The definitive guide to the 2nd Amendment

[hadit]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in the first clause.

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

 

[danielpalos]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in the first clause.

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

 

[hadit]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in the first clause.

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Sorry, you are a lost cause. You won't even address things you have said, preferring to pretend they don't exist. I've destroyed your argument yet again and will continue pointing out your fallacies.

 

[danielpalos]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in the first clause.

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Sorry, you are a lost cause. You won't even address things you have said, preferring to pretend they don't exist. I've destroyed your argument yet again and will continue pointing out your fallacies.

The first clause expresses the security of a free State and the necessity of well regulated militia of the whole and entire People.

 

[P@triot]

Natural rights are Recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not implied in our Second Amendment.

If that were even remotely true, you would have 0 “natural rights”. You see, my illiterate and ignorant little friend, the Supremacy Clause establishes the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land. Which means it trumps all state and local laws.

Therefore, the federal government could snap their fingers and eliminate religion, the press, you’re right to privacy, etc. But of course, they can’t do that because our “natural rights” are all established in the U.S. Constitution. You would know that if you would bother to read it before commenting.

 

[P@triot]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in the first clause.

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Sorry, you are a lost cause. You won't even address things you have said, preferring to pretend they don't exist. I've destroyed your argument yet again and will continue pointing out your fallacies.

He’s most likely a paid Russian troll. Nobody would have the time to post the nonsense he does against everyone here on USMB unless it was their job to do so.

 

[P@triot]

The first clause expresses the security of a free State and the necessity of well regulated militia of the whole and entire People.

But much more importantly, the second clauses establishes that the people have the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[P@triot]

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

Actually, what it is “expressed” in “our” 2nd Amendment is that the people have the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[P@triot]

...there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

But there is an explicit right of the people to keep and bear arms!

 

[danielpalos]

Natural rights are Recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not implied in our Second Amendment.

If that were even remotely true,

It is completely true. Good federalists never take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise, without "having first hand look at the terrain". We call it, part of the Gettysburg doctrine.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Was puta Dan banned AGAIN for just repeating nonsense statements and never making an argument?



Dude is a damn troll of the highest order.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Natural rights are Recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not implied in our Second Amendment.

If that were even remotely true,

It is completely true. Good federalists never take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise, without "having first hand look at the terrain". We call it, part of the Gettysburg doctrine.

You know who never takes you seriously? USMB mods.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Natural rights are Recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not implied in our Second Amendment.

If that were even remotely true,

It is completely true. Good federalists never take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise, without "having first hand look at the terrain". We call it, part of the Gettysburg doctrine.

Hey, Dan.

“Well-regulated” means proper functioning.

If only States protect natural rights, why do we have federal gun laws that infringe on natural rights?

Oh, wait....you can’t answer. You’re banned.

 

[hadit]

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Sorry, you are a lost cause. You won't even address things you have said, preferring to pretend they don't exist. I've destroyed your argument yet again and will continue pointing out your fallacies.

The first clause expresses the security of a free State and the necessity of well regulated militia of the whole and entire People.

Address the first amendment.

 

[hadit]

Uh...according to who? Who says that the first clause in each amendment dictates natural rights in a constitutional amendments?!?

Why do you think you can just make shit up?

unlike the right wing?

There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment or it would say so in our Second Amendment. The security of a free State, is what is expressed.

So why are your free speech rights not dependent on you getting in a regulated group? You still haven't addressed your rather glaring blunder.

you only have a fallacy of false Cause. there are no natural rights in our Second Amendment.

Sorry, you are a lost cause. You won't even address things you have said, preferring to pretend they don't exist. I've destroyed your argument yet again and will continue pointing out your fallacies.

He’s most likely a paid Russian troll. Nobody would have the time to post the nonsense he does against everyone here on USMB unless it was their job to do so.

With a limited vocabulary to boot. Note that he cannot even talk about the first amendment and how it destroys his fantasy, but insists on twisting everything into the second.

 

[hadit]

Natural rights are Recognized and secured in State Constitutions, not implied in our Second Amendment.

If that were even remotely true,

It is completely true. Good federalists never take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise, without "having first hand look at the terrain". We call it, part of the Gettysburg doctrine.

Address the first amendment.

 

[P@triot]

More than ever, the American people get it. We have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Study: Demand for concealed carry weapons permits skyrocketing despite anti-gun campaigning

 

[P@triot]

We don’t have to piss on the U.S. Constitution to ensure children are safe...

School-security companies are thriving in the era of mass shootings

 

[P@triot]

Thank God this U.S. citizen has the right to keep and bear arms...

Store owner held at gunpoint flips the script, grabs own gun, sends crook sprinting from premises

 

[P@triot]

Thank God she has a constitutional right to keep and bear arms...

Road Rage: Man Attacks Woman Riding Motorcycle, Gets Shot Dead | Breitbart