The Big Lie is Bush Lied

We all know you have no need for facts - you ignore them like most liberal moonbats


I am not afraid of facts, and I would like to debate ideas with you....

look...if that is not something you are interested in, that is fine with me. I'll just put you back on ignore. If you would like to actually engage in debate, I welcome your participation.
 
We all know you have no need for facts - you ignore them like most liberal moonbats


and I think that "WE" all know that you are getting increasingly marginalized from your conservative brethren here... it is pretty much you and glockmail giving each other cyberblowjobs and the rest of the conservatives distancing themselves from you and calling you an embarrassment.
 
and I think that "WE" all know that you are getting increasingly marginalized from your conservative brethren here... it is pretty much you and glockmail giving each other cyberblowjobs and the rest of the conservatives distancing themselves from you and calling you an embarrassment.

So what is new about RINO's or "conservatives" like McCain who are more worried about getting along with libs then the truth?
 
no I'm afraid not you are indeed ignoring these men and patriots
you cant address the opinions of these experts or the lack of media attention to there bold statements ,so you make your delusional lib blah blah
blah comments to avoid it...word



another genius on the left bellows................


Rosie Sees Only Evil in US, Not Iran, Speaks on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Posted by Justin McCarthy on March 29, 2007 - 14:34.
The co-hosts of "The View" again discussed the Iranian British hostage situation on the March 29 edition. Rosie O’Donnell trusted the Iranians more than the British and Americans, and the discussion evolved into more Rosie rants against alleged Bush administration tyranny and for the first time on "The View," Rosie ranted on her September 11 conspiracy theories. Rosie’s rants were too much even for fringe liberal Joy Behar. Token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck was far more assertive than the previous day. In the teaser at the end of the first segment, Rosie and Joy made light of the upcoming discussion.

ROSIE O’DONNELL: Alright we’re going to take a break and come back and talk about the situation in Iran with the soldiers, the British soldiers who were in international waters. The British say they were in the right waters and the Iranians say no they were in our waters, and so it begins.

JOY BEHAR: Do you think people are now clicking us off because you promoed that?

O’DONNELL: Well, I don’t know, but we're going to talk about it and I'm sure it will make the news.


Rosie exclaimed what is certainly news to Iran, that the entire world is siding with Iran as opposed to Britain and the United States.

O’DONNELL: Here’s the problem with what you just said, "us," because it's now Britain and the United States pretty much against the rest of the world. How did this happen?

Rosie, always concerned about the humanity of terrorists, brought that up again.

O’DONNELL: It's just it’s very hard in America when anyone from the mid-east has been so demonized that no matter what, it's impossible for some people to believe that the Iranians in any way could ever do anything ethical in any capacity. They are not people. They have somehow been dehumanized to the point where they’re not people who they’re just the enemy, the terrorists.

With the aide of guest co-host Marcia Gay Harden, Rosie continued on that theme, but that was too much even for her ideological ally, Joy Behar.

MARCIA GAY HARDEN: That digresses from what the real issues are. You worded a war on terror, personally that is propaganda.

O’DONNELL: Exactly, Marcia. Thank you.

HARDEN: I don't like the wording of it.

O’DONNELL: Right, because it makes people into evil and good.

BEHAR: This guy Amanidajaja (sic), whatever his name is. He is a bad guy, he is a very bad guy. He stated explicitly he wants to wipe Israel off the map. This guy is a bad guy.

O’DONNELL: I'm not saying he's a good guy and I want him over for breakfast. No I’m not. I’m saying that in America we are fed propaganda and if you want to know what's happening in the world go outside of the U.S. media because it's owned by four corporations one of them is this one. And you know what, go outside of the country to find out what's going on in our country because it's frightening. It’s frightening.

HASSELBECK: So you think we're being brainwashed as a whole country? I think not. I think it’s a media

O’DONNELL: Democracy is threatened in a way it hasn't been in 200 years and if America doesn't stand up we're in big trouble.

Rosie should do some research on U.S. history. She is apparently unaware of the Alien and Sedition Acts, President Abraham Lincoln suspending Habeas Corpus, the Red Scare immediately after World War I, and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.

Rosie for the first time mentioned her September 11 conspiracy theories on "The View." Note that she has "no idea" who attacked us on that tragic day.

HASSELBECK: Do you believe that the government had anything to do with the attack of 9/11? Do you believe in a conspiracy in terms of the attack of 9/11?

O’DONNELL: No. But I do believe the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics for the World Trade Center Tower Seven, building seven, which collapsed in on itself, it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved, World Trade Center Seven. World Trade Center one and Two got hit by plains. Seven, miraculously, for the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.

HASSELBECK: And who do you think is responsible for that?

O’DONNELL: I have no idea. But to say that we don't know it was imploded, that there was implosion in the demolition, is beyond ignorant. Look at the film. Get a physics expert here from Yale, from Harvard. Pick the school. It defies reason.
http://newsbusters.org/node/11710
 
So what is new about RINO's or "conservatives" like McCain who are more worried about getting along with libs then the truth?


if you wish to denigrate your own fellow conservatives rather than just exhibit a modicum of self criticism and realize that your over-reliance on cut and paste and oneliners is becoming an embarrassment to your cohorts, that is certainly your choice.
 
if you wish to denigrate your own fellow conservatives rather than just exhibit a modicum of self criticism and realize that your over-reliance on cut and paste and oneliners is becoming an embarrassment to your cohorts, that is certainly your choice.

Libs love "conservatives" who do not put up much of a fight and just want to get along
 
Libs love "conservatives" who do not put up much of a fight and just want to get along

no.... I enjoy discussing issues with conservatives with enough intelligence to be able to argue their own cause. There are plenty of them on this site.

Unfortunately, you are not one of them.
 
no.... I enjoy discussing issues with conservatives with enough intelligence to be able to argue their own cause. There are plenty of them on this site.

Unfortunately, you are not one of them.

To you that would be not putting up much of a fight

I rest my case
 
To you that would be not putting up much of a fight

I rest my case

you have no case.... you are a joke.... even your fellow conservatives think you are a joke. If you were capable of actually stringing words together to argue your positions, you would.... instead, you either cut and paste editorials from conservative sources, or you toss out imbecilic one liners that always follow the formula of: "libs are....." or "typical libs" .... or "libs hate the troops....blah blah blah". You are like a broken record...an intellectual lightweight adolescent who has stumbled into a discussion between grownups and you think you can keep up by substituting the words of others for your own inability to formulate thoughts. It might have worked for a while, but folks on both sides of the aisle are catching on.....

how many of your fellow conservatives to you see rushing to your defense in this - or any other - thread?
 
you have no case.... you are a joke.... even your fellow conservatives think you are a joke. If you were capable of actually stringing words together to argue your positions, you would.... instead, you either cut and paste editorials from conservative sources, or you toss out imbecilic one liners that always follow the formula of: "libs are....." or "typical libs" .... or "libs hate the troops....blah blah blah". You are like a broken record...an intellectual lightweight adolescent who has stumbled into a discussion between grownups and you think you can keep up by substituting the words of others for your own inability to formulate thoughts. It might have worked for a while, but folks on both sides of the aisle are catching on.....

how many of your fellow conservatives to you see rushing to your defense in this - or any other - thread?

Your brand of conservatives attack me for posting the get well wishes libs post toward Tony Snow

Then I point out how this is normal - they did the same thing to VP Cheney and Laura Ingraham

This is the type of conservatoves libs like you love and admire
 
Your brand of conservatives attack me for posting the get well wishes libs post toward Tony Snow

Then I point out how this is normal - they did the same thing to VP Cheney and Laura Ingraham

This is the type of conservatoves libs like you love and admire

Like I said.... you really are incapable of discussing any substantive policy issues with your own words. IT is always about "behavior" with you...it is always about how "libs" misbehave, in your opinion. You really are not capable of carrying on a discussion which discusses the merits of foreign policy. It's all about "libs do this...or libs do that" sooooo boring. soooo childish.
 
Like I said.... you really are incapable of discussing any substantive policy issues with your own words. IT is always about "behavior" with you...it is always about how "libs" misbehave, in your opinion. You really are not capable of carrying on a discussion which discusses the merits of foreign policy. It's all about "libs do this...or libs do that" sooooo boring. soooo childish.

I point out the party that claims to be so loving, compassionate, and tolerant are exactly the opposite when you disagree with them - is that a crime?

I plead guilty then
 
I point out the party that claims to be so loving, compassionate, and tolerant are exactly the opposite when you disagree with them - is that a crime?

I plead guilty then

you don't talk policy...you talk gotcha trash about behavior, not about issues.....

boring and predictable
 
you don't talk policy...you talk gotcha trash about behavior, not about issues.....

boring and predictable

I would not say that - libs can be boring and predictable, but they can be disgusting and repulsive when they let their emotions flow out
 
I would not say that - libs can be boring and predictable, but they can be disgusting and repulsive when they let their emotions flow out

I really have no desire to debate "emotions" with you RSR...if you would like to use your own brain to formulate your own thoughts about American foreign policy in Iraq, or any other policy issue of any substance, I would love to read those thoughts....if all you can come up with is "libs are disgusting and repulsive" "libs hate the troops" "libs hate the rich" sprinkled in your constant diatribe of cut and paste editorials, I really have no desire to waste my time. whaddaya say?
 
I really have no desire to debate "emotions" with you RSR...if you would like to use your own brain to formulate your own thoughts about American foreign policy in Iraq, or any other policy issue of any substance, I would love to read those thoughts....if all you can come up with is "libs are disgusting and repulsive" "libs hate the troops" "libs hate the rich" sprinkled in your constant diatribe of cut and paste editorials, I really have no desire to waste my time. whaddaya say?

Liberalism is based on emotion. If you are a lib, you let your emotions decide your beliefs.

Today libs are running on hate and rage. Their political future depends on the US losing in Iraq, the economy plunging downward, and painting a picture of doom and gloom for the people
 
Liberalism is based on emotion. If you are a lib, you let your emotions decide your beliefs.

Today libs are running on hate and rage. Their political future depends on the US losing in Iraq, the economy plunging downward, and painting a picture of doom and gloom for the people


that is oversimplification to the point of idiocy. Do you want to talk about policies and current events, or do you want to continue your emotional non-specific diatribe against all things liberal? It's up to you.
 
Liberalism is based on emotion. If you are a lib, you let your emotions decide your beliefs.

Today libs are running on hate and rage. Their political future depends on the US losing in Iraq, the economy plunging downward, and painting a picture of doom and gloom for the people

Last I heard it was RELIGEOUS CONSERVATIVES who flew planes into buildings......NOT LIBERALS. Looks like it's you cons who are running on HATE AND RAGE.
 
Last I heard it was RELIGEOUS CONSERVATIVES who flew planes into buildings......NOT LIBERALS. Looks like it's you cons who are running on HATE AND RAGE.

That would be religious conservatives. Which religion? It's the liberals that are providing the apologies for the conservatives of that religion.
 
I would not say that - libs can be boring and predictable, but they can be disgusting and repulsive when they let their emotions flow out

What the fuck is that?

Conservatives can be boring and predictable (you're one, yes?).
Conservatives can be disgusting and repulsive when they let their emotions flow out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top