes, and even death as a punishment. Other cultures view infidelity in a more nuanced way, and may not see it as a serious marital problem.

• Men are more likely to cheat than women. But as women become more financially independent, they are beginning to act more like men with respect to infidelity (see cheating wife, cheating husband, why men cheat, and why women cheat).

• In many cases, infidelity is never discovered (see cheating spouse quiz).

• Emotionally, it is possible to have feelings for more than one person at a time. Pragmatically, loving more than one person is difficult to do (see polyamory – Truth, Lies, and Romance Blog).

• As more and more women enter the work force, office romances are becoming more common. Spouses often spend more time with coworkers than with each other.

• The internet, e-mail, and chat rooms are making it easier for people to engage in infidelity (see online cheating).

• The initial decision to be unfaithful is rarely if ever a rational choice; instead, infidelity is usually driven by circumstances and one’s emotions. In fact, most people are surprised by their own behavior at the start of an affair (see decision to cheat).

• Emotional infidelity, compared to pure physical infidelity, can inflict as much if not more hurt, pain and suffering. And to make matters worse, most infidelity involves both physical and emotional betrayal (see what counts as cheating).

• Unfortunately, many people find a more suitable mate (someone they love more than their spouse) after they are already married.

• Biological evidence (i.e., research on biology and reproduction) indicates that long-term monogamy is difficult for humans to achieve—NOT impossible, but difficult (see Barash & Lipton or the myth of monogamy – Salon.com).

• Almost everyone admits to having fantasies that involve someone other than a spouse (see our indecent thoughts survey).

<snip>

For recent research on the topic of infidelity, visit our blog.

.

Yes, we all know Trump used to be a player back in the 80's... That was then, but this is NOW!

 

[Dale Smith]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

 

[tinydancer]

Trump has gone Nuts attacking a key GOP group ....


Now Trump Is Just Openly Attacking The Religious Right
Businessman and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is now openly attacking leaders of the Religious Right who are critical of him, using Twitter to blast the head of the Southern Baptist Convention’s political arm as “a nasty guy with no heart.”

On Monday morning, Trump published a tweet labeling Russell Moore, head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, as “a terrible representative of Evangelicals.” Moore is an established leader of the Religious Right and has traditionally voiced support for Republican candidates, but has been unusually critical of Trump, who he sees as unrepresentative of evangelical Christian values.

And we told him to fuck off. Don't you get what is going down?

 

[tinydancer]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

Mea culpa on the Bush family.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

lets see has lost the Hispanic vote, the Black vote, the women vote, and now is burning bridges with the evangelical s ....its fine by me ...the more the merrier I feel

 

[Dale Smith]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

Mea culpa on the Bush family.

Try not to be too hard on yourself...at least you woke up.

 

[Toro]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

hahahaha

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Wang Schlong Trump Chump
Sam Wang Electoral Vote Estimate: Clinton 364 - Trump 174
Sam Wang ‏@SamWangPhD 17 minutes ago
Current state-level poll snapshot: Clinton 358 EV, Trump 164 EV, 16 close. Forcing all races, 364-174. 2016 Presidential Election Interactive Map #2016election


linton adds AZ, UT, NC

 

[Fenton Lum]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

Cool man, a reset is fine with me too. For me, it ain't left, right, that's all bullshit and distraction. It's the system. The entire thing is a lie, all of it.

That would be because america floats on a predatory societal wealth extraction paradigm. Now, who orchestrated this and how was it done? Poor folk with no voice? Black folk? "Liberals"? Affluent folk who've done well playing by the rules? Or lobbyists with corporate power and funding money that both parties really represent instead of the unsubstantial working class people and impoverished?

Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street Bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses

That’s how it really is here.

It's the system and it bears down on all of us. They need us, the masses, quibbling amongst ourselves over anything to keep the angst, anxiety and emotional level high so we react emotionally instead of coherently. There indeed HAS been a vast wealth redistribution scam afoot over the past 4-5 decades or so, just not in the direction the 6 multinational corporate media machine (which presides over 90% of what americans see and hear) are always blathering on about. Fox News and MSNBC are selling the same perceptual reality; just tickling different neural reward centers in their respective constituencies. It’s really all the same schtick. You got fucked. We’re all getting fucked, but we can’t put the picture together and pull together. By design.

You don't need to back anything I put out there unless you feel overlap. I've never doubted you've dug into detail, but we all need to be aware that the power structure wants all of us at each other's throats so the mining of our society can continue unabated.

Take care, gotta run, and I apologize.

 

[Dale Smith]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

Cool man, a reset is fine with me too. For me, it ain't left, right, that's all bullshit and distraction. It's the system. The entire thing is a lie, all of it.

That would be because america floats on a predatory societal wealth extraction paradigm. Now, who orchestrated this and how was it done? Poor folk with no voice? Black folk? "Liberals"? Affluent folk who've done well playing by the rules? Or lobbyists with corporate power and funding money that both parties really represent instead of the unsubstantial working class people and impoverished?

Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street Bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses

That’s how it really is here.

It's the system and it bears down on all of us. They need us, the masses, quibbling amongst ourselves over anything to keep the angst, anxiety and emotional level high so we react emotionally instead of coherently. There indeed HAS been a vast wealth redistribution scam afoot over the past 4-5 decades or so, just not in the direction the 6 multinational corporate media machine (which presides over 90% of what americans see and hear) are always blathering on about. Fox News and MSNBC are selling the same perceptual reality; just tickling different neural reward centers in their respective constituencies. It’s really all the same schtick. You got fucked. We’re all getting fucked, but we can’t put the picture together and pull together. By design.

You don't need to back anything I put out there unless you feel overlap. I've never doubted you've dug into detail, but we all need to be aware that the power structure wants all of us at each other's throats so the mining of our society can continue unabated.

Take care, gotta run, and I apologize.[/QUOTE

I apologize for being a dick to you but if that is what it took to get you to write what may be the best post ever written on this or any other board? I would do it all over again. You fucking NAILED it. I wish that I had 1,000 "Winner" badges to lay on ya....

 

[Fenton Lum]

BTW, let it be known that SassyIrishLass rocks the house...the fact that leftards don't like her only elevates my opinion of her

Rock on with your bad self, S.I.L..........

I see a lot of commonality in you two, give ya that. "leftards" screed is all you're about and here for.

Fenton, I am not trying to be a jerk...ok? I just know a lot of stuff. I have dedicated my life the last 4 years doing nothing BUT this because I got sucked in by the Bush crime family and the neocons. It embarrassed me so bad that I hung my ass out there like I did that finding the truth became my obsession and I don't care how ugly it is. If you are right on something that coincides with my thousands upon thousands of hours that I have researched, I am going to back you 100 percent regardless of whether you are left or right.

Cool man, a reset is fine with me too. For me, it ain't left, right, that's all bullshit and distraction. It's the system. The entire thing is a lie, all of it.

That would be because america floats on a predatory societal wealth extraction paradigm. Now, who orchestrated this and how was it done? Poor folk with no voice? Black folk? "Liberals"? Affluent folk who've done well playing by the rules? Or lobbyists with corporate power and funding money that both parties really represent instead of the unsubstantial working class people and impoverished?

Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street Bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses

That’s how it really is here.

It's the system and it bears down on all of us. They need us, the masses, quibbling amongst ourselves over anything to keep the angst, anxiety and emotional level high so we react emotionally instead of coherently. There indeed HAS been a vast wealth redistribution scam afoot over the past 4-5 decades or so, just not in the direction the 6 multinational corporate media machine (which presides over 90% of what americans see and hear) are always blathering on about. Fox News and MSNBC are selling the same perceptual reality; just tickling different neural reward centers in their respective constituencies. It’s really all the same schtick. You got fucked. We’re all getting fucked, but we can’t put the picture together and pull together. By design.

You don't need to back anything I put out there unless you feel overlap. I've never doubted you've dug into detail, but we all need to be aware that the power structure wants all of us at each other's throats so the mining of our society can continue unabated.

Take care, gotta run, and I apologize.[/QUOTE

I apologize for being a dick to you but if that is what it took to get you to write what may be the best post ever written on this or any other board? I would do it all over again. You fucking NAILED it. I wish that I had 1,000 "Winner" badges to lay on ya....

If we could all just let go of how the system has programmed our perception of reality my friend. Cheers.

 

[Timmy]

OH WELL, you stood by a man who was impeached for using his position of POWER on a young woman the same age as his daughter was for sexual gratification, was Impeached for LYING about it and still plans on voting for the enabler wife of the man. sit down no one cares about your accusations

Impeached by the house ! Lol! That and four quarters gets u a dollar.

Look, we all know the dems are godless heathens ! The true hypocrisy is the right wing lecturing about Jesus and family values . Then they ignore all their shit when THEIR guy is a sinning jackass .

 

[kaz]

.

I for one don't think D. Trump's many extra-marital affairs and philandering should be held against him, most marriage counselors and studies show that he's acting the same as the majority of Americans (men and women) and-----and statistically wealthy men are more likely to be womanizers than... anyone else.
Bottom line for me: D. Trump's womanizing may statistically be the most normal thing D. Trump does on a regular basis.


Facts and Statistics About Infidelity

Given the secretive nature of infidelity, exact figures about cheating and extra-marital affairs are nearly impossible to establish. But listed below are some of the most well-supported facts about cheating. All cited sources can be found on our reference page.

• It is estimated that roughly 30% to 60% of all married individuals (in the United States) will engage in infidelity at some point during their marriage (see Buss & Shackelford for review of this research). And these numbers are probably on the conservative side, if you consider that close to half of all marriages end in divorce (people are more likely to stray as relationships fall apart; also see, who is likely to cheat).
• Research consistently shows that 2% to 3% of all children are the product of infidelity (see Anderson). And most of these children are unknowingly raised by men who are not their biological fathers. DNA testing is finally making it easy for people to check the paternity of their children (see paternity issues).
• Infidelity is becoming more common among people under 30. Many experts believe this increase in cheating is due to greater opportunity (time spent away from a spouse), as well as young people developing the habit of having multiple sexual partners before marriage (see young and restless – Wall Street Journal).
• There are no definitive signs of cheating. But, in hindsight you will always find them (see signs of infidelity).

• Some cultures have adopted extreme measures to combat infidelity: female circumcision, allowing only limited contact between the sexes, and even death as a punishment. Other cultures view infidelity in a more nuanced way, and may not see it as a serious marital problem.

• Men are more likely to cheat than women. But as women become more financially independent, they are beginning to act more like men with respect to infidelity (see cheating wife, cheating husband, why men cheat, and why women cheat).

• In many cases, infidelity is never discovered (see cheating spouse quiz).

• Emotionally, it is possible to have feelings for more than one person at a time. Pragmatically, loving more than one person is difficult to do (see polyamory – Truth, Lies, and Romance Blog).

• As more and more women enter the work force, office romances are becoming more common. Spouses often spend more time with coworkers than with each other.

• The internet, e-mail, and chat rooms are making it easier for people to engage in infidelity (see online cheating).

• The initial decision to be unfaithful is rarely if ever a rational choice; instead, infidelity is usually driven by circumstances and one’s emotions. In fact, most people are surprised by their own behavior at the start of an affair (see decision to cheat).

• Emotional infidelity, compared to pure physical infidelity, can inflict as much if not more hurt, pain and suffering. And to make matters worse, most infidelity involves both physical and emotional betrayal (see what counts as cheating).

• Unfortunately, many people find a more suitable mate (someone they love more than their spouse) after they are already married.

• Biological evidence (i.e., research on biology and reproduction) indicates that long-term monogamy is difficult for humans to achieve—NOT impossible, but difficult (see Barash & Lipton or the myth of monogamy – Salon.com).

• Almost everyone admits to having fantasies that involve someone other than a spouse (see our indecent thoughts survey).

<snip>

For recent research on the topic of infidelity, visit our blog.

.

You don't think it should be held against him, so you started a thread holding it against him ..



wow, you must really hate slick ...

 

[Star]

Trump has gone Nuts attacking a key GOP group ....


Now Trump Is Just Openly Attacking The Religious Right
Businessman and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is now openly attacking leaders of the Religious Right who are critical of him, using Twitter to blast the head of the Southern Baptist Convention’s political arm as “a nasty guy with no heart.”

On Monday morning, Trump published a tweet labeling Russell Moore, head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, as “a terrible representative of Evangelicals.” Moore is an established leader of the Religious Right and has traditionally voiced support for Republican candidates, but has been unusually critical of Trump, who he sees as unrepresentative of evangelical Christian values.

I wonder where the evangies will go when the rightwing/MSM starts reporting that their second favorite person (Ken Starr) in history is defending D. Trumps "terrific guy", a guy that might be peddling/pimping sex for financial gain? I wonder if the evangies will start thinking a member of the United Methodist Church and former Goldwater Girl might...?


Donald Trump: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,'' Trump told New York magazine in a 2002 profile of Epstein written three years before Epstein began to be investigated. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life."


So far as I can tell Hillary's never been to D. Trump's "terrific guy's" island but-----D. Trump's been to his pal's island many times...

Moralist Ken Starr Explains His Help For Billionaire Pervert Jeffrey Epstein​

Andrew Kreig
February 8, 2015

Famed educator and legal scholar Ken Starr led a forum last week at the National Press Club to inspire faith-based instruction — and then was asked to describe why he had helped billionaire Jeffrey Epstein avoid serious prison time in 2008 on allegations Epstein had molested dozens of underage girls.

The president and chancellor of Baylor University, responding to a question after the close of a forum he led Feb. 4 on “The Calling of Faith-based Universities,” told me he was “very happy” to help serve a client of his former law firm, Chicago-based Kirkland & Ellis. Starr, a former federal judge and U.S. solicitor general,

<snip>

Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book: A Sampler
Daily Mail, Houseman who cleaned pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's sex toys and feared he would make him 'disappear' takes billionaire's secrets to the grave after he died just last week, Martin Gould, Jan. 5, 2015. Alfredo Rodriguez, Epstein's houseman for many years, passed away last week, his widow Patricia Dunn told DailyMail.com. Court papers reveal that Rodriguez claimed he witnessed nude girls whom he believed were underage at the pool area of the home. He also claimed that Epstein viewed pornographic images of underage girls on his home computers. Rodriguez kept a 'black book' of Epstein's -- which he referred to as 'The Holy Graiil.' He tried to obtain $50,000 from lawyers for Epstein's book. Ex-butler called it an 'insurance policy' because he was afraid Epstein would 'make him disappear.' The houseman went to jail in 2011 for failing to turn over the book. Alfredo Rodriguez, who was Epstein's houseman for many years, passed away last week after a six-month battle with cancer, his widow Patricia Dunn told DailyMail.com. He carried many secrets of Epstein's scandalous activities to his grave.

Black Book Names
Editor's Note: Here are some of the better known names listed in a list of Jeffrey Epstein contacts maintained by his late, longtime Florida housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez and now entered into the federal court docket in Miami. We put top royalty and financial royalty in the first section and list others in alphabetical order. Rodriguez reputedly circled those names he believed involved in improper sexual activities in Florida. Of those on the top part of the list, only Prince Andrew was circled. David Rockefeller -- the last surviving grandchild of the nation's richest person (inflation-adjusted), John D. Rockefeller -- is scheduled to celebrate his 100th birthday this year.

Queen Elizabeth

Prince Andrew, Duke of York

Saudi Arabia's Prince Salman (recently named king)

Edward de Rothschild

Evelyn de Rothschild

David Rockefeller

*****

Ehud Barak

David Blaine

Tony Blair

Michael Bloomberg

Edgar Bronfman

Jean Luc Brunel

Jimmy Buffet

Richard Branson

Bill Clinton

Philip Dunne

Ralph Fiennes

Princess Firyal, wife Prince Muhammad bin Talal of Jordan

Rocco Forte

Alan Dershowitz

Bernie Ecclestone and Flavio Briatore (Formula One)

Sarah Ferguson

Steve Forbes (Forbes magazine)

Katie Ford (former Ford modeling agency CEO).

David Frost

Mariella Frostrup

Lloyd Grossman

Liz Hurley

Michael Jackson

Mick Jagger

Edward Kennedy

Ethel Kennedy

John Kerry

Henry Kissinger

Edward Koch

Courtney Love

Lord Peter Mandelson

Eric Margolis

John Micklethwait (Economist editor in chief)

George Mitchell

Rupert Murdoch

David Putnam

Bill Richardson

Gerald Ronson

Charlie Rose

Jessica Rothschild

Hannah Rothschild

Jeffrey Sachs

Edmund Saffra

James Sainsbury

Rupert Soames

Peter Soros

Harry Sutherland

Hugo Swire

Alfred Taubman

Donald Trump

Ivana Trump

Barbara Walters

Les Wexner

Elie Wiesel

Shaun Woodward

Toby Young

<snip>

More rightwing love for dirt on the rich and famous here.

.