Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All you proved is that Obama was directing and facilitating the coup. Obama will end up wearing an Orange jump suit.Twitter thread from the anonymous, but highly regarded The Hoarse Whisperer. It starts getting good around the 15th tweet.
The Hoarse Whisperer on Twitter
But here’s the Obama part.
View attachment 239816
View attachment 239815
It’s illegal to coordinate with a foreign government on a campaign, or to take anything of value. To do so with an enemy is treason.So...why is the MSM going into a tailspin if it WAS NOT illegal...other than they HATE TRUMP???It's not, and nobody said there was anything wrong with it. Every campaign does it, and quite legally so. You are going to into a tailspin, now.So...if Trump PAID for private analytics of voter data...how is THAT any different than Hillary PAYING for a dossier????
Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.Most of it has been proven true, while none of it has been proven false.You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.
Even a hack like you should be able to understand that.
Another moron with failed 2014 talking points.Manafort showed data to prove he had a winning horse (to Ukraine?). So what?
Forgot, only the Clinton Crime Foundation can solicit donations. Obama handed out $150B in secret to terrorists. No vote on it.
Hmm, no, that's not what the thought is. The thought is that he shared this data with the Russian spy to get it to his Russian-friendly contacts in order that Russian trolls could more effectively target their efforts.Manafort showed data to prove he had a winning horse (to Ukraine?). So what?
None of it has been proven true, you fucking dumbass. How many times are you imbeciles going to repeat this lie? You all repeat the same lies over and over and over. It's impossible for facts to penetrate your thick skulls. When I was younger I would never have believed that anyone could be this stupid. When I see this kind of idiocy I realize this country is doomed.Most of it has been proven true, while none of it has been proven false.You can't claim positive proof with negative evidence...Even a room-temperature IQ hack like you should be able to understand that.#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.
Even a hack like you should be able to understand that.
If Hill & co. paid for a FAKE dossier...and initiated an "investigation" that has thus far cost tax payers $$$MILLIONS$$$...then SOMEONE indeed is guilty of a crime...and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law...Tell me why it matters who paid if it’s true.I beg to differ...#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.So...if Trump PAID for private analytics of voter data...how is THAT any different than Hillary PAYING for a dossier????What a stupid thing to say. For one, campaigns pay for private analytics of voter data, so this is likely the information that was shared. And it is absurd to imply that a Russian spy would go to the trump campaign chief for information he could find with the click of a mouse. Really, truly peak Trump cultism, on display by you.Most likely the same "polling data" that was available to ANYONE on the world wide web...
I'll give you a few moments....to "re-group"...
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.
Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier
OK...ok...the DNC helped a little, too...
That's the thought of idiots like you.Hmm, no, that's not what the thought is. The thought is that he shared this data with the Russian spy to get it to his Russian-friendly contacts in order that Russian trolls could more effectively target their efforts.Manafort showed data to prove he had a winning horse (to Ukraine?). So what?
Haha...sure.Me thinks that Hill, Mueller, Comey etc are VERY worried
First of all, there was and is no evidence of collusion, so Obama assumed trump was guilty on the basis of nothing. His move was only made to make sensitive intelligence that thousands should never see available to deep state operatives throughout the govt to be leaked or passed on to others. Every intelligence person said this was unprecedented and unheard of. Obama knew if not directed all the shenanigans of the fbi. He subverted the whole govt by opening all the doors to a soft coup. I guess you forgot about the directive from Susan rice on Inauguration Day that Obama wasn’t guilty of anything. I have stated before, Obama is the most corrupt president of my lifetime, the fact he had a justice dept. that buried all his crimes does not make him less guilty.How does it do that? Use your words.Another move by Obama to subvert our elections and our country, just as we have always known.
It's always so easy to show what a fool you are, Oddball. Don’t go changin’.Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.
But they didn’t, and the dossier is true.If Hill & co. paid for a FAKE dossier...and initiated an "investigation" that has thus far cost tax payers $$$MILLIONS$$$...then SOMEONE indeed is guilty of a crime...and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law...Tell me why it matters who paid if it’s true.I beg to differ...#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.So...if Trump PAID for private analytics of voter data...how is THAT any different than Hillary PAYING for a dossier????What a stupid thing to say. For one, campaigns pay for private analytics of voter data, so this is likely the information that was shared. And it is absurd to imply that a Russian spy would go to the trump campaign chief for information he could find with the click of a mouse. Really, truly peak Trump cultism, on display by you.
I'll give you a few moments....to "re-group"...
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.
Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier
OK...ok...the DNC helped a little, too...
Me thinks that Hill, Mueller, Comey etc are VERY worried...
First of all, you just made that up, could not possibly know the truth of it, and have no good reason to think it.. Second of all, you just made that up,could not possibly know the truth of it, and have no good reason to think it.First of all, there was and is no evidence of collusion
Who says they should never see that intel? I doubt it’s thousands, and who sees it should be left to the top agents in the FBI and CIA. That’s why they’re in charge.First of all, there was and is no evidence of collusion, so Obama assumed trump was guilty on the basis of nothing. His move was only made to make sensitive intelligence that thousands should never see available to deep state operatives throughout the got to be leaked or passed on to others. Every intelligence person said this was unprecedented and unheard of. Obama knew if not directed all the shenanigans of the fbi. He subverted the whole govt by opening all the doors to a soft coup. I guess you forgot about the directive from Susan rice on Inauguration Day that Obama wasn’t guilty of anything. I have stated before, Obama is the most corrupt president of my lifetime, the fact he had a justice dept. that buried all his crimes does not make him less guilty.How does it do that? Use your words.Another move by Obama to subvert our elections and our country, just as we have always known.
Slate and Newsweak?!? LMAO!!!!!It's always so easy to show what a fool you are, Oddball. Don’t go changin’.Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.
A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated
Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier
None of the Steele report has been corroborated, you fucking dumbass.It's always so easy to show what a fool you are, Oddball. Don’t go changin’.Next to none one of it has been shown to be true....Stupidity on your level should be physically painful...A tragedy it isn't.
A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated
Here's what's true in the infamous Trump-Russia dossier
That just shows that it was HILLARY that colluded with the Ruskies...But they didn’t, and the dossier is true.If Hill & co. paid for a FAKE dossier...and initiated an "investigation" that has thus far cost tax payers $$$MILLIONS$$$...then SOMEONE indeed is guilty of a crime...and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law...Tell me why it matters who paid if it’s true.I beg to differ...#1 - Hillary didn’t pay for the dossier.So...if Trump PAID for private analytics of voter data...how is THAT any different than Hillary PAYING for a dossier????
I'll give you a few moments....to "re-group"...
#2 - What if she did? The only thing that matters is if it is true. And none of it has been proven false.
Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier
OK...ok...the DNC helped a little, too...
Me thinks that Hill, Mueller, Comey etc are VERY worried...
Yeah, why doesn't he cite one of your awesome sources, like Breitbart and zero-hedge?Slate and Newsweak?!?
They are far more credible than Slate or Newsweek.Yeah, why doesn't he cite one of your awesome sources, like Breitbart and zero-hedge?Slate and Newsweak?!?
