Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sorry Huggy, it was started by President Johnson, in order the fund Vietnam.
Both parties have spent the SSI surplus ever since and left IOU's.
Wanting to get SSI out of the hands of congress is the goal that is trying to made.
Privatizing SSI has worked out very well for Chile.
Privatizing SS is stupid and dangerous. You cannot use the fact that it's trust fund has been abused to achieve that takeover. The only thing that is necessary to fix the problem is to make the trust fund off limits to federal borrowing. There needs to be a bill passed to fully refund SS to the level of it's contributions and then forever HANDS OFF!!
Better but doesnt acheive the funds needed for it to be sustained.
Privatizing SS is stupid and dangerous. You cannot use the fact that it's trust fund has been abused to achieve that takeover. The only thing that is necessary to fix the problem is to make the trust fund off limits to federal borrowing. There needs to be a bill passed to fully refund SS to the level of it's contributions and then forever HANDS OFF!!
Better but doesnt acheive the funds needed for it to be sustained.
Yes, it does, as long as those funds are used for nothing else. Add more means-testing and increased age eligibility, and it will run a surplus. Both Pubs and Dems have to stop using it for other government expenditures.
Better but doesnt acheive the funds needed for it to be sustained.
Yes, it does, as long as those funds are used for nothing else. Add more means-testing and increased age eligibility, and it will run a surplus. Both Pubs and Dems have to stop using it for other government expenditures.
No it does not. Current expiration is 2037 proving your premise false. Not to mention thats collecting interest from ourselves. How are you going to get the added interest?
Sorry Huggy, it was started by President Johnson, in order the fund Vietnam.
Both parties have spent the SSI surplus ever since and left IOU's.
Wanting to get SSI out of the hands of congress is the goal that is trying to made.
Privatizing SSI has worked out very well for Chile.
Privatizing SS is stupid and dangerous. You cannot use the fact that it's trust fund has been abused to achieve that takeover. The only thing that is necessary to fix the problem is to make the trust fund off limits to federal borrowing. There needs to be a bill passed to fully refund SS to the level of it's contributions and then forever HANDS OFF!!
Sorry Huggy, it was started by President Johnson, in order the fund Vietnam.
Both parties have spent the SSI surplus ever since and left IOU's.
Wanting to get SSI out of the hands of congress is the goal that is trying to made.
Privatizing SSI has worked out very well for Chile.
Privatizing SS is stupid and dangerous. You cannot use the fact that it's trust fund has been abused to achieve that takeover. The only thing that is necessary to fix the problem is to make the trust fund off limits to federal borrowing. There needs to be a bill passed to fully refund SS to the level of it's contributions and then forever HANDS OFF!!
Better but doesn't achieve the funds needed for it to be sustained.
Yes, it does, as long as those funds are used for nothing else. Add more means-testing and increased age eligibility, and it will run a surplus. Both Pubs and Dems have to stop using it for other government expenditures.
No it does not. Current expiration is 2037 proving your premise false. Not to mention thats collecting interest from ourselves. How are you going to get the added interest?
Your extrapolation of figures is false, but you can go ahead and post how you got them, for laughs.
Privatizing SS is stupid and dangerous. You cannot use the fact that it's trust fund has been abused to achieve that takeover. The only thing that is necessary to fix the problem is to make the trust fund off limits to federal borrowing. There needs to be a bill passed to fully refund SS to the level of it's contributions and then forever HANDS OFF!!
Better but doesn't achieve the funds needed for it to be sustained.
It is fully funded well into the future. There is an obvious "bubble" as the boomers mature to the retirement age but a slight adjustment of the upper cap on contributions could easily solve that. Yes..I said it...raise the cutoff level for SS contributions. OMG!!!
There is another thing about the Pee Down Your Leg Party that I find disgusting. Sometimes a company or a country has to step up and buy their way out of a problem and make unusual contributions to achieve that purpose. We did it after WWII and the rich paid 90% to expedite our recovery from the war debt and to build the interstate highway system. What people like you do not possess is the wisdom and courage to step up to the plate when it is clearly called for. You chicken shit pissants prefer to steal from the aged ...the disabled and just about anyone that is at your mercy.
You really are vile pieces of crap.
First off you are wrong. The tea party represent the views of a good portion of American citizens. Second, we do not need a bigger Gov't. and higher taxes, liberal socialists think that way.
No it does not. Current expiration is 2037 proving your premise false. Not to mention thats collecting interest from ourselves. How are you going to get the added interest?
Your extrapolation of figures is false, but you can go ahead and post how you got them, for laughs.
But you cant prove otherwise. Then you also disagree with the trustees report.
See what I mean about laughing at you?
Better but doesn't achieve the funds needed for it to be sustained.
It is fully funded well into the future. There is an obvious "bubble" as the boomers mature to the retirement age but a slight adjustment of the upper cap on contributions could easily solve that. Yes..I said it...raise the cutoff level for SS contributions. OMG!!!
There is another thing about the Pee Down Your Leg Party that I find disgusting. Sometimes a company or a country has to step up and buy their way out of a problem and make unusual contributions to achieve that purpose. We did it after WWII and the rich paid 90% to expedite our recovery from the war debt and to build the interstate highway system. What people like you do not possess is the wisdom and courage to step up to the plate when it is clearly called for. You chicken shit pissants prefer to steal from the aged ...the disabled and just about anyone that is at your mercy.
You really are vile pieces of crap.
LOL Still pissed. Thats good.
So now we move forward with a tax increase. That helps but still isnt enough.
I asked you to post up. Why are you such a wuss?
Your extrapolation of figures is false, but you can go ahead and post how you got them, for laughs.
But you cant prove otherwise. Then you also disagree with the trustees report.
See what I mean about laughing at you?
Those who understand logic are laughing at you. You have posted an assertion, have given no evidence, then demand others to refute you.
Your behavior is laughable.
LOL So you do disagree with the trustees report. Comical. then you cant explain how interest will be added lowering the 2037 date. How can anyone take your seriously. No worries though, heres your chance to post how I am wrong. Should I wait long? Please try to avoid sidestepping the issue.But you cant prove otherwise. Then you also disagree with the trustees report.
See what I mean about laughing at you?
Those who understand logic are laughing at you. You have posted an assertion, have given no evidence, then demand others to refute you.
Your behavior is laughable.
It is fully funded well into the future. There is an obvious "bubble" as the boomers mature to the retirement age but a slight adjustment of the upper cap on contributions could easily solve that. Yes..I said it...raise the cutoff level for SS contributions. OMG!!!
There is another thing about the Pee Down Your Leg Party that I find disgusting. Sometimes a company or a country has to step up and buy their way out of a problem and make unusual contributions to achieve that purpose. We did it after WWII and the rich paid 90% to expedite our recovery from the war debt and to build the interstate highway system. What people like you do not possess is the wisdom and courage to step up to the plate when it is clearly called for. You chicken shit pissants prefer to steal from the aged ...the disabled and just about anyone that is at your mercy.
You really are vile pieces of crap.
LOL Still pissed. Thats good.
So now we move forward with a tax increase. That helps but still isnt enough.
I asked you to post up. Why are you such a wuss?
Perhaps it is because I am already well educated on the facts and don't need to offer any more than I have time to contribute to your misguided conversation.
Unlike you I am grounded in reality...not fantasy. I don't waste a minute on Fox lies. I get my information from reliable sources like C-SPAN and a variety of public and other media discussion shows like the McGloughlin report.
Weak and timid people disgust me unless they are in that condition through no fault of their own. Selfishness and being cheap is a weakness. I believe we as Americans are better than that...you apparently do not.
Fool-Auto is the one who is deliberately lying. Reactionaries to the far right have to lie to try to sound as if they know what is going on.
LOL Still pissed. Thats good.
So now we move forward with a tax increase. That helps but still isnt enough.
I asked you to post up. Why are you such a wuss?
Perhaps it is because I am already well educated on the facts and don't need to offer any more than I have time to contribute to your misguided conversation.
Unlike you I am grounded in reality...not fantasy. I don't waste a minute on Fox lies. I get my information from reliable sources like C-SPAN and a variety of public and other media discussion shows like the McGloughlin report.
Weak and timid people disgust me unless they are in that condition through no fault of their own. Selfishness and being cheap is a weakness. I believe we as Americans are better than that...you apparently do not.
I am finding you have some facts but intentionally lied in your opening post.
You said so just doesnt do it for me.
Fool-Auto is the one who is deliberately lying. Reactionaries to the far right have to lie to try to sound as if they know what is going on.
SNIP
Perhaps it is because I am already well educated on the facts and don't need to offer any more than I have time to contribute to your misguided conversation.
Unlike you I am grounded in reality...not fantasy. I don't waste a minute on Fox lies. I get my information from reliable sources like C-SPAN and a variety of public and other media discussion shows like the McGloughlin report.
Weak and timid people disgust me unless they are in that condition through no fault of their own. Selfishness and being cheap is a weakness. I believe we as Americans are better than that...you apparently do not.
I am finding you have some facts but intentionally lied in your opening post.
You said so just doesnt do it for me.
I don't make any claim to be "THE" authority on everything. I am better informed than most. What draws most of my criticism is weak character..of that I need not apologize. By weak character I do not mean a false belief that I am better than anyone past an inherent and justified defense of my Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness. For one thing I believe that one's belief in a god is a weakness...it is an admission that one does not possess the ability to lead ones own life and know the difference between right and wrong.
I would rather have the company of a drunk or a pot smoker that is honest about who they are than some pompus asshole that needs a bible to decide if something is right or wrong or even true.
Discussing anything with people that are already flawed by their belief system is tiresome.
