Thanks Obama! You May Have Saved Us

[CrusaderFrank]

So, we're agreed Trump can use the NSA against his domestic enemies, right?

 

[Moonglow]

 

[Kilroy2]

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

 

[Kilroy2]

So, we're agreed Trump can use the NSA against his domestic enemies, right?

No being a domestic enemy because they critisize him is not a crime

that is an authoritarian regime view but I would not put it pass ET because we know how much he loves Putin and the SA king because they are such authoritarians. Rulers for life

If they commit a crime that can be proven then they need to be exposed as breaking the law not domestic enemies of trump

So if trump broke the law he should be brought to justice

despite his popularity with the right

would you not agree

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, we're agreed Trump can use the NSA against his domestic enemies, right?

No being a domestic enemy because they critisize him is not a crime

that is an authoritarian regime view but I would not put it pass ET because we know how much he loves Putin and the SA king because they are such authoritarians. Rulers for life

If they commit a crime that can be proven then they need to be exposed as breaking the law not domestic enemies of trump

So if trump broke the law he should be brought to justice

despite his popularity with the right

would you not agree

Wait a second. We're going to use RNC gathered information to get a FISA warrant to check up on the democrats. If they're not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about. You sound worried

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

We're going to use the Sean Hannity memo

 

[bripat9643]

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

Nothing in the Steele dossier has been proven, douchebag.

 

[Kilroy2]

So, we're agreed Trump can use the NSA against his domestic enemies, right?

No being a domestic enemy because they critisize him is not a crime

that is an authoritarian regime view but I would not put it pass ET because we know how much he loves Putin and the SA king because they are such authoritarians. Rulers for life

If they commit a crime that can be proven then they need to be exposed as breaking the law not domestic enemies of trump

So if trump broke the law he should be brought to justice

despite his popularity with the right

would you not agree

Wait a second. We're going to use RNC gathered information to get a FISA warrant to check up on the democrats. If they're not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about. You sound worried

they can gather all the info that they want but if they can't prove anything with the info that they give to the FBI then spin your wheels

Gathering information is just allegations

It is up to law inforcement to determine that a crime was committed and they will bring charges that will have to be settle in court.

If repubs want to know how it is done then look at the Steel dossier

What was allegation was proven by a legetimate law enforcement agency with guilty pleas and convictions

If they are not doing anything wrong then I am not worried

Hillary faced allegations that turned out to be false and she was not even charged

I sorry if ET is facing allegations and if he is charged

Sorry

 

[Kilroy2]

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

We're going to use the Sean Hannity memo

well then use it and maybe the FBI will get a good laugh

I know I will

I know when Sean invited Cohen over for legal advice it was probably about this alleged memo

 

[Kilroy2]

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof

linking that statement to the dossier is incorrect as there are points in the dossier that were proven to be true and there were some points in the dossier that cannot be proven.

Dossier does not have to be true as it is just unsubstantiated allegations much like any initial report of a crime to law authorities

It is up to the investigating agency to find the evidence which supports the allegations thus making the case for prosecution

the indictment of 12 officers of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) came from information in the Steel dossier and were found to be true which resulted in the indictment .

The dossier also reported the plan to hack and the hacking attempts of the DNC and democratic party which was found to be true

Thus the clinton emails were released and with Trump statement that he hopes Russian finds these emails and hours later they are released. The case for collusion is being made with involvement of Roger Stone, Corsi, and others.

The Moscow project was in the dossier and when Trump lied about it it was proven that it was a lie

Even Cohen involvment and carter page involvements were in the the dossier.

The dossier was a road map for Mueller and he was able to prove and get admissions of guilt that made his case.

It is like she said the thing that matters is if its true

If it was false then it cannot be proven and will be dropped by the investigation

That why repubs couldn't touch Hillary because none of the allegation could be proven to rise to the level of being a crime that should be charged against her

Even the IG review agreed that Hillary should not be charged yet they blasted comey.

So in the case of Hillary "Negative evidence is evidence that can't be proved and as such not positive proof" but it doesn't stop repubs

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

Nothing in the Steele dossier has been proven, douchebag.

have you looked in the mirror lately

 

[Avatar4321]

The title of this thread is something no intelligent person would ever say

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Utter horseshit. None of that came from the dossier. You have no idea where it came from. You're making stuff up, but that's what you snowflake morons do.

Its almost like looking in the mirror you claim it to be false but you offer no proof yet everything that I wrote is available if you want to know the truth
but I would suspect that you don't.

Mueller has gotten confession of guilt, two trials that ended in guilt and indictments and is about to close down the big cheese himself.

So Sleep tight don't let the bed bugs bite

You still have Pence

If it's available on the internet, then post the parts that prove your claim. You don't do that because you know it's horseshit. That's how this logic thing works. You make a claim, and then you post the evidence to support it. With snowflakes it always ends at the making a claim part.

None of the so-called Mueller "confessions" and "trials" have anything to do with collusion. They're a side show in Mueller's circus to make it look like he's doing something. All he's really doing is persecuting people who were harming no one. Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. Of that there is no doubt.

Be careful of what you ask for cupcake

Read the Carter Page surveillance warrant documents - CNNPolitics

Former Trump campaign adviser pleads guilty to lying to FBI about Russia contacts

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115596/download

Steel Dossier take it slowly as some allegation have not been proven while others have but it is still fun reading

Trump Intelligence Allegations

We're going to use the Sean Hannity memo

well then use it and maybe the FBI will get a good laugh

I know I will

I know when Sean invited Cohen over for legal advice it was probably about this alleged memo

All we need is the FISA warrant, then the NSA can listen to never democrat 24/7.
Thanks, Obama!

 

[Dana7360]

When mueller is about to spring his trap Trump will start unsealing his 57000 indictments and the left will start crapping their pants and stop mueller in his tracks. Mueller himself will be running for cover.

I guess you don't understand how our justice system works.

Indictments usually come from a grand jury. They are convened for a minimum of 18 months but can be extended beyond that. The state presents witnesses to gather evidence from them and the grand jury usually indicts people.

A president can't indict anyone.

If you think that a president can do that you really aren't in full control of your mental faculties.

If you think that there's been a grand jury convened on anyone from the "left" in connection to any of this you're really delusional.

Who has been feeding you these lies and propaganda?

 

[deanrd]

 

[Asclepias]

Thats great.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The 57 States Not so Shovel Ready President talking about qualifications -- all over the world Irony Meters are crying for relief

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump should have the NSA monitor Muellers entire team, that is, if he hasn't already done so.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump should have the NSA monitor Muellers entire team, that is, if he hasn't already done so.

He can try, and they will just refuse him and publicly embarrass him,just like his DOJ, the congress, his military, his intelligence community, etc.

So yes, please, let the big orange pussy make that request. I hope he does.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump should have the NSA monitor Muellers entire team, that is, if he hasn't already done so.

He can try, and they will just refuse him and publicly embarrass him,just like his DOJ, the congress, his military, his intelligence community, etc.

So yes, please, let the big orange pussy make that request. I hope he does.

Does Trump even have to make a request under the Obama Doctrine? Mueller is talking to the Russian, what are they discussing?

 

[Synthaholic]

Mueller will supply proof if it exists.

.....chanted just like the mindless incantation it has become. Naturally.

You mean like ‘lock her up’ and ‘build the wall’? Those kinds of mindless incantations?

I’m gonna have fun with you, little wingnut. You suck at this.

Sweetheart, I quit the Left before you were even born.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

I understand how you think.

You do not understand how we think.

Obviously.

You don't think.

Obviously.