The Democratic Party of the United States Of America

His problem is that he belongs on Stormfront... not here.

Why not argue the points Scotty made instead of making snide comments?

I heard someone suggest that you're an attorney, I doubt that that is true since you obviously can't present a valid argument.

Speaking of stormfront, exactly what do you know about that website? Have you ever visited it? How is it different than blackvoices.com or Freeman Institute.com?

What's to argue? If he doesn't believe the Democratic party represents his best interests, he doesn't have to be a Democrat, or support Democrats.

Ah, yes, but he feels he is owed privilege wherever and whenever he chooses to squat...


so very very sad, but here is a song for him:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqHVq42xbiQ"]YouTube - Jesse Colin Young - Rye Whiskey[/ame]
 
So go join the Ku Klux Klan, then.

And Democrats don't MOCK the American Dream, they just mostly don't believe that it is the exclusive birthright of those like you, white males, who have had all the opportunities, all the time, since forever, and STILL cannot SUPER succeed. Boo freakin' hoo, life is hard sometimes, and many times others win the race, even when you thought you had it all locked up and won, bunny rabbit!

You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.


You are SUCH A WHINER!

:eek: He just ripped you apart.
 
The message I get from mainstream American media (CNN, MSNBC) The Democratic party of America is now Anti-White and Anti-Christian I see so many Democrats mocking my culture and religion. modern Day Democrats mock the traditional American dream. I do not feel as though the American Democrat Party represents my White, Christian standard.

We dont want religious nuts in the Democratic party any way though a true Christian who follows the teaching of and examples set by Christ are more than welcome, but keep the nutty evangelist types that say they are Christian but act contrarily to the teachings of Christ away.
 
You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.


You are SUCH A WHINER!

:eek: He just ripped you apart.

You freakin' wish, LOL, but here I am, and you are, I 'spose, another whiner, LMOAO....

ALL he did was state his opinion, which miirors your own bent. Am I supposed to be impressed? LOL.....
 
The message I get from mainstream American media (CNN, MSNBC) The Democratic party of America is now Anti-White and Anti-Christian I see so many Democrats mocking my culture and religion. modern Day Democrats mock the traditional American dream. I do not feel as though the American Democrat Party represents my White, Christian standard.

So go join the Ku Klux Klan, then.

And Democrats don't MOCK the American Dream, they just mostly don't believe that it is the exclusive birthright of those like you, white males, who have had all the opportunities, all the time, since forever, and STILL cannot SUPER succeed. Boo freakin' hoo, life is hard sometimes, and many times others win the race, even when you thought you had it all locked up and won, bunny rabbit!

You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.

The 1964 civil rights act was opposed largely by a bi-partisan group known as the CONSERVATIVE COALITION.
 
The message I get from mainstream American media (CNN, MSNBC) The Democratic party of America is now Anti-White and Anti-Christian I see so many Democrats mocking my culture and religion. modern Day Democrats mock the traditional American dream. I do not feel as though the American Democrat Party represents my White, Christian standard.

So go join the Ku Klux Klan, then.

And Democrats don't MOCK the American Dream, they just mostly don't believe that it is the exclusive birthright of those like you, white males, who have had all the opportunities, all the time, since forever, and STILL cannot SUPER succeed. Boo freakin' hoo, life is hard sometimes, and many times others win the race, even when you thought you had it all locked up and won, bunny rabbit!

You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.

I love the attempt to give Goldwater a pass in the above. HEE-larious!!!
 
:eek: He just ripped you apart.

You freakin' wish, LOL, but here I am, and you are, I 'spose, another whiner, LMOAO....

ALL he did was state his opinion, which miirors your own bent. Am I supposed to be impressed? LOL.....

My opinion is wrought with facts, yours is wrought with contempt.

You are right about me having total contempt for you. And, when it comes to having to face any "competition" in life, in general, you are certainly overwrought!
 
So go join the Ku Klux Klan, then.

And Democrats don't MOCK the American Dream, they just mostly don't believe that it is the exclusive birthright of those like you, white males, who have had all the opportunities, all the time, since forever, and STILL cannot SUPER succeed. Boo freakin' hoo, life is hard sometimes, and many times others win the race, even when you thought you had it all locked up and won, bunny rabbit!

You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.

The 1964 civil rights act was opposed largely by a bi-partisan group known as the CONSERVATIVE COALITION.

Republican senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona voted against the bill, remarking, "You can't legislate morality." Goldwater had supported previous attempts to pass Civil Rights legislation in 1957 and 1960. The reason for his opposition to the 1964 bill was Title II, which he viewed as a violation of individual liberty. Most Democrats from the Southern states opposed the bill, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV).

Title II
Outlawed discrimination in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private."

This is how each party voted:

The original House version:

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

Cloture in the Senate:

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version:

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
 
You freakin' wish, LOL, but here I am, and you are, I 'spose, another whiner, LMOAO....

ALL he did was state his opinion, which miirors your own bent. Am I supposed to be impressed? LOL.....

My opinion is wrought with facts, yours is wrought with contempt.

You are right about me having total contempt for you. And, when it comes to having to face any "competition" in life, in general, you are certainly overwrought!

What do you know about my life?
 
Why not argue the points Scotty made instead of making snide comments?

I heard someone suggest that you're an attorney, I doubt that that is true since you obviously can't present a valid argument.

Speaking of stormfront, exactly what do you know about that website? Have you ever visited it? How is it different than blackvoices.com or Freeman Institute.com?

Actually, I've been a practicing attorney since I was 23.

And that being the case, I don't waste my breath arguing with people who have nothing, nada, zippo to offer. capice?

for example, the moron O/P... I don't argue with racist trash. There's no point to it and he hasn't raised any "points" and is only deserving of snide comments... because that is what you do with ignorance. You make fun of it. You isolate it. You exclude it. You do not legitimize it by arguing it as if they have raised some valid "point" or imparted some "wisdom".

It's that whole don't try to teach a pig to talk thing.

Thanks for playing. Did you feel validated that I addressed you? You know, since you seemed so desperate for that. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
The message I get from mainstream American media (CNN, MSNBC) The Democratic party of America is now Anti-White and Anti-Christian I see so many Democrats mocking my culture and religion. modern Day Democrats mock the traditional American dream. I do not feel as though the American Democrat Party represents my White, Christian standard.


Way to make shit up to attempt to demonize the other side instead of bring up real, factual reasons you have a problem

Give me a break, considering most are religious themselves. Ugh, can you people ever be honest?
 
Last edited:
The message I get from mainstream American media (CNN, MSNBC) The Democratic party of America is now Anti-White and Anti-Christian I see so many Democrats mocking my culture and religion. modern Day Democrats mock the traditional American dream. I do not feel as though the American Democrat Party represents my White, Christian standard.

I get my news from a variety of sources. What I've lerned is if you want the whole story, read Reuter and the Associated Press. Everyone else picks and chooses news from these two sources that the media outlet feels serves their audience. Maybe you should expand your news sources you'd get a different view of the Democratic and Republican parties.
 
Why not argue the points Scotty made instead of making snide comments?

I heard someone suggest that you're an attorney, I doubt that that is true since you obviously can't present a valid argument.

Speaking of stormfront, exactly what do you know about that website? Have you ever visited it? How is it different than blackvoices.com or Freeman Institute.com?

Actually, I've been a practicing attorney since I was 23.

And that being the case, I don't waste my breath arguing with people who have nothing, nada, zippo to offer. capice?

for example, the moron O/P... I don't argue with racist trash. There's no point to it and he hasn't raised any "points" and is only deserving of snide comments... because that is what you do with ignorance. You make fun of it. You isolate it. You exclude it. You do not legitimize it by arguing it as if they have raised some valid "point" or imparted some "wisdom".

It's that whole don't try to teach a pig to talk thing.

Thanks for playing. Did you feel validated that I addressed you? You know, since you seemed so desperate for that. :cuckoo:

In other words you have nothing!
 
You've just proven Scotty's point! Bravo!!:clap2:

Fact is being a white male doesn't mean you automatically have opportunities that minorites don't. That's a crock of shit dreamed up by liberal democrats. Democrats have been the "racist party"of record for decades. All one has to do is look at their history. It was the republican party that pushed for civil rights legislations, it was a republican president that signed the proclamation that emancipated slaves.

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

For further proof that democrats are not looking out for minorities best interest is affirmative action. "Affirmative action" has become the touchstone of Democratic racial politics. Democrats portray anyone who opposes affirmative action as racist. But affirmative action, as currently practiced, is racist to the core. It is based on the assumption that African-Americans are incapable of competing with whites. It represents the kind of paternalistic racism that would have done honor to Calhoun. For the modern liberal Democratic racist as for the old-fashioned one, blacks are simply incapable of freedom. They will always need Ol’ Massa’s help. And woe be to any African-American who wanders off of the Democratic plantation. Ask Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, or Ward Connerly. Although they echo the call for a "color-blind society" that once characterized the vision of Martin Luther King Jr., they are pilloried as "Uncle Toms" of "Oreos" by such enforcers of the Democratic plantation system as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.

The 1964 civil rights act was opposed largely by a bi-partisan group known as the CONSERVATIVE COALITION.

Republican senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona voted against the bill, remarking, "You can't legislate morality." Goldwater had supported previous attempts to pass Civil Rights legislation in 1957 and 1960. The reason for his opposition to the 1964 bill was Title II, which he viewed as a violation of individual liberty. Most Democrats from the Southern states opposed the bill, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV).

Title II
Outlawed discrimination in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private."

This is how each party voted:

The original House version:

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

Cloture in the Senate:

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version:

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

Facts are stubborn things....
 
The 1964 civil rights act was opposed largely by a bi-partisan group known as the CONSERVATIVE COALITION.

Republican senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona voted against the bill, remarking, "You can't legislate morality." Goldwater had supported previous attempts to pass Civil Rights legislation in 1957 and 1960. The reason for his opposition to the 1964 bill was Title II, which he viewed as a violation of individual liberty. Most Democrats from the Southern states opposed the bill, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV).

Title II
Outlawed discrimination in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private."

This is how each party voted:

The original House version:

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

Cloture in the Senate:

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version:

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

Facts are stubborn things....

True and it also seems to be the liberals worst enemy.
 
Republican senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona voted against the bill, remarking, "You can't legislate morality." Goldwater had supported previous attempts to pass Civil Rights legislation in 1957 and 1960. The reason for his opposition to the 1964 bill was Title II, which he viewed as a violation of individual liberty. Most Democrats from the Southern states opposed the bill, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV).

Title II
Outlawed discrimination in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private."

This is how each party voted:

The original House version:

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

Cloture in the Senate:

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version:

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

Why did the Republican party nominate Barry Goldwater for president in 1964, after he voted AGAINST civil rights, if the Republican party was the party FOR civil rights in 1964?
 
Last edited:
My opinion is wrought with facts, yours is wrought with contempt.

You are right about me having total contempt for you. And, when it comes to having to face any "competition" in life, in general, you are certainly overwrought!

What do you know about my life?

You're a Texan. Texas seceded from Mexico to protect its right to slavery, and then seceded from the U.S. to protect that same right. So by your own logic, as you apply it to Democrats, Texans of today must be pro-slavery.
 
You are right about me having total contempt for you. And, when it comes to having to face any "competition" in life, in general, you are certainly overwrought!

What do you know about my life?

You're a Texan. Texas seceded from Mexico to protect its right to slavery, and then seceded from the U.S. to protect that same right. So by your own logic, as you apply it to Democrats, Texans of today must be pro-slavery.

Now they want to secede because we have a black president
 

Forum List

Back
Top