THE END for the climate k00ks!!!

sculpture-polar-bear-iceberg-along-.jpg
 
Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.
 
Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.

Maybe they should support that in a somewhat sane fashion so they might gain some supporters instead of looking like kooky fear mongers who actually like AL Gore.
 
DAVID ROSE: The mini ice age starts here | Mail Online

Ive been waiting for a story like this for over 10 years as Ive been telling the hoplessly duped that "Man-made" golbal warming is a fraud...............

Arctic summer sea ice is expanding at mind bending rates...........and even some of the most ardent global warming k00ks are not even disputing this anymore.......

So.....yup............ahhhhhhhhhh ( draws drag on ciggy in classic Denis Leary fashion)




Its the dawn of a mini-ice age you fcukking dummies!!!!!!!:lol::lol::funnyface::funnyface::oops:

I'll bet you've been waiting for a story like that for 10 years. Too bad it's crap. Latif may be a controversial figure in the scientific community, but the blatant misinterpretation of his research continues, and his model was never designed to predict what these people suggest. And the DailyTech piece has it's own gaping problems (some old discussion of that here).

Even if this were a global-scale event, I guess some still don't get the difference between a climate trend and short-term fluctuation (something that is inherently harder to model due to greater entropy):

smooth.jpg
 
Last edited:
NO, this beast will not die. It still has lots of defenders.

Next July there will be another conference in Rio. (Winter time there, BTW) The only way Global Warming will die is if the conference gets snowed out like the one in Copenhagen did.
 
DAVID ROSE: The mini ice age starts here | Mail Online

Ive been waiting for a story like this for over 10 years as Ive been telling the hoplessly duped that "Man-made" golbal warming is a fraud...............

Arctic summer sea ice is expanding at mind bending rates...........and even some of the most ardent global warming k00ks are not even disputing this anymore.......

So.....yup............ahhhhhhhhhh ( draws drag on ciggy in classic Denis Leary fashion)




Its the dawn of a mini-ice age you fcukking dummies!!!!!!!:lol::lol::funnyface::funnyface::oops:

Its not global warming, this crazy weather pattern was written in the bible, imagine of all places the bible.
 
Rocks, save your breath. These people spend their evenings watching Hannity and O'Reily. They will believe anything they are fed by the right wing. They are the same ones who sent me an e-mail this morning telling me that Obama issued a Muslim stamp and wants to commemorate a Muslim day. They are both lies. But, it worked for the swift boaters!
 
Old Rocks reminds me of the occasional WWII Japanese soldier they find in Guam who is convinced the war is still on
 
Everyone knows that 2008 was the year global warming died, just google it!

2008: the year Man-Made Global Warming died « South Carolina Conservative

Who wrote this? Shawn Hannity? No data, no facts...only conjecture and opinion.

Are you fucking serious? Who wrote it! C'mon, at least go to the link if you're going to complain about it. It says at the top who wrote it. This article written by: _______ Can it get more frickin' obvious?
 
Damn, such impressive credentials.


Christopher Booker has been a writer and editor for magazines such as Private Eye and has a long-running column in the UK's Sunday Telegraph. Contents [hide]
1 Climate Change Skeptic
2 Articles and resources
2.1 Related SourceWatch articles
2.2 References
2.3 External resources
2.3.1 Presentations by Akasofu
2.4 External articles


Climate Change Skeptic
Booker wrote an article, titled "“The world has never seen such freezing heat,” published in the UK’s Telegraph, which purports to be a "shocking exposé of a blunder big enough potentially to bring climate change science to its knees." Yet, according to EcoWorldly, the article falls considerably short of its goal, especially in terms of its scientific integrity.[1] Booker was also a speaker at the International Conference on Climate Change (2009), a gathering of climate change skeptics organized by the conservative think tank, the Heartland Institute. His presentation was entitled, "Remember the Poor: A Christian Perspective on Energy Rationing."[2
 
Nice.

But a logical arguement supporting your denial would be neater. Just impossible, so all you have is mindless derision.

Poor Doooodeeeee.........
 
Actually, we are breathing the CO2 out of our bodies. Should we stop breathing?...
See, this is part of the problem. Half the people arguing about this issue don't even understand the basic underlying science of the carbon cycle. If we think back to our school biology, the CO2 in human breath is carbon NEUTRAL. It's produced from the oxidation of carbohydrate, which is ultimately derived from plants, which absorb atmospheric CO2 in the production of that carbohydrate. So no net change. Fossil CO2 is generated, in quantities that surpass natural uptake, from hydrocarbons that have been sequestered over geologic timescales. And nobody I know supports a return to the horse & buggy days (another straw man). What they do support is maximizing efficiency and transitioning away from fossil carbon fuels.

Guess what. Those similarly are just recycled. The time scale is just longer. It is not surpassing natural uptake. It is natural uptake. It is just earth produced carbon that has been here all along. It is time to let our children know that they are supposed to be here and they are supposed to advance civilization and that includes technology.

Enough of the fear mongering for greed already.
 
Nice.

But a logical arguement supporting your denial would be neater. Just impossible, so all you have is mindless derision.

Poor Doooodeeeee.........

Hmmmm..logical arguments. Rather comical from one who justs regurgitates the party line, attempting to spread the fear mongering propaganda of the greed meister, sell ya a carbon credit snake oil salesmen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top