Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Guys the problem isnt cheating, its more of unconstitutional, if they want to pass an amendment, then it's ok, if they want to do it any other way....nope...unconstitutional.
But yeah, sure lets give Cali's votes to the popular vote.........seems kind of stupid for democrats to do that....
There is nothing unconstitutional about it. The states are free to decide how they award their electoral votes.
It's just the opposite new York has more electorals than Iowa giving it more say. Just cuz a state has less people doesn't make it any less important.
Without the electoral college many people and states would be disenfranchised. Something liberals whine about all the time.
Once again liberals show their hypocrisy and try to cheat the constitution.
Oh the horror of the majority in this country electing the president
Guys the problem isnt cheating, its more of unconstitutional, if they want to pass an amendment, then it's ok, if they want to do it any other way....nope...unconstitutional.
But yeah, sure lets give Cali's votes to the popular vote.........seems kind of stupid for democrats to do that....
There is nothing unconstitutional about it. The states are free to decide how they award their electoral votes.
I think you need to read Article 2 again, the Consitution establishes procedures for reporting of the States election results.
Not true. Many states, including California, were bound by state law to cast their electoral vote for a specific candidate.
I dont have a problem with this at all! That does not hurt one party more than the other.
Sure it does. If swing states sign on to this their votes go to the national popular vote not the state popular vote. It hurts republicans or brown wouldn't have signed it into law.
This does not stop republicans from winning, it simply attempts to circumvent the issue of a majority of Americans picking someone and that person not winning the election.
Romney is 100% different than bush
Romney is 100% different than bush
Sure he is. That's why his campaign staff and advisory board are loaded with former Bush administration officials. That's why the same people who funded Bush are funding Romney.
And you can actually type this tripe with a straight face, after watching the endless Bill Clinton commercials for Obama, and after Obama just brought on John Kerry as an advisor, and after Obama loaded his administration with former Clinton cronies?
No mirrors in your house, eh?
Bush ran this country like a liberal. Plus he had 9-11 to deal with.
Obama continued almost all of Bush's policies and he has yet to pass any kind of budget plan.
The economy is not getting better. It's stagnant. If you worked in the real world you would see it with your own eyes and not be propagandized by the liberal media's distorting the truth in order to get obama re-elected.
More people have given up looking for work choosing to retire early or go on unemoyment or welfare.
This country is in decline. And 4 more years of Obama will only keep us on the same downhill slope.
Romney is 100% different than bush or Obama. And his business experience will bring new life to a dying economy.
Romney is 100% different than bush
Sure he is. That's why his campaign staff and advisory board are loaded with former Bush administration officials. That's why the same people who funded Bush are funding Romney.