Weren't these so called "scientist" screaming global cooling 35 years ago?
If you were logical in your thought processses instead of merely ideological, you'd have to wonder what would make so many scientists change their minds in a relatively short period of time. Of course, the denier position has very little to do with science and everything to do with politics. The main objection apparently is that, they just don't like Gore. I don't pay much attention to those types, because those that know the subject, discuss it. Those that don't, talk about Gore!
Gore gets brought up by the opposition for some legitimate reasons. Like why is the figurehead for AGW NOT a scientist? Why won't he debate anyone on the issue if he's so right about it? Might he have some financial reasons (carbon credits) for proporting AGW? Whether you believe in AGW or not, one has to admit, that this most vocal of spokespeople is far from credible.
No, I don't. He isn't getting this stuff out of thin air. He may be a bit dramatic in his presentation, but the gist of the science is right on.
No it didn't. He perported that CO2 drive temperature increase when the evidence says the opposite is true. He was also one that used the now infamously inaccruate hockey stick graph. he didn't present much in the way of science at all.