The Cancer Pandemic

[badger2]

Dichapetalum ruhlandii was named after the botanist, Wilhelm Ruhland.

Wilhelm Ruhland
Wilhelm Ruhland – Wikipedia

 

[badger2]

The link is Kait's use of a tanning bed likely having induced the melanoma:

'Dichapetalaceae. In Tanganyika, the powdered leaf of Dichipetalum braunii Engl. & Krause is applied topically to sores, despite the fact that the plant is regarded as being very poisonous, the local African from early times being aware of its danger to their stock. Braun reports the death of two sheep an hour after having eaten the leaf.'
(Watt and Breyer-Brandwidjk, op cit)

 

[Eaglewings]

Cancer is a billion dollar industry, if you have ever seen sayings that say " they want to keep you sick" that is exactly why it is not a conspiracy.
Keeping people ill makes the medical industry billions per year. The claimed research for this or that isn't always to help the public it generates money and more money.

Rather than march for the cure MARCH FOR THE GAWD DAM CAUSE!!!

I am a 6 year cancer survivor x2 and you are right Mindwars.. What you are saying is true.

People would be shocked to see what really goes on, and it is corrupt as hell.

1 bag of chemo is $10,000 - to $100,000 x 6 or for some for the rest of their life's

Surgeries, radiation, doctors,


Big Pharma wants you to stay sick..



.

 

[badger2]

Kait's 3-4 Ipilimumab treatments cost $200,000.

 

[badger2]

We are still searching for the fatty acid link to Kait's melanoma and fluorine. In the meantime, more evidence for African Dichapetalum as playing a role in the design of pharmaceuticals:

'Dichipetalum sp. The Northern Sotho maintain that the handling of the very young leaf causes a tingling and burning sensation of the skin, an effect not found with the old leaf....The poisonous properties of the plant were at one time thought to be due to the presence of cyanogenic glucoside, indeed the Imperial Institute isolated hydrocyanic acid from the leaf. Later, however, working with material of varying degrees of maturity, Imperial Institute was unable to find either glycosides or alkaloids but isolated two resins, one easily soluble, the other soluble with difficulty in alcohol.

These are both toxic. There is no doubt, in the light of more recent work, that the toxic principle is not a cyanogenic glucoside. Green isolated a a clear, pale yellow thermostabile, syrupy substance, soluble in water and aqueous alcochol but insoluble in absolute alcohol. A rabbit which received 0.1 gm. per kilo subcutaneously of this principle died in half an hour.....The yellow syrup, given to a cat, by the mouth, produces death with symptoms of gastro-intestinal irritation and convulsions.. The brown powder given to a rabbit produces death without apparent symptoms. Both the yellow syrup and brown powder, injected subcutaneously into the frog, produce death with a peculiar yellow coloration of the skin.An acid environment (dilute acetic acid at room temperature) produces no effect on the toxicity of extracts of the plant.

The elusive toxic principle of this plant was ultimately tracked down by Marais, who proved that it is fluoroacetic acid, FCH2COOH, the dry leaf containing 15 mg/gm. One of the reasons for its elusiveness is that it is water soluble and insoluble in most of the commonly used organic solvents.'....poisoning is often hastened by animals drinking after ingesting the leaf Ramsey's thioindigo test is a true indicator of the presence of monofluoroacetate in the plant.'
(Watt & Breyer-Brandwidjk, op cit)

 

[badger2]

'Just over a month had passed since Kait began her journey with Zelboraf, and it had noticeably taken its toll on her. The negative side effects of the poison were increasing to the point where she could no longer keep anything down in her stomach. She was miserable. Malnourished, dehydrated, and becoming so weak she could hardly do anything, qave had no choice but to have her admitted to the hospital to receive IV fluids. Kait's body desperately needed water and nutrients.'
(Ruhland, op cit)

 

[badger2]

'Çomparing the most recent scans to images taken months earlier, it was clear, the five masses in Kait's brain had decreased significantly. Some had almost completely vanished, and the others had shrunk by more than 50%. We were thrilled by the news! Was it from the focused radiation or from the Zelboraf? It was impossible to tell. But, what mattered was that we were seeing results inn the most difficult area to treat....As assumed, the tumors in her body had decreased all over, and still, none had appeared in any organs. Throughout Kait's entire journey with melanoma, not once did a body scan reveal tumor growth in any of her organs, which included her liver, lungs, bones, etc., remaining only in the fatty tissue in her body. Of course, it did make its way up to her brain, the worst possible spot it could have decided to take refuge.'
(Ruhland, op cit)

We think that this excerpt links Kait's melanoma to the Spanish study for CD36 and metastasis.

 

[badger2]

''Chenoweth and his co-workers, and Guruswami have made an extensive study of the pharmacology of fluoroacetate and the following epitome is based on these studies. Death in acute fluoroacetate poisoning results either from ventricular fibrillation or excessive stimulation of the central nervous system....The circulatory effects in the rabbit, the goat, the horse, the spider monkey, the rhesus monkey, the cat and the pig result from: depression of the exicitation and conduction systems in the heart; the developing of myocardial foci of excitation; depression of the cardiac muscle. In the rabbit, goat, horse, and spider monkey, a fatal result is due to ventricular fibrillation. In the dog, guinea-pig, and frog (Rana) the central nervous system is primarily affected, with epileptiform convulsions and death from respiratory paralysis.

.... In regard to the mode of action, Chenoweth is of the opinion that it is not due primarily to inhibition of the tricarboxylic acid cycle by fluoroacetate and that the signs and symptoms of fluoroacetate poisoning cannot be ascribed to accumulation of citrate. The factors of dosage and duration of poisoning with the fluoro-fatty acids are, however, realted to the accumulation of citrate.'

Thus, Gibbs does link the plants mentioned to fluorine accumulation in fatty acids, thus linking CD36 to melanoma metastasis in the Spanish study.

Kait's seizure, however, came (before[italics]) the Zelboraf, and post-Ipilimumab:

''All of a sudden....DAD! She's "SEIZING!!!"

Immediately I felt a crack ripple through my heart. Time froze. In slow motion, I watched Kait's body sink to the floor as Dale held her in his arms, easing her to the ground. Likely preventing severe injury. Kait began convulsing.'
(Ruhland, op cit)

 

[badger2]

The origin of Kait's melanoma lesion is unknown, though likely caused by tanning bed radiation. The factors that caused metastasis to the brain include CD36, which is the fatty acid link to fluorine. The lead study we prefer is the Spanish study from Jan 2017:

Jan 2017 Targeting Metastasis-Initiating Cells Through the Fatty Acid Receptor CD36
Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty acid receptor CD36. - PubMed - NCBI

Lipid Metabolism Fuels Cancer's Spread
Lipid Metabolism Fuels Cancer's Spread. - PubMed - NCBI

Jun 2017 New Role for CD36 in Metastasis Through Fat Intake
New role for CD36 in metastasis through fat intake. - PubMed - NCBI

 

[badger2]

In this thread, we have shown that one anti-cancer agent is a methanone derivative (a moiety also found naturally occurring in Cannabis) that has been halogenated with iodine and fluorine, linking to Kait's anti-cancer meds. In comparison, a synthetic cannabinoid is THJ-018, 1-naphthalenyl(1-pentyl-1H-indazol-3-yl)-methanone.

 

[MarathonMike]

Cancer is a billion dollar industry, if you have ever seen sayings that say " they want to keep you sick" that is exactly why it is not a conspiracy.
Keeping people ill makes the medical industry billions per year. The claimed research for this or that isn't always to help the public it generates money and more money.

Rather than march for the cure MARCH FOR THE GAWD DAM CAUSE!!!

I am a 6 year cancer survivor x2 and you are right Mindwars.. What you are saying is true.

People would be shocked to see what really goes on, and it is corrupt as hell.

1 bag of chemo is $10,000 - to $100,000 x 6 or for some for the rest of their life's

Surgeries, radiation, doctors,


Big Pharma wants you to stay sick..



.

Sadly that almost has to be true. What happens to the trillion dollar healthcare business if they start running out of "customers"? Their greatest nightmare is a totally healthy drug free old fart.

 

[badger2]

Yes, badger2 feels the political pressure, not just at the anus. The subject of basal cell carcinoma, a common skin cancer, came up in a conversation with a female doctor, who said that BCC can stem from actinic keratoses. When badger looked more closely, it was actually squamous cell carcinoma, not BCC that stems from actinic keratoses. If the latter is true, then two possibilities:

1.) The doctor is lying.

2.) The doctor is not clued up.

But more profoundly, SCC links one end of the alimentary canal to the other: colon carcinoma. The SCC we have already mentioned at USMB is the same cancer treated by Australian Aborigines for their oral SCC via the use of the tree, Codonocarpus (Hartwell, Plants Used Against Cancer).

Regards and Flatulence,
badger2
24 Jan 2018
New South Wales, Australia.

 

[badger2]

In post #52, the doctor is correct, and we were misled by a Pubmed article.
A more original article is from Ptch gene studies:

'The model that we believe best explains our results is....the observation that increased expression of the Ptch(fvb) allele can promote Hras-induced squamous cell carcinomas, but continued expression of the transgene is not required for tumour growth, suggests that Ptch contributes positively to a very early stage of carcinoma formation, possibly to the cancer stem-cell fate decision. Although loss ot Ptch and activation of SHH (sonic hedgehog) signalling are undoubtedly critical for BCC (basal cell carcinoma), the opposite may be true for SCC formation.



We propose that Ptch occupies a critical niche in determining basal or squamous cell lineage, and that both tumour types can arise from the same target cell depending on carcinogen exposure and host genetic background.'
(Wakabayashi Y. et al, Promotion of Hras-Induced Squamous Carcinomas by a Polymorphic Variant of the Patched Gene in FVB Mice, Nature, Letters, 15 Feb 2007, pp. 761-5)

 

[Mac1958]

There's always hope!
.

 

[badger2]

It's been notoriously difficult for most everyone to differentiate SCC from BCC.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Cancer is a billion dollar industry, if you have ever seen sayings that say " they want to keep you sick" that is exactly why it is not a conspiracy.
Keeping people ill makes the medical industry billions per year. The claimed research for this or that isn't always to help the public it generates money and more money.

Rather than march for the cure MARCH FOR THE GAWD DAM CAUSE!!!

What a load of tinfoil-hat, "I'm too smart to need to actually know anything" horseshit.

 

[Cecilie1200]

View attachment 119915

How America’s healthcare system will keep you sick

You really need to stop living your life trolling the Internet. It's rotting your brain.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Cave men didn't get cancer. They were dead at 30.

That's not entirely true.......

Earliest Human Cancer Found in 1.7-Million-Year-Old Bone

Then again that could have been put out there for false information , for a complex reason with many webs of " why and how come".

" IF " the article you mention was put out for false information, it would be to benefit the medical industry as to the very fact that cancer existed. Why? Because with everything stacked against us in today's world it makes it seem NONE of these issues cause cancer and that cancer existed way back then". That is not to say cancer did not exist whatsoever, buuuuut cancer if it existed back then was way, way, way lower than what it is today.

The suspected cause of cancers today....................

Cell phones / electronics
Cell phone towers and the radio wave legnths
Foods we eat
homes we live in
Clothes we wear
the air we breathe
on and on on.

Okay tell ya what, you move to some remote corner of the world, away from everything and everyone, live a pure life then one day you can lay in your cave wondering why you're dying from nothing.

LMAO I wish I could , but get the point here, the more people who become aware of these issues the more power we have against big CORPORATIONS................ get this they all invest in stocks right, big pharma pays and petitions lets say for " POT" to say ILLEGAL, why because if the pot really helps people as claimed they LOSE MONEY, WHy do you think big beer companies keep pot illegal same thing booze loses money..

If people were to actually stay healthy by eating healthy , the industry loses money...

Why do you think there has been a bandwagon against GMO FOODS, why do you think fake paid of information is being put out about GMO NOT causing cancer because ppl would actually stop buying the shit food causing cancers.

Can you see where i'm going .

I know where you're going with it but unlike you the vast majority of people don't see some vast corporate/government conspiracy, what we see is more complex and less conspiratorial.

Such as biology?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Cancer and obesity. The kings of all incurable deceases. Can you fight against the self destruction of a species? It may be a law of biology that every species must extinct itself.

But if you could cure cancer, that would mean that you cure death itself. And that means eternal hell for everyone.

Maybe the best cure against cancer is the same as against obesity, which is a watch on where you live, what you eat, and who you talk to. This may be expensive, and may define who survives the human extinction.

Curing cancer would not be "curing death". Spare us the hyperbole. Cancer is a disease, a biological malfunction, to which we simply have not found the root cause yet. It is no different in this than any of the other huge medical bugaboos that came before it. And when we finally do understand how to cure/prevent it, there will be something else to take its place, because despite what three-toothed conspiracy-theory dipshits think, there's no big, sinister plot needed to make medicine profitable; the simple fact that the machine of the human body will fail to run perfectly and people will therefore get sick makes it inevitable all by itself.

 

[Ringel05]

That's not entirely true.......

Earliest Human Cancer Found in 1.7-Million-Year-Old Bone

Then again that could have been put out there for false information , for a complex reason with many webs of " why and how come".

" IF " the article you mention was put out for false information, it would be to benefit the medical industry as to the very fact that cancer existed. Why? Because with everything stacked against us in today's world it makes it seem NONE of these issues cause cancer and that cancer existed way back then". That is not to say cancer did not exist whatsoever, buuuuut cancer if it existed back then was way, way, way lower than what it is today.

The suspected cause of cancers today....................

Cell phones / electronics
Cell phone towers and the radio wave legnths
Foods we eat
homes we live in
Clothes we wear
the air we breathe
on and on on.

Okay tell ya what, you move to some remote corner of the world, away from everything and everyone, live a pure life then one day you can lay in your cave wondering why you're dying from nothing.

LMAO I wish I could , but get the point here, the more people who become aware of these issues the more power we have against big CORPORATIONS................ get this they all invest in stocks right, big pharma pays and petitions lets say for " POT" to say ILLEGAL, why because if the pot really helps people as claimed they LOSE MONEY, WHy do you think big beer companies keep pot illegal same thing booze loses money..

If people were to actually stay healthy by eating healthy , the industry loses money...

Why do you think there has been a bandwagon against GMO FOODS, why do you think fake paid of information is being put out about GMO NOT causing cancer because ppl would actually stop buying the shit food causing cancers.

Can you see where i'm going .

I know where you're going with it but unlike you the vast majority of people don't see some vast corporate/government conspiracy, what we see is more complex and less conspiratorial.

Such as biology?

Yeah, quite familiar with that subject, I suspect much more than you are having worked in the medical field for 12 years in my youth, not to mention a year of pre-med before moving to other disciplines. I bet you're not aware just how screwed up medical research is specifically in the nutritional realm.