The Constitution in a Multicultural Society

[PoliticalChic]

It's conservatives who want to shift power down to the 50 separate states, which is literally Balkanization.

If any of you dispute that, you can start with the definition:

Balkanization, or Balkanisation, is a geopolitical term, originally used to describe the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states that are often hostile or non-cooperative with one another.

...that is almost exactly what 'state's rights' entail.

...

ell I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Every day, your posts are either lies or obfuscation, designed to change the subject.

Changing the subject?

So you didn't say this in the OP?

"Liberals are largely in favor of the balkanization..."

lol

I said nothing about your new direction, federalism.


As I said, either you lie or change the subject.


It has become a parlor game to try to guess which mode you will use each time.

You're an anti-federalist, not a federalist.

State's rights seek divide the country.

It's conservatives who want to shift power down to the 50 separate states, which is literally Balkanization.

If any of you dispute that, you can start with the definition:

Balkanization, or Balkanisation, is a geopolitical term, originally used to describe the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states that are often hostile or non-cooperative with one another.

...that is almost exactly what 'state's rights' entail.

...

Well I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Every day, your posts are either lies or obfuscation, designed to change the subject.

Changing the subject?

So you didn't say this in the OP?

"Liberals are largely in favor of the balkanization..."

lol

I said nothing about your new direction, federalism.


As I said, either you lie or change the subject.


It has become a parlor game to try to guess which mode you will use each time.

You're an anti-federalist, not a federalist.

State's rights seek divide the country.

Try though you may, as is true of your entire existence, your ploy is doomed to failure.

I am immovable, like General Jackson’s Virginians at First Manassas: a veritable stone wall. If you only had an acquaintance with history…you’d understand that.

Jackson was shot by his own men and the South lost. Read a book.

Oh! Look...a change of the subject!

How less than novel for you.

Seems the saying about old dogs and new tricks is true.

 

[g5000]

It's conservatives who want to shift power down to the 50 separate states, which is literally Balkanization.

If any of you dispute that, you can start with the definition:

Balkanization, or Balkanisation, is a geopolitical term, originally used to describe the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states that are often hostile or non-cooperative with one another.

...that is almost exactly what 'state's rights' entail.

...

ell I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Every day, your posts are either lies or obfuscation, designed to change the subject.

Changing the subject?

So you didn't say this in the OP?

"Liberals are largely in favor of the balkanization..."

lol

I said nothing about your new direction, federalism.


As I said, either you lie or change the subject.


It has become a parlor game to try to guess which mode you will use each time.

You're an anti-federalist, not a federalist.

State's rights seek divide the country.

It's conservatives who want to shift power down to the 50 separate states, which is literally Balkanization.

If any of you dispute that, you can start with the definition:

Balkanization, or Balkanisation, is a geopolitical term, originally used to describe the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states that are often hostile or non-cooperative with one another.

...that is almost exactly what 'state's rights' entail.

...

Well I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Every day, your posts are either lies or obfuscation, designed to change the subject.

Changing the subject?

So you didn't say this in the OP?

"Liberals are largely in favor of the balkanization..."

lol

I said nothing about your new direction, federalism.


As I said, either you lie or change the subject.


It has become a parlor game to try to guess which mode you will use each time.

You're an anti-federalist, not a federalist.

State's rights seek divide the country.

Try though you may, as is true of your entire existence, your ploy is doomed to failure.

I am immovable, like General Jackson’s Virginians at First Manassas: a veritable stone wall. If you only had an acquaintance with history…you’d understand that.

Jackson was shot by his own men and the South lost. Read a book.

Oh! Look...a change of the subject!

How less than novel for you.

Seems the saying about old dogs and new tricks is true.

PC says she is like Jackson. NYC points out Jackson was killed and the South lost. PC thinks NYC changed the subject. BWA-HA-HA-HA!

We are dealing with an actual inbred retard here, folks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, let's round up all the darkies, homos, intellectuals, and Muslims and put them in FEMA camps. Then gas them.

Down with multiculturalism! Homogeneity forever! We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children. Sieg Heil!

Vote for the New GOP to save Amerika.

Your simian countenance suggests a heritage unusually rich in species diversity.

"They want to throw white children and colored children into the melting pot of integration, through out of which will come a conglomerated mulatto MONGREL class of people."

Any truth to the rumor that they push your face into dough to make gorilla biscuits?

A KKK vid?

That deserves a reminder: Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

The Klan was a Southern right wing movement. How's it feel to be the direct political descendant of racist Democrats anyway?

"Eric Foner (born February 7, 1943) is an American historian. On the faculty of the Department of History at Columbia University since 1982, he writes extensively on political history, the history of freedom, the early history of the Republican Party,African American biography, Reconstruction, and historiography. Foner is the leading contemporary historian of the post-Civil WarReconstruction period,..."
Eric Foner - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

He says one thing...you the opposite.....

Hmmm....do I believe this historian, or a well identified imbecile???



Jim Crow was an example of Democrat liberal big government in action.


Your posts, an example of galactic stupidity.

 

[g5000]

The Klan was a Southern right wing movement. How's it feel to be the direct political descendant of racist Democrats anyway?

"Eric Foner (born February 7, 1943) is an American historian. On the faculty of the Department of History at Columbia University since 1982, he writes extensively on political history, the history of freedom, the early history of the Republican Party,African American biography, Reconstruction, and historiography. Foner is the leading contemporary historian of the post-Civil WarReconstruction period,..."
Eric Foner - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

He says one thing...you the opposite.....

Hmmm....do I believe this historian, or a well identified imbecile???



Jim Crow was an example of Democrat liberal big government in action.


Your posts, an example of galactic stupidity.

You pretend to like history, but you are very, very, very selective about which bits you care to recall. These are the typical tactics of tards like yourself.

"I am strong like Jackson."

"Jackson was killed and the South lost."

"Don't be changing the subject!"

BWA-HA-HA-HA!


And now the tired old saw, "The KKK wuz Democrats."

You poor inbred saps have to go back more than 50 years to find evidence of Democrats and the Klan. Ain't that a bitch? Your revisionist retardation leads you to believe the Republican Party's PRESENT racist bullshit won't be noticed by the darkies as your inner white nationalist whines about "multiculturalism".

The Southern Democrats you speak of were right wing conservatives. I know how much this stings your ass, and so you slap your hands over your eyes and ears to this fact.

They were anti-big government, pro states rights (remember how they defended segregation and even slavery as a states rights issue), anti communist, anti taxation, etc., etc., etc.

The along came the Southern Strategy to woo the racist whites away from the Democratic Party and to bring them into the Republican Party.

Here's some more history for you to soak in:
Nixon's Southern Strategy: "It's All In The Charts"

"From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that...but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."

That's a Republican strategist laying out the GOP plan going forward.

You are living proof of the success of this strategy!

So how does it feel to be the direct political descendant of Jim Crow Democrats, eh? I imagine it must feel like an Imperial Wizard discovering his great-grandmother was a black Catholic.

 

[g5000]

Gosh, I just don't understand why the darkies won't vote for the Republican Party! Those Democrats were the KKK ...a really long time ago. We modern day Republicans hate ragheads and fags and "multiculturalism", and we believe negroes on food stamps are lazy good for nothing porch monkeys who would be happier with our plan to put them back to picking cotton. Therefore, minorities have every good reason to vote for us!

Hmmm. They must vote Democratic "because gifts". Yeah. That hasta be it!

 

[Coyote]

Thread's been cleaned of incendiary litter - please remember, this is Zone 2, and even litter must have material pertaining to the topic

 

[PoliticalChic]

Earlier I said 'As a group, Liberals are largely in favor of the balkanization that follows multiculturalism.'



6. Rather than 'e pluribus unum,' out of many, one, Liberal intentions encourage Americans to view themselves as separate from other Americans.

The (Liberal) Democrat Party advances based on identity politics, having each disparate group see itself as a victim, with unique grievances that only big government can assuage.

We have an education system that twists multiculturalism to discount our American heritage. A Kansas teacher was dismissed based on his school-affiliated website, which included links to a US Army website and historical sites, being “too patriotic.” Kansas Teacher With Conservative Views Gets Job Back Fox News




7. The attack on America by the Leftist ‘fifth column’ has been neither abrupt nor obvious. Rather, it has been slow, imperceptible, and unctuous. But it has been successful. Professor James Banks, major textbook author and prime mover in the development of the development of the National Council for the Social Studies guidelines on multicultural education, “To create an authentic, democratic unum (one) with moral authority and perceived legitimacy, the pluribus (diverse peoples) must negotiate and share power.”
Educational Leadership Educating for Diversity Transforming the Mainstream Curriculum


...'power shared'.....per group???

Mandated by government?


What happened to America?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Yes, let's round up all the darkies, homos, intellectuals, and Muslims and put them in FEMA camps. Then gas them.

Down with multiculturalism! Homogeneity forever! We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children. Sieg Heil!

Vote for the New GOP to save Amerika.

Your simian countenance suggests a heritage unusually rich in species diversity.

"They want to throw white children and colored children into the melting pot of integration, through out of which will come a conglomerated mulatto MONGREL class of people."

Any truth to the rumor that they push your face into dough to make gorilla biscuits?

A KKK vid?

That deserves a reminder: Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

Was Nathan Bedford Forrest a liberal? He founded, or co-founded, the Klan. He was a Democrat.

Was he a liberal or a conservative?

 

[NYcarbineer]

a. The Constitution takes precedence over religious loyalties.
That is true for two of the three major religions.

You really think Christian Conservatives put our Government first, and God second?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Klan was a Southern right wing movement. How's it feel to be the direct political descendant of racist Democrats anyway?

Even for a Communist, you are incredibly fucking stupid.

G5000 is a "new improved democrat, now hating white people."

Here it the thing stupid fuck, just because you are trained to hate a different color doesn't change that fact that you and your fellow democrats still judge, and hate, based on the color of another's skin..

 

[Uncensored2008]

Was Nathan Bedford Forrest a liberal? He founded, or co-founded, the Klan. He was a Democrat.

Was he a liberal or a conservative?

Bedford was a collectivist, viewing people as the rightful property of the state.

Just as you do.

 

[g5000]

The Klan was a Southern right wing movement. How's it feel to be the direct political descendant of racist Democrats anyway?

Even for a Communist, you are incredibly fucking stupid.

G5000 is a "new improved democrat, now hating white people."

Here it the thing stupid fuck, just because you are trained to hate a different color doesn't change that fact that you and your fellow democrats still judge, and hate, based on the color of another's skin..

Straw man fallacy.

And just like the white nationalists, your pathetic attempt to label those who oppose your naked bigotry as "cultural marxists" is amusing.

 

[g5000]

Was Nathan Bedford Forrest a liberal? He founded, or co-founded, the Klan. He was a Democrat.

Was he a liberal or a conservative?

Bedford was a collectivist, viewing people as the rightful property of the state.

Link?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Link?

Comrade, slavery - which was promoted, protected, and even had a war fought by you democrats to preserve, is predicated upon the concept of people as property. You DO have the requisite IQ points to grasp this, don't you?

 

[g5000]

Leaflet Circulated by the KKK in Mississippi in 1964

Here are Twenty Reasons WHY you should, if qualified,join, aid and support the White Knights of theKU KLUX KLAN of Mississippi:

• 
  1. Because it is a Christian, fraternal and benevolent organization.

• 
  2. Because it is a democratic organization, governed by its members.

• 
  3. Because it is a democratic and just organization.

• 
  4. Because it is a working organization which not only talks but ACTS.

• 
  5. Because it is a very secret organization and no one will know that you are a member.

• 
  6. Because it is a legal organization and no one can be prosecuted for being a member.

• 
  7. Because it is a politically independent organization, and is not pledged to any political party.

• 
  8. Because it is a Pro-American organization that opposes any thing, person or organization that is Un-American.
  9. Because it is an organization that is sworn to uphold the lawful Constitution of the United States of America.

10. Because it is composed of native-born, white, gentile and protestant American citizens who are sound of mind and of good moral character.

11. Because the goals of the KKK are the total segregation of the races and the total destruction of communism in all its forms.

12. Because the KKK has twice saved this nation from destruction as history clearly records.

13. Because there comes a time in the life of every man when he has to choose between the right ot wrong side of life.

14. Because there are today many alien forces entering the United States of America bent upon its destruction.

15. Because it informs its members, and an informed citizen is a good citizen.

16. Because a Christian-like brotherhood among men must be revived in America.

17. Because one of the goals of the KKK is States' Rights and complete State Sovereignty.

18. Because neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals will save out nation, for patriots always save a nation.

19. Because it is clear now that if communism is to be defeated in America, it will be done in the South and primarily in Mississippi.

20. Because the KKK needs you today to help fight America's battles.


The White Knights of the KU KLUX KLAN of Mississippi is, of necessity, a SECRET organization. The administration of our National Government is now under the actual control of atheists who are Bolsheviks by nature. As dedicated agents of Satan, they are absolutely determined to destroy Christian Civilization and all Christians. We have nothing dishonorable to hide, but we must remain SECRET, for the protection of our lives and families.

All of our members must meet a strict set of requirements:

We are looking for, and enlisting ONLY: Sober, Intelligent, Courageous, Christian, American, White men who are consciously and fully aware of the basic FACT that the physical life and earthly destiny are absolutely bound up with the Survival of this Nation, under God. Our governmental principles are precisely those of the ORIGINAL U.S. Constitution. Our members are Christians who are anxious to preserve not only their souls for all Eternity, but who are MILITANTLY DETERMINED, God willing, to save their lives, and the Life of this Nation, in order that their descendants shall enjoy the same, full, God-given blessings of True Liberty that we have been permitted to enjoy up to now.

We do not accept Jews, because they reject Christ, and, through the machinations of their International Banking Cartel, are at the root center of what we call "communism" today.

We do not accept Papists, because they bow to a Roman dictator, in direct violation of the First Commandment, and the True American Spirit of Responsible, Individual Liberty.

We do not accept Turks, Mongols, Tarters, Orientals, Negroes, nor any other person whose native background of culture is foreign to the Anglo-Saxon system of Government by responsible, FREE individual citizens.

Our governmental system is a Constitutional Republic, primarily designed to protect the Responsible, Individual Citizens from all tyranny: which selects its representatives by both the direct and the indirect Democratic process; and recognizes the necessity for the existence of an effective Loyal Opposition to any current Administration. This type of Governmental System is unique, and found only where Anglo-Saxons control the Governmental Machinery of a Nation. With rare exceptions, people of other backgrounds simply cannot comprehend the Anglo-Saxon principle of "Equal Justice under Law" and the fact that EVERY "Right" must be balanced by an accompanying Responsibility. The inherent balance and reason of this system has little or no attraction for these persons of alien culture. The generally prefer to shirk Individual Responsibility, grab up as much material wealth as they can, and accept Centralized Authority and Dictatorship, in the hope that they can buy special favors and privileges for themselves.

The conflict between these two attitudes has now become a Life and Death matter in America. The people of the non-American cultures CAN and COULD live under the Anglo-Saxon System, but they prefer to see it destroyed. The true American Anglo-Saxons, on the other hand, CAN NOT live under a Dictatorship!

This issue is clearly one of personal physical SELF-DEFENSE or DEATH for the American Anglo Saxons. The Anglo-Saxons have no choice but to defend our Constitutional Republic by every means at their command, because it is, LITERALLY, their LIFE. They will die without it.

If you are a Christian, American Anglo-Saxon who can understand the simple Truth of this Philosophy, you belong in the White Knights of the KU KLUX KLAN of Mississippi. We need your help right away. Get your Bible out and PRAY! You will hear from us.

Pretty eerie how much of that rhetoric has bled over into the diatribes we hear from faux righties like PC, eh?

"People of other backgrounds simply cannot comprehend".

Down with multiculturalism!



"[T]here are today many alien forces entering the United States of America bent upon its destruction."

Ring a bell?


Remember, this was written in 1964, under the Johnson Administration, following the Kennedy Administration:

"The administration of our National Government is now under the actual control of atheists who are Bolsheviks by nature."

"They are absolutely determined to destroy Christian Civilization and all Christians."

Did these guys go on to found Fox News?

 

[g5000]

Link?

Comrade, slavery - which was promoted, protected, and even had a war fought by you democrats to preserve, is predicated upon the concept of people as property. You DO have the requisite IQ points to grasp this, don't you?

Where you fucked up is by claiming he believed people were property of the state. That is wrong on two counts, tard.

First, black people were not considered human. Second, they were private property, not public property. You will find it impossible to provide a link that Bedford believed the state should have control over private property!

God, you just fail on so many levels one wonders how you are able to breathe and walk at the same time!

 

[g5000]

The modern day right wing bigots are the direct political descendants of the right wing bigots of the Old South. Anti-communist, anti federal government, pro states rights, but also paranoid about the atheists destroying Christianity in America, ranting against aliens, and ranting against "people of other backgrounds".

Seriously, how can they fail to see this unless they are being deliberately obtuse?

It takes a special kind of willful blindness to not acknowledge one's obvious political roots.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. "We can all imagine bad versions of multiculturalism — ones that dramatically undermine the social cohesion necessary to maintain order or defend the nation in war; ones in which many people in a modern economy speak mutually unintelligible languages; ones in which members of some subcultures feel comfortable violently attacking people, whether of their own culture or of others; and so on.....
It’s a mistake, I think, to condemn multiculturalism in general, just as it’s a mistake to praise multiculturalism in general. Rather, we should think about which forms of toleration, accommodation, and embrace of differing cultural values and behaviors are good for America — in the light of American legal and social traditions — and which are bad."
Multiculturalism For or Against National Review Online

 

[g5000]

8. "We can all imagine bad versions of multiculturalism — ones that dramatically undermine the social cohesion necessary to maintain order or defend the nation in war; ones in which many people in a modern economy speak mutually unintelligible languages; ones in which members of some subcultures feel comfortable violently attacking people, whether of their own culture or of others; and so on.....
It’s a mistake, I think, to condemn multiculturalism in general, just as it’s a mistake to praise multiculturalism in general. Rather, we should think about which forms of toleration, accommodation, and embrace of differing cultural values and behaviors are good for America — in the light of American legal and social traditions — and which are bad."
Multiculturalism For or Against National Review Online

The author of that article is an immigrant, born of a Jewish Ukrainian culture. So, of course he is going to defend multiculturalism. BWA-HA-HA-HA!

I guess he must be a commie Democrat since he defends multiculturalism.

Oh, wait...


But he's a WHITE immigrant, so it's cool, right?

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. "We can all imagine bad versions of multiculturalism — ones that dramatically undermine the social cohesion necessary to maintain order or defend the nation in war; ones in which many people in a modern economy speak mutually unintelligible languages; ones in which members of some subcultures feel comfortable violently attacking people, whether of their own culture or of others; and so on.....
It’s a mistake, I think, to condemn multiculturalism in general, just as it’s a mistake to praise multiculturalism in general. Rather, we should think about which forms of toleration, accommodation, and embrace of differing cultural values and behaviors are good for America — in the light of American legal and social traditions — and which are bad."
Multiculturalism For or Against National Review Online

The author of that article is an immigrant. Jewish Ukrainian culture. BWA-HA-HA-HA!

But he's a WHITE immigrant, so it's cool, right?

What, pray tell, does your post have to do with the content?

Now that I’ve seen your preparatory spittle-spewing empty rant, what is left but your signature move, soiling your shorts.