The Conetmpt Of Congress

Seeing these loser Democraps speak on TV just shows any idiot can be elected in this country if one finds a district full of idiots.

One idiot from Georgia tried to tie this Contempt Vote to some "vast right-wing conspiracy" that started the night the black messiah stole the White House. Yeah, Republicans forced Democraps, Holder and Obamination to do Fast and Furious......what a fucking moron.

Yep...Those lefties just wrote the book on deflections. Its just so funny watching them come up with one each and every day. Someday there will be a cartoon on it.
 
they're saying now that a whole bunch of pansy assed democrats are gonna walk outta the vote,, we pay em to vote but they gonna walk.. that's just like a dumb assed democrat.

If their smart they will keep walking all the way to Mexico. For sure it would be safer for them.
 
they're saying now that a whole bunch of pansy assed democrats are gonna walk outta the vote,, we pay em to vote but they gonna walk.. that's just like a dumb assed democrat.

yep, just like in Wisconsin. They'd better drive over to Maryland where they will be better received. They need to ball up and do their job.

i think obama and pelsoi stole their balls.

Wonder if they sold them to the Mexicans too?
 
cheer up WillowTree. You still have a few more years before the GOP is a permanent minority.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLbuwKwFRmA]Pup on the Pool Table - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Does everyone remember how they felt in that day the republicans walked out of a contempt vote against Meyers and Bolton in the US Attorney firing scandal? They refused to cooperate with congress in any way, they totally ignored all subpoenas to appear and were so protected by executive privilege that congress never found out a bit of firsthand information.
 
I bet their fighting with each other. If not maybe stumbling over each other.

Ahh, you seem pretty sure of yourself.

Perhaps you can show me proof of a crime being committed by holder, aside from his reluctance to show documents that he considers to be a sensitive part of an ongoing investigation to Congress?

Please, feel free.
 
That's what this is all about, you idiot. Getting the evidence

So, in other words, you have no evidence that any crime has been committed.

And Holder has made it clear that he does not want to release documents that are part of an ongoing criminal investigation, presumably because he doesn't want information leaked that might hurt said investigation or endanger the lives of the investigators.

So, Congress is throwing a little tantrum, without any proof that any crime has been committed at all, except hearsay.

And yet, you people feel that you have the right to call Holder a "criminal" and accuse him of "murder"?

Interesting.

Hmmm you don't know but its about the DOJ (Holder) getting the cartel guns with help by using ATF (since they know where to find cartel). Then they wait for crimes murders and drum up media attention and make second amendment grab (gun control) like HC. That what any rational person figures they're hiding, ATF whistle blower to
 
I bet their fighting with each other. If not maybe stumbling over each other.

Ahh, you seem pretty sure of yourself.

Perhaps you can show me proof of a crime being committed by holder, aside from his reluctance to show documents that he considers to be a sensitive part of an ongoing investigation to Congress?

Please, feel free.

Why don't you contact the Perry family. Im sure they will straighten you out fast and furiusly.
 
That's what this is all about, you idiot. Getting the evidence

So, in other words, you have no evidence that any crime has been committed.

And Holder has made it clear that he does not want to release documents that are part of an ongoing criminal investigation, presumably because he doesn't want information leaked that might hurt said investigation or endanger the lives of the investigators.

So, Congress is throwing a little tantrum, without any proof that any crime has been committed at all, except hearsay.

And yet, you people feel that you have the right to call Holder a "criminal" and accuse him of "murder"?

Interesting.

Our evidence is a dead border patrol agent and hundreds of dead Mexican citizens.
Our evidence is a failure by the Attorney General to provide documents requested so that we may learn who approved of the operation. Our probable cause is that AG holder has backtracked repeatedly when faced with evidence that contradicts his sworn statement, and finally, our evidence is that the President of the United States now appears complicit in a cover-up.
If there is no conspiracy to hide the truth, why not comply with the subpoena?
 
Bluster all you want. The TRUTH was served up on a silver platter yesterday. That Fortune article is going to spread like wild fire, and it'll open a lot of eyes up.

Not yours. Because you're an idiot. But a lot of other eyes.

then why didn't witholder comply?

He's said it numerous times. Mostly he can't comply because what Issa asked for would be illegal for Holder to give up, for starters. Remember all those AGs the Bush Administration fired and Congress wanted to know why? Yeah, Bush exec-priv'd those too, so why don't you bellyache about that?

Oh yeah, that's right...

Secondly, who cares? If the Fortune article is even 50% true this has been a ginned-up witch hunt from the start. The truth is now out there, and it's only a matter of time before all the news shows pounce on, analyze and run with it.

Mmm. Toasted Conservatives.

They weren't AGs dumbass, Bush fired several US Attorneys that he had appointed and had every right, legal and constitutional to fire them. He could have fired all 93 of them if he had wanted too.

Bush extended EP to his aides and/or advisers since he had talked with them and asked for advice. If the Presidents advisers conversations given in confidence are made public, no one will step up and give any advise.

Obama said he didn't talk to Holder about F&F, so did he lie about that too? And that is what Issa is pursuing. The coverup is sometimes worse than the crime.
 
Last edited:
Holder NOW in CIVIL Contempt as well as CRIMINAL...

*Good*

I watched a little bit of it on CSPAN and quit when I noticed 15 Dems voted for Contempt. I don't know whether that was the civil or the criminal vote.
 
then why didn't witholder comply?

He's said it numerous times. Mostly he can't comply because what Issa asked for would be illegal for Holder to give up, for starters. Remember all those AGs the Bush Administration fired and Congress wanted to know why? Yeah, Bush exec-priv'd those too, so why don't you bellyache about that?

Oh yeah, that's right...

Secondly, who cares? If the Fortune article is even 50% true this has been a ginned-up witch hunt from the start. The truth is now out there, and it's only a matter of time before all the news shows pounce on, analyze and run with it.

Mmm. Toasted Conservatives.

They weren't AGs dumbass, Bush fired several US Attorneys that he had appointed and had every right, legal and constitutional to fire them. He could have fired all 93 of them if he had wanted too.

Bush extended EP to his aides and/or advisers since he had talked with them and asked for advice. If the Presidents advisers conversations given in confidence are made public, no one will step up and give any advise.

Obama said he didn't talk to Holder about F&F, so did he lie about that too? And that is what Issa is pursuing. The coverup is sometimes worse than the crime.

You're right. They were US Attorneys. Still doesn't mean I'm not right that you and your ConservaPig friends are all massive hypocrites. But hey man, if you guys want to go down in history like this, have at!
 
Hmmm you don't know but its about the DOJ (Holder) getting the cartel guns with help by using ATF (since they know where to find cartel). Then they wait for crimes murders and drum up media attention and make second amendment grab (gun control) like HC. That what any rational person figures they're hiding, ATF whistle blower to

There is no evidence of any of that.

Not on single shred of evidence.

There was one e-mail indicating that the ATF thought that the information they were gathering about how guns were getting to Mexican cartels would be useful for convincing people that stricter gun enforcement was needed, and that was it.

This does not indicate, in any way, that this was the reason for the operation.

Trying to tie this in as a motivation for some sort of conspiracy is desperate reaching, at best, and there is absolutely no evidence to back it up.
 
Why don't you contact the Perry family. Im sure they will straighten you out fast and furiusly.

The Perry family has every reason to be upset. Perhaps they should crusade for tougher regulation on gun sales in Arizona.

Whether ATF agents had been trying to catch the gun-runners or not, those guns still would have been sold and crossed the border, just like tens of thousands of weapons like them have in the past.
 
Our evidence is a dead border patrol agent and hundreds of dead Mexican citizens.

Who would have been dead anyway, even if the ATF had never been involved.

Our evidence is a failure by the Attorney General to provide documents requested so that we may learn who approved of the operation.

Which is part of an ongoing investigation, where leaks might cost lives.

Our probable cause is that AG holder has backtracked repeatedly when faced with evidence that contradicts his sworn statement,

See above.

and finally, our evidence is that the President of the United States now appears complicit in a cover-up.

To protect an ongoing investigation.

If there is no conspiracy to hide the truth, why not comply with the subpoena?

See above.

None of this is evidence of anything except Holder's unwillingness to talk to Congress.

And since Obama gave him cover, he doesn't have to.

So, this is pretty much all a tantrum being thrown by Congress over nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top