The entire world sees elderly Joe failing and .Aussie calls him "Confusion in Chief"..

[hadit]

exactly how is dark brandon - quid pro quo?

Oh, he earned that a long time ago. You remember it.

 

[Hollie]

of course i can defend dark brandon.

i just did. you can't refute any of it on either side of that meme.

You just copied and pasted something you stole elsewhere. That’s what you describe as defending Dark Brandon?

You even stole the one with the insurrection™ slogan.

I don’t have a need to refute your silly cutting and pasting.

 

[playtime]

Oh, he earned that a long time ago. You remember it.

lol .... noooooooo.... he didn't 'earn it' ... it was steeped in bullshit faux news about oh let's see ... ukraine?

amiright?

 

[hadit]

lol .... noooooooo.... he didn't 'earn it' ... it was steeped in bullshit faux news about oh let's see ... ukraine?

amiright?

Of course, you don't think he earned it. You wouldn't if he put it on a T-shirt. That's irrelevant and that's him. Say "Quid Pro Joe" and everyone knows who you're talking about.

 

[Hollie]

lol .... noooooooo.... he didn't 'earn it' ... it was steeped in bullshit faux news about oh let's see ... ukraine?

amiright?

Sky News has lots of fun with Dark Brandon.

 

[playtime]

You just copied and pasted something you stole elsewhere.

stole? naw - i don't steal anything. something you can't say about yer chosen one.

That’s what you describe as defending Dark Brandon?

only an itty bitty little bit. wanna go thru all of the compare & CONtrast between yer conman & DB?

You even stole the one with the insurrection™ slogan.

awwww.... i get it - you can't post memes. probably don't know how. too bad 4u.

I don’t have a need to refute your silly cutting and pasting.

okey dokey!

fact is donny has 91 indictments against him.

AND he's old.

 

[playtime]

Of course, you don't think he earned it. You wouldn't if he put it on a T-shirt. That's irrelevant and that's him. Say "Quid Pro Joe" and everyone knows who you're talking about.

uh-huh.

Here’s What Happened With The Bidens And Ukraine
Lisette Voytko Forbes Staff
(Updated: 11:43 a.m. EST, 10/4/2019)

Topline: President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, repeatedly claimed that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden engaged in corruption while the two had dealings in Ukraine.

But no evidence of corruption has ever been found⁠—here’s what actually happened:

• In May 2014, Hunter Biden took a board seat on Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings. He was reportedly paid $50,000 per month.
• Burisma had ties to Ukraine’s previous president Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted from office.
• As vice president, Joe Biden was tasked with reducing corruption in Ukraine after Yanukovych⁠—eventually charged with “mass killing of civilians”⁠— exiled himself to Crimea amid threats of civil war.
• The overlap between the vice president and his son raised concerns over a potential conflict of interest. The Obama White House said there was no issue with Hunter Biden’s work, and that no conflict of interest existed.
• In 2016, and with the support of other world leaders, Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of U.S. aid unless Ukraine’s leaders fired the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, for being too soft on corruption⁠⁠—which they did.
• Before Shokin was fired, he had been conducting an investigation of Burisma, and Hunter Biden allegedly was a subject. But the investigation had been inactive for over a year by the time Joe Biden pushed for Shokin’s ouster.
• Hunter Biden stepped down from his Burisma board seat in April 2019. He had been offered another term but refused because it could possibly hurt Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
• Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine, testified in an October 3 hearing before Congress that he warned Giuliani that he was being given “untrustworthy” information about the Bidens. Volker resigned his post September 28 after being named in the whistleblower report.
• Ukraine’s current top prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka said October 4 he will review all old cases involving Burisma. He did not say when the review will be completed, or if the cases will be re-opened.

Here’s What Happened With The Bidens And Ukraine

Why Was Ukraine's Top Prosecutor Fired? The Issue At The Heart Of The Dispute Gripping Washington
September 24, 2019 13:31 GMT

• By Christopher Miller

"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.

They include the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the U.S. government, foreign investors, and Ukrainian advocates of reform.

Why Was Ukraine's Top Prosecutor Fired? The Issue At The Heart Of The Dispute Gripping Washington

Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases
Courtney Subramanian
USA TODAY

It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
Shokin's inaction prompted international calls for his ouster and ultimately resulted in his removal by Ukraine's parliament.
Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.

"Civil society organizations in Ukraine were pressing for his resignation," Kaleniuk said, "but no one would have cared if there had not been voices from outside this country calling on him to go."

What really happened when Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor

 

[Hollie]

stole? naw - i don't steal anything. something you can't say about yer chosen one.




only an itty bitty little bit. wanna go thru all of the compare & CONtrast between yer conman & DB?




awwww.... i get it - you can't post memes. probably don't know how. too bad 4u.



okey dokey!

fact is donny has 91 indictments against him.

AND he's old.

So… your usual inability to defend Dark Brandon causes you to lash out at Trump like a petulant child.

 

[Hollie]

uh-huh.

Here’s What Happened With The Bidens And Ukraine
Lisette Voytko Forbes Staff
(Updated: 11:43 a.m. EST, 10/4/2019)

Topline: President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, repeatedly claimed that Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden engaged in corruption while the two had dealings in Ukraine.

But no evidence of corruption has ever been found⁠—here’s what actually happened:

• In May 2014, Hunter Biden took a board seat on Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings. He was reportedly paid $50,000 per month.
• Burisma had ties to Ukraine’s previous president Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted from office.
• As vice president, Joe Biden was tasked with reducing corruption in Ukraine after Yanukovych⁠—eventually charged with “mass killing of civilians”⁠— exiled himself to Crimea amid threats of civil war.
• The overlap between the vice president and his son raised concerns over a potential conflict of interest. The Obama White House said there was no issue with Hunter Biden’s work, and that no conflict of interest existed.
• In 2016, and with the support of other world leaders, Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of U.S. aid unless Ukraine’s leaders fired the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, for being too soft on corruption⁠⁠—which they did.
• Before Shokin was fired, he had been conducting an investigation of Burisma, and Hunter Biden allegedly was a subject. But the investigation had been inactive for over a year by the time Joe Biden pushed for Shokin’s ouster.
• Hunter Biden stepped down from his Burisma board seat in April 2019. He had been offered another term but refused because it could possibly hurt Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
• Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine, testified in an October 3 hearing before Congress that he warned Giuliani that he was being given “untrustworthy” information about the Bidens. Volker resigned his post September 28 after being named in the whistleblower report.
• Ukraine’s current top prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka said October 4 he will review all old cases involving Burisma. He did not say when the review will be completed, or if the cases will be re-opened.

Here’s What Happened With The Bidens And Ukraine

Why Was Ukraine's Top Prosecutor Fired? The Issue At The Heart Of The Dispute Gripping Washington
September 24, 2019 13:31 GMT

• By Christopher Miller

"Ironically, Joe Biden asked Shokin to leave because the prosecutor failed [to pursue] the Burisma investigation, not because Shokin was tough and active with this case," Kaleniuk said.

Ukrainian prosecutors have described no evidence indicating that Biden sought to help his son by getting Shokin dismissed -- and have suggested that they have not discovered any such evidence.

But there is a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired.

They include the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the U.S. government, foreign investors, and Ukrainian advocates of reform.

Why Was Ukraine's Top Prosecutor Fired? The Issue At The Heart Of The Dispute Gripping Washington

Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases
Courtney Subramanian
USA TODAY

It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
Shokin's inaction prompted international calls for his ouster and ultimately resulted in his removal by Ukraine's parliament.
Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.

"Civil society organizations in Ukraine were pressing for his resignation," Kaleniuk said, "but no one would have cared if there had not been voices from outside this country calling on him to go."

What really happened when Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor

Oops. Dark Brandon maintained he had no involvement with Hunter’s business partners and never made a dime from the Chinese.

Biden met with chairman of Chinese energy firm Hunter did business with in 2017, ex-associate testifies

President Biden met with the chairman of the Chinese energy firm Hunter Biden sought to create a joint venture with at the Four Seasons in Washington D.C. in 2017, a former business partner of the first son told congressional investigators.

www.foxnews.com

 

[playtime]

Cool, then he should had recommended him for prosecution seeing as that his conclusion not to prosecute was based solely on "mitigating factors" related to Biden's "diminished faculties", NOT the merits of the actual case. The case itself is a slam dunk with Biden on tape admitting in 2017 that he had classified documents. He never attempted to return them OR secure them at that time despite clearly knowing they were in his possession.

...

Many will conclude that a president who knew he was illegally storing classified documents in his home would not have allowed a search of his home to discover those documents and then answered the government's questions afterwards. while various parts of this argument are debatable, we expect the argument will carry real force for many reasonable jurors. These jurors will conclude that Mr. Biden-a powerful, sophisticated person with access to the best advice in the world would not have handed the government classified documents from his own home on a silver platter if he had willfully retained those documents for years. Just as a person who destroys evidence and lies often proves his guilt, a person who produces evidence and cooperates will be seen by many to be innocent. To prove that Mr. Biden ... willfully retained the Afghanistan documents, the government must establish that he acted "with a bad purpose either to disobey or to disregard the law. Reasonable jurors could conclude that Mr. Biden discovered the
Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home and then forgot about them almost immediately. Such jurors would likely acquit him.
pp 214-215
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

 

[playtime]

Oops. Dark Brandon maintained he had no involvement with Hunter’s business partners and never made a dime from the Chinese.

Biden met with chairman of Chinese energy firm Hunter did business with in 2017, ex-associate testifies

President Biden met with the chairman of the Chinese energy firm Hunter Biden sought to create a joint venture with at the Four Seasons in Washington D.C. in 2017, a former business partner of the first son told congressional investigators.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Hollie]

...

Many will conclude that a president who knew he was illegally storing classified documents in his home would not have allowed a search of his home to discover those documents and then answered the government's questions afterwards. while various parts of this argument are debatable, we expect the argument will carry real force for many reasonable jurors. These jurors will conclude that Mr. Biden-a powerful, sophisticated person with access to the best advice in the world would not have handed the government classified documents from his own home on a silver platter if he had willfully retained those documents for years. Just as a person who destroys evidence and lies often proves his guilt, a person who produces evidence and cooperates will be seen by many to be innocent. To prove that Mr. Biden ... willfully retained the Afghanistan documents, the government must establish that he acted "with a bad purpose either to disobey or to disregard the law. Reasonable jurors could conclude that Mr. Biden discovered the
Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home and then forgot about them almost immediately. Such jurors would likely acquit him.
pp 214-215
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

A long, tedious cut and paste from Biden’s lackeys in the corrupt justice department.

Lovely!

 

[Hollie]

View attachment 901718

You best posts are those limited to cutting and pasting memes.

 

[playtime]

You best posts are those limited to cutting and pasting memes.

only second to my unbiased credible link that show undeniable facts.

 

[Arlette]

You’re among others who have cut and pasted that image.

As noted, you can’t defend Biden so you’re left with:

“ but … but … but… but what about…”?

What's there to defend? We knew Biden was old back in 20

 

[playtime]

You best posts are those limited to cutting and pasting memes.

like this:

The entire world sees elderly Joe failing and .Aussie calls him "Confusion in Chief"..

& thsi:

The entire world sees elderly Joe failing and .Aussie calls him "Confusion in Chief"..

in case you missed them.

 

[Hollie]

like this:

The entire world sees elderly Joe failing and .Aussie calls him "Confusion in Chief"..

& thsi:

The entire world sees elderly Joe failing and .Aussie calls him "Confusion in Chief"..

in case you missed them.

I knew you would appreciate that.

 

[bripat9643]

Biden is in better physical and mental shape than trump.

thanks for showing the forum why no one should pay attention to anything you post.

 

[Nostra]

You're a potato

OH NO ! I may never recover.

 

[Nostra]

Hur had too inject his person opinions about Good old Joe into the report because Joe Biden didn't commit the same type of crimes that Benedict Donald was charged with after his refusal to return the Documents he took with him after the American people fired him. This way Benedict Donnie's Sycophants can mischaracterize the report and pretend the two cases are somehow equal and the poor poor Dirty Don is being unfairly targeted......

Bullshit. Hur laid out multiple felonies, then had to explain why he didn’t charge Tater……because he is a vegetable who wouldn’t know WTF was happening to him in his trial.