Tea Party Ted Cruz Wins in Texas

...and some people....libs and rep establishment....want to tell us the Tea Party is dead.........:eusa_whistle:


Make no mistake, this is a revolution. Dewhurst has ruled Texas for nearly a decade.

1343828069183.cached.jpg


Paul Begala: Ted Cruz and Texas

"The false narrative continues to be written that the tea party is dead, and 2012 will not be like 2010. However, every month we see a strong example to the contrary," said Tea Party Express Chairman Amy Kremer. "Tonight we sent a message that should shake Obama's Chicago headquarters: Texas not only is going to be staying a red state, but the tea party is alive and ready to own 2012."

Tea party wins big in Texas; incumbents pushed out

It's importance is overstated but hardly dead.

i don't think the Tea Party importance is an "overstatement".....

...like for example today you're seeing just a few of them buying chicken sandwiches......:cool:
 
Last edited:
After 2010, after the crushing defeat in Wisconsin, the victory in Texas, and the grass roots protest against anti Christian bias, the democrats might have a tiny clue. But, sadly, no.
 
Big time, the teabaggers have been a gift to the freedom lovers on the left.

First it was angle and odonnell taking sure loses for the democrats (including harry reid) to making it smooth sailing for the (D) win

Same now in IN with the right wing extremists voting in a teabagger in the senate primaies unseating Lugar's locked (R) seat, and now turning it to likely dem.

Thanks teabaggers! :clap2:

Yeah.....I heard about that organization "freedom lovers on the left."


They hold their annual meetings in a unisex bathroom cubicle, don't they?

No, you're thinking the teabagger meetings where they all have "wide stances" and engage in homosexual activities in the men's room.

The freedom loves on the left have an american flag in their front yard, support their country, read labels to proudly by that "made in the USA" item. Go to Mr and Mrs Johnson's corner store instead of the faceless mega store, and most importantly show up to vote (D) on election day :up:

"No, you're thinking the teabagger meetings where they all have "wide stances" and engage in homosexual activities in the men's room. "

Wait....are you insinuating that being gay as some sort of pejorative???

But...but....aren't you guys big supporters of our gay brethren???


You might be interested in this, on that topic, Coulter writes:


1. The media love describing the Republican Party base as “anti-gay”- as opposed to “anti-gay marriage.” Let’s see who’s anti-gay…

a. Gays are the victims of hate crimes, or as Republicans call them, “crimes.” But in the gay enclave of West Hollywood, law and order prevail…cops are everywhere…the average “Parking Restrictions” sign is longer than ‘Gone With the Wind.’

b. Gays have high incomes- a study a few years ago says 60 percent higher than the median income in America.

c. In Islamic countries, gays are punished with death.

Consequently, the three most important issues for any sane gay person ought to be crime, taxes, and the war on Islamic fascists…Manifestly, Republican policies are more pro-gay than Democrat policies and we don’t make a sport of outing political opponents who happen to be gay.

The Democratic Party supports criminals and Islamic terrorists but has no sympathy for taxpayers…


2. Democrats love using the tax code to enact lots of special-interest goodies with great appeal to suburban soccer moms but of absolutely no use to most gays, such as:

a. Child tax credits
b. Tuition tax credits
c. Child-care credits
d. Education savings accounts
e. Student loans
f. The Family and Medical Leave Act
g. There is only one issue more important to Democrats than raising taxes, and that is keeping abortion legal at all stages of pregnancy. This is probably not a big issue for most gays.

"No, you're thinking the teabagger meetings where they all have "wide stances" and engage in homosexual activities in the men's room. "


So...it turns out you guys on the Left really do hate gays, huh?

Well...who'd a guessed it...


...bigot.
 
After 2010, after the crushing defeat in Wisconsin, the victory in Texas, and the grass roots protest against anti Christian bias, the democrats might have a tiny clue. But, sadly, no.

The Tea Party preserved the Democratic majority in the Senate.

Keep up the good work guys!
 
No, you're thinking the teabagger meetings where they all have "wide stances" and engage in homosexual activities in the men's room.

The freedom loves on the left have an american flag in their front yard, support their country, read labels to proudly by that "made in the USA" item. Go to Mr and Mrs Johnson's corner store instead of the faceless mega store, and most importantly show up to vote (D) on election day :up:

Only a fascist pig would vote for most D's these days.

Fascism is what the GOP shitheads are trying to force on america and raping lady liberty with, though you don't have a clue what any of those "scary" sounding words mean.

Only an america hating piece of shit that deserves to be booted out of the country would ever even think of voting (R)



"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred. A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLDmag.com | Admit who we are | Marvin Olasky | Jul 17, 10

Don't you agree?
 
Only a fascist pig would vote for most D's these days.

Fascism is what the GOP shitheads are trying to force on america and raping lady liberty with, though you don't have a clue what any of those "scary" sounding words mean.

Only an america hating piece of shit that deserves to be booted out of the country would ever even think of voting (R)



"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred. A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLDmag.com | Admit who we are | Marvin Olasky | Jul 17, 10

Don't you agree?

Very interesting way to put that. I will have to say yes, the way we have been looking at it is distorted. Thanks for sharing that refreshing idea. Well done young lady.:clap2:
 
"Out of Sink?" LOL...

I hope so. The more divided the GOP becomes, the better it is for the modreates/liberals left in the GOP and otherwise. The Country is a center-right country in some parts and center-left in others. As the GOP splits, it's power (or more correctly perceived power) becomes split as well.

Good news. Dewhurst losing is likely the first in many dominoes that will fall in states that have been infected with this virus.

As with all infections; the infection is alleviated or eventually the host dies. Both are wins for the voices of moderation.

You guys are about to enter a nuclear winter.
Dress warm.

I'm guessing you're talking about the "nuclear option" that was bandied about a few years ago. Possibly I suppose. Hardly any party that includes the President isn't totally without power and as we all know, Romney isn't going to win.

Sorry....

....I assumed you to be more astute.


Here, let me help:

"As scientists researched the possible ramifications of such a [nuclear] conflict, a new term entered the public vernacular: nuclear winter. If the sight of a mushroom cloud burning above the horizon suggests that the world might end with a bang, then nuclear winter presents the notion that post-World War III humanity might very well die with a whimper....this scenario has permeated our most dismal visions of the future ..."


...most dismal visions of the Left's future.


And you'll owe it all to the magnificent job Barack Hussein Obama (peace be on him) did in awakening the American spirit.
 
The Tea Party does not need to be a majority.

It just needs to be strong enough to jam up the federal works.

It has already shown it can do that.

Ezra Klein (#3 on my list of people I'd like to see run over by a bus), calls this congress "the worst ever". I think it is one of the best I've seen in a long time.

The less that comes out of the D.C. the better.

Go Ted !

People who enter government service to destroy it not only do a disservice to the people, they dishonor the spirit of American greatness.

Awwwwww

Did you learn that in your civics class ?

Didn't think so.

The federal senate was put there to keep an eye on the house in order to prevent them from taking over things that belong to the states.

Your statement is a generlization. Enter what "government" ? Anything that jams up the fed and keeps it out of ares the founders did not intend is O.K. in my book.

Go TED !

ESAD Dante.
 
After 2010, after the crushing defeat in Wisconsin, the victory in Texas, and the grass roots protest against anti Christian bias, the democrats might have a tiny clue. But, sadly, no.

The Tea Party preserved the Democratic majority in the Senate.

Keep up the good work guys!

1. “In the 2010 Midterm Elections, the Republican Party gained 63 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and six seats in theU.S. Senate from the Democratic Party. Republicans also gained six governorships, including Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, andMichigan. Republicans gained 680 seats in state legislatures, the most in the modern era.” 2010 Midterm Elections - Conservapedia

2. Make that seven Senate seats, counting Scott Brown’s special election win in Massachusetts. Combined 2009 and 2010 victories, Republicans won 720 new seats in state legislatures, for a total of 54% of state seats. After 2010, Republicans controlled both chambers in 25 states.
Kibbee, “Hostile Takeover,” p. 130.

How did you guys do....?



3. And...not to put too fine a point on it....


“(WASHINGTON) – On Wednesday, Jeffrey Zients, Acting White House Budget Director, appeared before the House Budget Committee. Mr. Zients was in attendance in order to defend President Obama's proposed $3.8 trillion budget for the fiscal year that begins October 1, 2013. Congressman Huelskamp, a member of the Committee, used the opportunity to ask President Obama's chief budget officer about the impact of the President Obama's budget on the debt. According to the numbers included in the President Obama's budget, gross federal debt is expected to grow to more than $26 trillion in the next decade, up from $10.6 trillion on January 20, 2009. "Mr. Zients danced around the issue, never answering the fundamental question: 'When will President Obama's budget balance?' Since he did not respond to the question, I will: the answer is 'never.' When Will President Obama's Budget Balance? Never.




Bye, bye, Barack......


Now, you be sure to be here November 7th, Chris.......
 
I can just see the NYTimes headline, November 7th...


Obama manages to take the silver....

....Romney comes in next-to-last."


And the usual analysis from the Left: "Women and Minorities Hurt The Most."
 
You guys are about to enter a nuclear winter.
Dress warm.

I'm guessing you're talking about the "nuclear option" that was bandied about a few years ago. Possibly I suppose. Hardly any party that includes the President isn't totally without power and as we all know, Romney isn't going to win.

Sorry....

....I assumed you to be more astute.


Here, let me help:

"As scientists researched the possible ramifications of such a [nuclear] conflict, a new term entered the public vernacular: nuclear winter. If the sight of a mushroom cloud burning above the horizon suggests that the world might end with a bang, then nuclear winter presents the notion that post-World War III humanity might very well die with a whimper....this scenario has permeated our most dismal visions of the future ..."


...most dismal visions of the Left's future.


And you'll owe it all to the magnificent job Barack Hussein Obama (peace be on him) did in awakening the American spirit.

Gee, I gave you the benefit of the doubt on that one. You're choice of analogies is humorous and idiotic.

Look, we had an unbridled Bush not too long ago and we survived that just fine except for the 2 unfunded wars, the unfunded Medicare Part D option and the truly disgusting acts pulled off by the Oval Office concerning Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman. Governor Romney is more like Barack Obama than George W. Bush so I'm not worried either way.

Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal? :deal:
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing you're talking about the "nuclear option" that was bandied about a few years ago. Possibly I suppose. Hardly any party that includes the President isn't totally without power and as we all know, Romney isn't going to win.

Sorry....

....I assumed you to be more astute.


Here, let me help:

"As scientists researched the possible ramifications of such a [nuclear] conflict, a new term entered the public vernacular: nuclear winter. If the sight of a mushroom cloud burning above the horizon suggests that the world might end with a bang, then nuclear winter presents the notion that post-World War III humanity might very well die with a whimper....this scenario has permeated our most dismal visions of the future ..."


...most dismal visions of the Left's future.


And you'll owe it all to the magnificent job Barack Hussein Obama (peace be on him) did in awakening the American spirit.

Gee, I gave you the benefit of the doubt on that one. You're choice of analogies is humorous and idiotic.

Look, we had an unbridled Bush not too long ago and we survived that just fine except for the 2 unfunded wars, the unfunded Medicare Part D option and the truly disgusting acts pulled off by the Oval Office concerning Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman. Governor Romney is more like Barack Obama than George W. Bush so I'm not worried either way.

Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal? :deal:

"Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal?"


Wow! I've been out of town for a few day.....imagine how flattered I am to return and find this proposal on your part!!!

So very charmed that you'd like to establish some sort of long term relationship with me....but I'm rather partial about whom I pal around with.

So...you'll have to be satisfied with the hit-or-miss of random posting.....but, if you're really lonely,...volunteer at a soup kitchen.


And, since only the slowest-witted would vote for this pretender in the people's house, he will lose, and probably by a landslide.
But, if you have the fantasy of victory, and would like to hold it over my head....feel free to save this and my other prognostications along this line, and reprise them November 7th.


Rest assured, I'll have no recollection of you or your tedious orientation.
 
Sorry....

....I assumed you to be more astute.


Here, let me help:

"As scientists researched the possible ramifications of such a [nuclear] conflict, a new term entered the public vernacular: nuclear winter. If the sight of a mushroom cloud burning above the horizon suggests that the world might end with a bang, then nuclear winter presents the notion that post-World War III humanity might very well die with a whimper....this scenario has permeated our most dismal visions of the future ..."


...most dismal visions of the Left's future.


And you'll owe it all to the magnificent job Barack Hussein Obama (peace be on him) did in awakening the American spirit.

Gee, I gave you the benefit of the doubt on that one. You're choice of analogies is humorous and idiotic.

Look, we had an unbridled Bush not too long ago and we survived that just fine except for the 2 unfunded wars, the unfunded Medicare Part D option and the truly disgusting acts pulled off by the Oval Office concerning Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman. Governor Romney is more like Barack Obama than George W. Bush so I'm not worried either way.

Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal? :deal:

"Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal?"


Wow! I've been out of town for a few day.....imagine how flattered I am to return and find this proposal on your part!!!

So very charmed that you'd like to establish some sort of long term relationship with me....but I'm rather partial about whom I pal around with.

So...you'll have to be satisfied with the hit-or-miss of random posting.....but, if you're really lonely,...volunteer at a soup kitchen.


And, since only the slowest-witted would vote for this pretender in the people's house, he will lose, and probably by a landslide.
But, if you have the fantasy of victory, and would like to hold it over my head....feel free to save this and my other prognostications along this line, and reprise them November 7th.


Rest assured, I'll have no recollection of you or your tedious orientation.

In other words, you SAY you're confident but when it comes down to simply risking your sig line for 6 weeks....you're absolutely horrified. Got it.
 
Gee, I gave you the benefit of the doubt on that one. You're choice of analogies is humorous and idiotic.

Look, we had an unbridled Bush not too long ago and we survived that just fine except for the 2 unfunded wars, the unfunded Medicare Part D option and the truly disgusting acts pulled off by the Oval Office concerning Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman. Governor Romney is more like Barack Obama than George W. Bush so I'm not worried either way.

Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal? :deal:

"Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal?"


Wow! I've been out of town for a few day.....imagine how flattered I am to return and find this proposal on your part!!!

So very charmed that you'd like to establish some sort of long term relationship with me....but I'm rather partial about whom I pal around with.

So...you'll have to be satisfied with the hit-or-miss of random posting.....but, if you're really lonely,...volunteer at a soup kitchen.


And, since only the slowest-witted would vote for this pretender in the people's house, he will lose, and probably by a landslide.
But, if you have the fantasy of victory, and would like to hold it over my head....feel free to save this and my other prognostications along this line, and reprise them November 7th.


Rest assured, I'll have no recollection of you or your tedious orientation.

In other words, you SAY you're confident but when it comes down to simply risking your sig line for 6 weeks....you're absolutely horrified. Got it.

1. I always say what I mean. Always.

2. "you're absolutely horrified."

.…you have the assurance that arises from the affirmation of absurdity.

Never fails. The most insignificant often have the greatest self-esteem.
That would be you.
Can I assume you to be a product of government schools?


3. Nor do I allow the nugatory to manipulate me.....

....get my drift?


4. On the bright side, though, you are refreshingly without depth.
One gets tired of all these ‘still waters that run deep.’ You, on the other hand, are a fast-running, shallow stream…one can even touch bottom with you.
Filled with nothing...you challenge me to treat you as an equal.
Absurd.
 
"Since you're so optimistic about the governor's chances though, would you like to take me up on the sig line wager that Rabbi is too chickenshit to accept? Surely you're not all talk too, right?

So how about it? Do we have a deal?"


Wow! I've been out of town for a few day.....imagine how flattered I am to return and find this proposal on your part!!!

So very charmed that you'd like to establish some sort of long term relationship with me....but I'm rather partial about whom I pal around with.

So...you'll have to be satisfied with the hit-or-miss of random posting.....but, if you're really lonely,...volunteer at a soup kitchen.


And, since only the slowest-witted would vote for this pretender in the people's house, he will lose, and probably by a landslide.
But, if you have the fantasy of victory, and would like to hold it over my head....feel free to save this and my other prognostications along this line, and reprise them November 7th.


Rest assured, I'll have no recollection of you or your tedious orientation.

In other words, you SAY you're confident but when it comes down to simply risking your sig line for 6 weeks....you're absolutely horrified. Got it.

1. I always say what I mean. Always.

2. "you're absolutely horrified."

.…you have the assurance that arises from the affirmation of absurdity.

Never fails. The most insignificant often have the greatest self-esteem.
That would be you.
Can I assume you to be a product of government schools?


3. Nor do I allow the nugatory to manipulate me.....

....get my drift?


4. On the bright side, though, you are refreshingly without depth.
One gets tired of all these ‘still waters that run deep.’ You, on the other hand, are a fast-running, shallow stream…one can even touch bottom with you.
Filled with nothing...you challenge me to treat you as an equal.
Absurd.

Too long.
Didn't read.
Don't care.

Either you'll accept the challenge or not.

Care to wager sig lines since you're not in doubt?

If Governor Romney wins, I change my sig line to "All hail President Romney, your President, my President, our President" and leave it there until 12/31/13.

If President Obama wins, you change your sig line to "All hail President Obama, your President, my President, our President" and leave it there only until 1/1/13

Font size =3, blue font face in bold. Arial font.

You really ARE as confident as you just stated you are, aren't you?
 
In other words, you SAY you're confident but when it comes down to simply risking your sig line for 6 weeks....you're absolutely horrified. Got it.

1. I always say what I mean. Always.

2. "you're absolutely horrified."

.…you have the assurance that arises from the affirmation of absurdity.

Never fails. The most insignificant often have the greatest self-esteem.
That would be you.
Can I assume you to be a product of government schools?


3. Nor do I allow the nugatory to manipulate me.....

....get my drift?


4. On the bright side, though, you are refreshingly without depth.
One gets tired of all these ‘still waters that run deep.’ You, on the other hand, are a fast-running, shallow stream…one can even touch bottom with you.
Filled with nothing...you challenge me to treat you as an equal.
Absurd.

Too long.
Didn't read.
Don't care.

Either you'll accept the challenge or not.

Care to wager sig lines since you're not in doubt?

If Governor Romney wins, I change my sig line to "All hail President Romney, your President, my President, our President" and leave it there until 12/31/13.

If President Obama wins, you change your sig line to "All hail President Obama, your President, my President, our President" and leave it there only until 1/1/13

Font size =3, blue font face in bold. Arial font.

You really ARE as confident as you just stated you are, aren't you?

You read it.

And you understood it.


Be gone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top