Terrorist ???

No, Zionist, if you really want a rational discussion on terrorism, let's start with the King David Hotel


I do hope you reread and realize how infinitely ignorant that this post is. What about the Hebron massacre?

Or let's expand on your rehash of the Kind David Hotel. Tell me exactly how many Arabs and/or Palestinians were in the King David Hotel? That is the weakest thing to bring up and shows how much you are just a sock and lap up the crap with your blinders on.
 
When Palestine was separated from Turkey they had the right to self determination without external interference, the right to independence and sovereignty, and the right to territorial integrity.

Please tell me more about this. AFAIK, 'Palestine' was separated from the Ottoman Empire (now known as Turkey) at the end of WWI; and the creation of the Mandate for Palestine, etc., etc., etc.
 
Apart from arguing that Palestinians stood up for their rights from the start, but were murdered each time by the very-effective-at-killing invading Europeans.

If the Palestinians had ever gotten their collective shit together without being puppets and pawns, we wouldn't have what we've had for the last 60+ years!!!
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

Annoying for the Zionists, genocide went out of fashion, just as they invaded, so the 'American solution' is - openly at least - off the table. That's why they have to try to do it by stealth.

Short of that, Palestinians will prevail.
I agree, they could be more effective more quickly. Hampered by Israel assassinating many with leadership potential, traumatising them while they are still children, with brutal prisons and torture, and hampering their education.

But still, Palestinians will prevail.
You are on the wrong side of history Teddy.
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

I'm glad you brought up that analogy, as I have as well.

So what do you suppose would happen if the Native Americans decided to start lobbing rockets and mortars from inside the 'rez' to outside?
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

Annoying for the Zionists, genocide went out of fashion, just as they invaded, so the 'American solution' is - openly at least - off the table. That's why they have to try to do it by stealth.

Short of that, Palestinians will prevail.
I agree, they could be more effective more quickly. Hampered by Israel assassinating many with leadership potential, traumatising them while they are still children, with brutal prisons and torture, and hampering their education.

But still, Palestinians will prevail.
You are on the wrong side of history Teddy.

Interesting kind of genocide happening here Beezle. Did you know that the Pal
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

Annoying for the Zionists, genocide went out of fashion, just as they invaded, so the 'American solution' is - openly at least - off the table. That's why they have to try to do it by stealth.

Short of that, Palestinians will prevail.
I agree, they could be more effective more quickly. Hampered by Israel assassinating many with leadership potential, traumatising them while they are still children, with brutal prisons and torture, and hampering their education.

But still, Palestinians will prevail.
You are on the wrong side of history Teddy.
"The Palestinians will prevail"

*yawn*
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

I'm glad you brought up that analogy, as I have as well.

So what do you suppose would happen if the Native Americans decided to start lobbing rockets and mortars from inside the 'rez' to outside?


You'd kill them.

What's your point?
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

I'm glad you brought up that analogy, as I have as well.

So what do you suppose would happen if the Native Americans decided to start lobbing rockets and mortars from inside the 'rez' to outside?


You'd kill them.

What's your point?
Maybe the Palestinians should stop and build casinos instead. Seems to be working well for the Indians here . . .
 
Yep.

Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas.

I'm glad you brought up that analogy, as I have as well.

So what do you suppose would happen if the Native Americans decided to start lobbing rockets and mortars from inside the 'rez' to outside?


You'd kill them.

What's your point?
Maybe the Palestinians should stop and build casinos instead. Seems to be working well for the Indians here . . .


That would be a bit of a gamble.

If you want to have a parallel between Indians on reservations, and Palestinians, you have to tweak the circumstances a bit.

First: Bring the US genocide against them away from the 1700's and 1800's into the modern period. Difference is that there was no situation with international laws against aggression or even the word 'genocide' let alone a prohibition on it.

Then:
Have all the powers agreeing that the reason for establishing a new state is because the world is very sorry and very contrite about doing genocide. That it must NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.

Same in the US and in Palestine anyway - have the European invaders commit genocide through a series of actions, justified by pretexts, the indigenous not accepting imposed conditions which were designed to destroy them by marginalisation or through war when they objected. (The parallel works perfectly here).

In both societies, have massive racism against the 'indians'. On work, where they can live, dispensation of law (let's not call it 'justice').

Have a pow wow. Outline what is a bitter defeat of the indians, leaving them 30% of the nation, while taking 70% as the end goal of the talks. From the start, encroach on that notional remaining land with new & expanding settlements.

When nations allied to the Indians (Mexico / Canada?) try to even things up, use that as an excuse to occupy ALL indian territory. Only to be thrown out of one area, in an uprising.

Cut and slice and colonise the land that you occupy directly. Put that which you don't at siege. Stop their trade. Assassinate their leaders. Shoot their children at will with no legal redress.

When the area at siege shoots back with ineffective home made weapons, act all surprised.
 
Last edited:
Finmore: "So Israel claims borders on land that Israel agreed is Palestine? Interesting. Even the UN has disclaimers on the validity of those borders."

you're always sticking up for corrupted entities..............I notice.

- terrorists




- people with a nazi mentality and/or holocaust denying idiots



- the UN people..............




that little girl --it IS a girl, right ? (who's alot older now) - what's it gonna be for her:

- LIGHT

- HARD




- HARDER





- you know....
 
BEEZY: "Not dissimilar to the US, whereby, had the native indians got their shit together, they would still be the dominant culture in the Americas."

yeah, the dominant culture in JAIL.................had the indians HAD the run of "the land" - we would be just an extension of that lawless craphole --- mexico. Anything (a large swathe of land) in the hands of 'darker-skinned' people (like the "INDIANS") - ALWAYS ...........there goes the neighborhood.
 

Forum List

Back
Top