The Envirowhackos are Melting!

[Manonthestreet]

Jerry Brown: Climate change challenges are as serious as those faced in World War II
This is an affront to WWII vets and the people on the home front who toiled endless hrs doing without even simple luxuries, especially since US is meeting pseudo goals set for us and doing so without a carbon tax and other onerous govt stupid ideas.

 

[Crick]

It is not.

 

[Manonthestreet]

It is not.

yes ….yes it is ………..

 

[Crick]

Find us a WW-II vet or homefront volunteer who feels "affronted" by his claim.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Find us a WW-II vet or homefront volunteer who feels "affronted" by his claim.

ALmost all dead which is why he probably felt safe in saying it

 

[Weatherman2020]

Find us a WW-II vet or homefront volunteer who feels "affronted" by his claim.

Dumber than a brick you is.

 

[Crick]

Nowhere near the desperation required to have driven you to make that inane of a comment

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Climate Change politics is a Fear Tool used to herd the weak minded liberal sheep.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Climate Change politics is a Fear Tool used to herd the weak minded liberal sheep.

Press is actually inducing Psychosis in the poor children and their children parents.
'Climate grief': The growing emotional toll of climate change
The increasing visibility of climate change, combined with bleak scientific reports and rising carbon dioxide emissions, is taking a toll on mental health, especially among young people, who are increasingly losing hope for their future. Experts call it “climate grief,” depression, anxiety and mourning over climate change.

Last year, the American Psychological Association issued a report on climate change’s effect on mental health. The report primarily dealt with trauma from extreme weather but also recognized that “gradual, long-term changes in climate can also surface a number of different emotions, including fear, anger, feelings of powerlessness, or exhaustion.”

 

[Crepitus]

Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?

1. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

2. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere.

3. The hypothesized warming due to mankind's burning of hydrocarbon fuels, which is the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has never been empirically measured, quantified, and then attributed to so called green house gasses.

That being the case, upon what actual evidence do you even base your claim that AGW exists?

I asked a simple question. Do you deny that AGW is real or not.

 

[Crepitus]

So, do you deny it then?

Can you offer any empirical evidence that AGW exists? Anything at all that would demonstrate that what is happening in the climate now is somehow different from anything that has happened in the past? Anything at all?

Does that mean "yes"?

 

[Crepitus]

● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

—NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.

Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?

Absolutely

Then that makes you, by the definition of the word, a denier.

 

[SSDD]

Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?

1. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

2. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere.

3. The hypothesized warming due to mankind's burning of hydrocarbon fuels, which is the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has never been empirically measured, quantified, and then attributed to so called green house gasses.

That being the case, upon what actual evidence do you even base your claim that AGW exists?

I asked a simple question. Do you deny that AGW is real or not.

Climate change is real...and natural...there is no observed, measured evidence in existence that favors the AGW hypothesis over natural variability....therefore, there is no reason to suspect that the change we have seen is anything other than natural.

 

[SSDD]

● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

—NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.

Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?

Absolutely

Then that makes you, by the definition of the word, a denier.

What word would you use to describe a person who rejects empirical evidence that his hypothesis is wrong in favor of flawed mathematical models that are unable to reproduce reality but support his belief?

I am perfectly willing to accept actual observed, measured evidence to support a hypothesis...you are not willing to accept observed, measured evidence which falsifies that hypothesis...alas, it is you who is the true denier...

 

[westwall]

● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

—NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.

Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?

Yes. I DENY it. Climate change is a natural process and there is ZERO empirical data to show that man has had any impact on global temperatures at all. None.

 

[fncceo]

I regret my life choices!

 

[Karl Rand]

Yes. I DENY it. Climate change is a natural process and there is ZERO empirical data to show that man has had any impact on global temperatures at all. None.

So what’s the weather like on your planet?

 

[westwall]

Yes. I DENY it. Climate change is a natural process and there is ZERO empirical data to show that man has had any impact on global temperatures at all. None.

So what’s the weather like on your planet?

The same as your planet. Try doing some research instead of quoting propaganda. That seems to be the limit of your capacity.

 

[HenryBHough]

So in Creepy's definition dinosaur farts cause the rising temperatures that killed them off. Provided he/she/it accepts that there ever were dinosaurs and that, until humankind, Earth's climate was stable and idyllic.

Or maybe that was just on his/her/its home planet?

 

[SSDD]

Yes. I DENY it. Climate change is a natural process and there is ZERO empirical data to show that man has had any impact on global temperatures at all. None.

So what’s the weather like on your planet?

The same as your planet. Try doing some research instead of quoting propaganda. That seems to be the limit of your capacity.

These unfortunates who have no informed opinion...only the one they were given by someone with a political agenda are something else aren't they? From my point of view, I don't see how someone could be so duped but it damned sure happens....and apparently it happens a lot. Not a skeptical bone in their bodies.