The Expert is here, the White House can become professional and normal...

[BULLDOG]

So you're complaining because the same security is given to Obama's daughters as is given to Trump's grown children. Got it.

Actually you are complaining about a parent just wanting their kid to finish the school year at the school he started it at, and wanting to stay behind for a few months to keep an eye on him.

Wow, parenting.

I'm complaining about more than 30 million dollars. Did you forget that part?

And how much as a percentage of federal spending does that constitute over the period in question?

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

 

[OldLady]

It's about more than 30 million dollars, you dumb twat.

it Obama's kids wanted to stay at a given school location,and Michelle stayed with them, I doubt I would have heard a peep from you.

But this is just low hanging fruit you hacktwats use to pump your egos and feel "special" and your fart-sniffing parties.

(shout out to the site, btw, for some reason hacktwat is now a word with regards to the spell check)

But they didn't. Only selfish arrogant tyrants would do something like the Trumps did in this situation.

That's not the issue. A simple question, If Obama and Michelle wanted to keep either of their kids in School back in Chicago and she stayed there, would you have an issue with it?

YES!!!

BULLSHIT!!

Ask a question. Demand an answer. Then say BULLSHIT to the answer.
You're fun to talk with, ya know?

 

[BULLDOG]

it Obama's kids wanted to stay at a given school location,and Michelle stayed with them, I doubt I would have heard a peep from you.

But this is just low hanging fruit you hacktwats use to pump your egos and feel "special" and your fart-sniffing parties.

(shout out to the site, btw, for some reason hacktwat is now a word with regards to the spell check)

But they didn't. Only selfish arrogant tyrants would do something like the Trumps did in this situation.

That's not the issue. A simple question, If Obama and Michelle wanted to keep either of their kids in School back in Chicago and she stayed there, would you have an issue with it?

YES!!!

BULLSHIT!!

Ask a question. Demand an answer. Then say BULLSHIT to the answer.
You're fun to talk with, ya know?

It's what RWNJs do

 

[frigidweirdo]

Look, I don't care if you want to use this joke for your partisan bullshit nonsense or not. It was a joke. You clearly don't want to get the joke. I still don't care. You want to make it political. I don't care. I'm not going to get hot and bothered about you trying to make this into what it isn't.

So.....?

How many jokes did you make about Obama's kids?

None, and I've not made a joke about Trump's kids either, not even the daughter.

You just did. you are mocking his T-shirt.

Dude, I don't usually like insulting people, but.... if you keep pushing some non-existent crap because you don't understand a joke, I might just have to make an exception for you.

It's pathetic really. You're so partisan all you can see is winning some mythical partisan politics bullshit points.

You used the son's T shirt as a prop to mock the father. Stop trying to back-track.

Hey, I'll tell you what. I'll leave you to your ridiculous nonsense, and you can keep yourself happy and content pretending you give a fuck about this.

Bye.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So... you're talking partisan nonsense then?

I'm clearly not mocking Barron, but the father. The boy could almost certainly do a better job.

I'm clearly not mocking Barron, but the father.

Barron is the one wearing the "I'm an Expert" shirt.

Do I really have to explain this simple joke for you? Seriously? I thought any old dunce would get this joke, clearly I was wrong.

If it were a simple joke, I would have laughed.

the only thing 'simple' was the joker

Wait, so, I've got another mod insulting me.

Again, I don't give a shit if you don't get the joke. But to come on here and insult me.....

There was no joke.

Barron was wearing the shirt, not Donald.

Fucking hell..... hey, I'm bored of you people trying to squeeze something out of nothing.....

 

[Auld Phart]

Barron is the one wearing the "I'm an Expert" shirt.

Do I really have to explain this simple joke for you? Seriously? I thought any old dunce would get this joke, clearly I was wrong.

If it were a simple joke, I would have laughed.

the only thing 'simple' was the joker

Wait, so, I've got another mod insulting me.

Again, I don't give a shit if you don't get the joke. But to come on here and insult me.....

There was no joke.

Barron was wearing the shirt, not Donald.

Fucking hell..... hey, I'm bored of you people trying to squeeze something out of nothing.....

hey, I'm bored of you people trying to squeeze something out of nothing.....

an appropriate comment, considering the subject.

 

[martybegan]

Actually you are complaining about a parent just wanting their kid to finish the school year at the school he started it at, and wanting to stay behind for a few months to keep an eye on him.

Wow, parenting.

I'm complaining about more than 30 million dollars. Did you forget that part?

And how much as a percentage of federal spending does that constitute over the period in question?

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

 

[martybegan]

How many jokes did you make about Obama's kids?

None, and I've not made a joke about Trump's kids either, not even the daughter.

You just did. you are mocking his T-shirt.

Dude, I don't usually like insulting people, but.... if you keep pushing some non-existent crap because you don't understand a joke, I might just have to make an exception for you.

It's pathetic really. You're so partisan all you can see is winning some mythical partisan politics bullshit points.

You used the son's T shirt as a prop to mock the father. Stop trying to back-track.

Hey, I'll tell you what. I'll leave you to your ridiculous nonsense, and you can keep yourself happy and content pretending you give a fuck about this.

Bye.

Aww, teh poor baybee got called out on something and is now running like the scawed wibble boy he is.

 

[martybegan]

it Obama's kids wanted to stay at a given school location,and Michelle stayed with them, I doubt I would have heard a peep from you.

But this is just low hanging fruit you hacktwats use to pump your egos and feel "special" and your fart-sniffing parties.

(shout out to the site, btw, for some reason hacktwat is now a word with regards to the spell check)

But they didn't. Only selfish arrogant tyrants would do something like the Trumps did in this situation.

That's not the issue. A simple question, If Obama and Michelle wanted to keep either of their kids in School back in Chicago and she stayed there, would you have an issue with it?

YES!!!

BULLSHIT!!

Ask a question. Demand an answer. Then say BULLSHIT to the answer.
You're fun to talk with, ya know?

Because we know the answer is bullshit, his partisan track record is evidence enough.

 

[Care4all]

Yes folks, time for the White House to become presidential for once, the expert is taking over.

/---- Liberals true strength is mocking special needs kids like Baron and Trig plus murdering defenseless babies in their abortion mills. It's their Super Power.

Barron is 'Special needs'?

/---- He may be autistic making him fair game for the Liberal attack machine.

Media nonsense. He's normal. Just too damn tall for his age.

Agree!!!
When all said and done on the growing end, Baron could end up as tall as Comey!!!!

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm complaining about more than 30 million dollars. Did you forget that part?

And how much as a percentage of federal spending does that constitute over the period in question?

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

 

[martybegan]

And how much as a percentage of federal spending does that constitute over the period in question?

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

 

[BULLDOG]

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

 

[martybegan]

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

Really? I wonder why all those congressmen always whine about having to cut one thing to fund another. You know, like cutting healthcare to make sure the rich get their tax breaks.

 

[martybegan]

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

Really? I wonder why all those congressmen always whine about having to cut one thing to fund another. You know, like cutting healthcare to make sure the rich get their tax breaks.

Another function that the federal government should have very little to do with.

I would LOVE to see what happens if California goes single payer.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

Really? I wonder why all those congressmen always whine about having to cut one thing to fund another. You know, like cutting healthcare to make sure the rich get their tax breaks.

Another function that the federal government should have very little to do with.

I would LOVE to see what happens if California goes single payer.

Difference being that reality is what we have to deal with. Your RWNJ wishful thinking doesn't really count.

 

[martybegan]

Always with the giving $$ away to subsidize non-sustainable behavior.

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

Really? I wonder why all those congressmen always whine about having to cut one thing to fund another. You know, like cutting healthcare to make sure the rich get their tax breaks.

Another function that the federal government should have very little to do with.

I would LOVE to see what happens if California goes single payer.

Difference being that reality is what we have to deal with. Your RWNJ wishful thinking doesn't really count.

Oh, and THROW OTHER PEOPLE"S MONEY AT IT seems to work so well..

The only time Welfare rolls go down is when so called "RWNJ"'s decide to make people be a bit more responsible before they get their handout.

But you give them someone else's money, they don't improve, but don't starve, and you pat yourselves on the back for "solving" something or other.

 

[BULLDOG]

But I thought you said it was such a small amount till it didn't matter.

Fed spending is one thing, local spending is another. Let the States handle it.

And protecting the president and his family has always been something the SS has had to do since it's inception. With all the vitriol you idiots are spreading, it's amazing it isn't more expensive.

Funding one doesn't remove funding for another, another fallacy on your part.

Really? I wonder why all those congressmen always whine about having to cut one thing to fund another. You know, like cutting healthcare to make sure the rich get their tax breaks.

Another function that the federal government should have very little to do with.

I would LOVE to see what happens if California goes single payer.

Difference being that reality is what we have to deal with. Your RWNJ wishful thinking doesn't really count.

Oh, and THROW OTHER PEOPLE"S MONEY AT IT seems to work so well..

The only time Welfare rolls go down is when so called "RWNJ"'s decide to make people be a bit more responsible before they get their handout.

But you give them someone else's money, they don't improve, but don't starve, and you pat yourselves on the back for "solving" something or other.

When I compared the amount spent to let that spoiled kid finish the year in his same school to the price of helping a single mother feed her child, it was still within the same line of discussion, especially since you said it was only a small amount of money. You'e trying to go to a completely different subject now. Why?

 

[Cellblock2429]

And how much as a percentage of federal spending does that constitute over the period in question?

It constitutes over 30 million.

When the feds spend 10 BILLION a day, your concern is comical.

Yep 30 million is just hilarious.

it's not the money, it's who its being spent on for you. Just admit it.

Yes, only thirty million. such a small amount, yet we can't afford to give a single mother 129 per month to help feed her child. That would be more than 19,379 years of helping single mothers at 129 per month.

/---- Who said we can't afford it? Can you afford to pay 10 people's annual membership to the NRA? If so, should you be forced to? How much did the Obozo's spend to send their spoiled kids to private school?