The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again

Listen child he should be in front of a court for treason and when found guilty should be put to death. Like the constitution prescribes.


Could you point that out please?

Thank you.

WW

Article 3 - The Judicial Branch​

Section 3 - Treason​


<<Back| Table of Contents |Next>>

Treason against the United States, shallconsist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies,giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of twoWitnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except duringthe Life of the Person attainted.

18 U.S.C. § 2381 says, “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or imprisoned and fined, and incapable of holding any U.S. office.”

Thank you for correcting your post. The Constitution doesn't call for the death penalty for treason, it leaves it up to Congress and Congress put it in the United States Code.

Thank you for that. Posting a correction to a previous mis-statement shows good form.

👍

WW
 
You mean the grifter ?


28pol-swiper-carousel-3presidents-kcbm-articleLarge.jpg
 
The only way out of this is for the US Supreme Court to formally rule on whether January 6, 2021 was an Insurrection at law.

If they rule that January 6, 2021 was NOT an Insurrection at law, then Trump can go back on the ballot.

If they rule that January 6, 2021 WAS an Insurrection at law, then Trump will stay OFF the ballot.

Without formal charges of "Insurrection"? Yes.

Without a conviction on such charges? Yes.

Precedent?

A great many Confederates were prohibited from ever again holding office merely by PARTICIPATING in Insurrection.

Even though they were never formally charged or convicted.

Fast-forward 150 years or so, and that same safeguard may be conveniently applied here.
THE CIVIL WAR WAS AN INSURRECTION.

January 6th was a riot.
 
LOL, you sound triggered. Have you taken your meds today? Let me know when all this speculation comes about. Meanwhile, you can post the link where it is reported that DJT has been convicted of any criminal charge ever. I know you are one of those commies that say "guilty until proven innocent" but we don't do that in this country.

The word you're looking for is -- hypocrite

He [Hunter] failed to appear in violation of a subpoena -- he [hunter] is guilty of contempt of congress, moron.
Baldwin is guilty and he should serve time.
How odd you didn't fight for their presumption of innocence. Do you think that's only a legal theory that applies to conservatives?
 
Pretty

You’re what claiming the left is normal with three normal looking presidents with no indictments. Vs Trump with 90 plus offenses and four climinat indictments, 3 civil fraud and one sexual abuse adjudications.

.
Normal.................... :auiqs.jpg:

Pages in category "Obama administration controversies"​


Bill Clinton sexual assault and misconduct allegations​



Pages in category "Biden administration controversies"​

The following 44 pages are in this category, out of 44 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.

 
Really ? Regardless, only 4 of the 44 cabinet members Trump has had, support him for president.

An encyclopedia , dictionary and political science. You bullshit artist Humpers just making up shit doesn’t make it true. Fascism is right-wing for anyone not abnormal
What makes it "right wing" aside from the encyclopedia?
 
Normal.................... :auiqs.jpg:

Pages in category "Obama administration controversies"​


Bill Clinton sexual assault and misconduct allegations​



Pages in category "Biden administration controversies"​

The following 44 pages are in this category, out of 44 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.

Allegations ? Controversy ? No convictions. You’re funny…
Why don’t you include rumors.

GOP Admins Had 38 Times More Criminal Convictions Than Democrats, 1961-2016​

 
I wasn't aware there are any convictions......

See you change the direction of your thread, as usual, when facts show your incessant BS.
Your the one who change it to..allegations, controversies.
You’re illiterate.
 
That's all they are at the moment.........unproven allegations.

Try again.

Look in the mirror........... :biggrin:
These are dufus ?
 
These are dufus ?
Yes.......according to your article:

While there is no official scorecard, various tallies suggest that in the past 50 years criminal indictments and convictions of executive-branch officials and have been much higher during Republican administrations.

'Suggest' is no 'proof'.................. :biggrin:
 
Yes.......according to your article:

While there is no official scorecard, various tallies suggest that in the past 50 years criminal indictments and convictions of executive-branch officials and have been much higher during Republican administrations.

'Suggest' is no 'proof'.................. :biggrin:
You’re a sad sack. Fix News didn’t tell you, it’s GOP admins officials bubba.
 

Forum List

Back
Top