So, I notice there are a ton of Benghazi threads & 9/11 threads here in the 'Politics' forum. Another thing I have noticed over the years is G. W. Bush has gotten a 'free pass' on 9/11. Conversely Obama & HRC get crucified over the Benghazi attack. Let's do just a minor comparison. 9/11 attacks happened on US soil, 3,000 people died, the result was two wars, both wars are still ongoing, with the financial costs are into the trillion$ & the human costs are nearly 1 million lives. Benghazi attacks happened in Libya, four US dead, four US wounded, and the financial costs & the costs in lives will never approach anything compared to 9/11. So, here is what I DON'T GET. With the effects of 9/11 so enormous, so epic, and honestly there is no comparison in modern history, WHY does G. W. Bush continue to get that 'free pass' for 9/11, all while there is a 'cottage industry' of people that zealously blame Obama & HRC for the Benghazi attacks? It is a very strange thing; I certainly do not understand why people's priorities are seeming misplaced when 9/11 is such the 'Earth shattering' event compared to the Benghazi attack, which seems almost like a sneeze, when compared to 9/11. What am I missing?