Tea Party activist confronts Obama on Biden calling them terrorists.

Oh, btw.

The Tea Party member that questioned Obama is basically unemployed.

When Obama took over most of the auto industry he put Ryan Rhodes, who was a car-salesman, out of business. The car dealership he worked at was closed thanks to Obama's policies.


Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So 0bama did nothing since coming into office 1/20/2009?

Ahh yes... The 0bama motto: The Buck Stops Elsewhere


Jeezus, some of you flaming liberals are fucking stupid...

And once again, another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger parrot shoots his beak off about something he knows nothing about.

Here genius, learn what happened DESPITE the filibuster crazed Party of No (aka the Republican House/Senate):

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center
 
Oh, btw.

The Tea Party member that questioned Obama is basically unemployed.

When Obama took over most of the auto industry he put Ryan Rhodes, who was a car-salesman, out of business. The car dealership he worked at was closed thanks to Obama's policies.


Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.
But, but, but, but, Obama has been claiming it's the ATM'S, internet, Earthquakes, Tsunami's, Tea Partiers, Republicans, Arab Springs, BAD LUCK, and of course Bush.

So tell us, lib, what's your excuse for Obama's abject failure?

This ought to be entertaining.:eusa_whistle:

The only entertaining thing to your response is seeing yet another neocon/teabagger jackass bray nothing but dodges and BS. Neither you or your idiot compadre could counter my proving him wrong on his assertion, so instead you want me to literally prove a negative via your inane "question".

Run-a-long, you wickedly stupid Jester....you're a bigger joke than you realize.
 
Oh, btw.

The Tea Party member that questioned Obama is basically unemployed.

When Obama took over most of the auto industry he put Ryan Rhodes, who was a car-salesman, out of business. The car dealership he worked at was closed thanks to Obama's policies.


Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

obama was a senator anything bush did for the economy obama approved of it. obama is just as guilty as any other member of congress that supported Bushes fail economical policey.


And of course, you can provide Obama's ENTIRE voting record during the Shrub's terms to substantiate your claim? I'll wait.
 
Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So 0bama did nothing since coming into office 1/20/2009?

Ahh yes... The 0bama motto: The Buck Stops Elsewhere


Jeezus, some of you flaming liberals are fucking stupid...
The buck stop with obama unless it's the economy and helping our enemies in Libya.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIviu4T0pD4]Obama: 'The buck stops here' - YouTube[/ame]


Let's see, I proved Mud dead wrong on his assertion and have yet to see him supply some fact based proof of his "Ryan Rhodes" claim.

Instead, I get some 6th grade retorts from Dr. House and the BigReb fool...both long on accusations, unsubstantiated claims, supposition and conjecture.

Maybe this will teach the rest of American NOT to sit on their hands during the next voting cycle. None of these neocon numbskulls can't prove what they are accusing Biden of....pathetic.
 
Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So 0bama did nothing since coming into office 1/20/2009?

Ahh yes... The 0bama motto: The Buck Stops Elsewhere


Jeezus, some of you flaming liberals are fucking stupid...

And once again, another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger parrot shoots his beak off about something he knows nothing about.

Here genius, learn what happened DESPITE the filibuster crazed Party of No (aka the Republican House/Senate):

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center
Yeah, all that BS will definitely get him re-elected.........The 16% (actual number) of unemployed are really going to give a shit about all of that, come November of '12.

Fuckin' LMAO!

If he's such a success, why does he continually blame, "ATM's, the internet, Earthquakes, Tsunami's, Tea Partiers, Republicans, Arab Springs, BAD LUCK", and whatever other ridiculous excuses he puts out there?

If he was such a great, successful leader, why would he need all these asinine excuses?

Face it, the man has miserably failed. He's econimically illiterate. His leadership is the worst this country has ever seen, period.
 
So 0bama did nothing since coming into office 1/20/2009?

Ahh yes... The 0bama motto: The Buck Stops Elsewhere


Jeezus, some of you flaming liberals are fucking stupid...

And once again, another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger parrot shoots his beak off about something he knows nothing about.

Here genius, learn what happened DESPITE the filibuster crazed Party of No (aka the Republican House/Senate):

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center
Yeah, all that BS will definitely get him re-elected.........The 16% (actual number) of unemployed are really going to give a shit about all of that, come November of '12.

Fuckin' LMAO!

If he's such a success, why does he continually blame, "ATM's, the internet, Earthquakes, Tsunami's, Tea Partiers, Republicans, Arab Springs, BAD LUCK", and whatever other ridiculous excuses he puts out there?

If he was such a great, successful leader, why would he need all these asinine excuses?

Face it, the man has miserably failed. He's econimically illiterate. His leadership is the worst this country has ever seen, period.

And there you have it folks......another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger flunkie makes a claim, is proven wrong with documented facts, and then doesn't have the cojones just to acknowledge he's wrong on that point. Instead, he just regurgitates more right wingnut radio talking points and his previous BS.

And if the Dem party does it right....all they have to do is remind the folks WHO put them on the unemployment lines and WHO wants to protect the folks that outsourced their jobs and WHO did not want to extend unemployment. Yeah, you teabagging bumpkin, all THAT shit will be on the voters minds.

One wickedly willing idiot Jester for the neocon/teabagger cause. Carry on, my foolish Jester! :lol:
 
Last edited:
And once again, another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger parrot shoots his beak off about something he knows nothing about.

Here genius, learn what happened DESPITE the filibuster crazed Party of No (aka the Republican House/Senate):

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center
Yeah, all that BS will definitely get him re-elected.........The 16% (actual number) of unemployed are really going to give a shit about all of that, come November of '12.

Fuckin' LMAO!

If he's such a success, why does he continually blame, "ATM's, the internet, Earthquakes, Tsunami's, Tea Partiers, Republicans, Arab Springs, BAD LUCK", and whatever other ridiculous excuses he puts out there?

If he was such a great, successful leader, why would he need all these asinine excuses?

Face it, the man has miserably failed. He's econimically illiterate. His leadership is the worst this country has ever seen, period.

And there you have it folks......another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger flunkie makes a claim, is proven wrong with documented facts, and then doesn't have the cojones just to acknowledge he's wrong on that point. Instead, he just regurgitates more right wingnut radio talking points and his previous BS.

And if the Dem party does it right....all they have to do is remind the folks WHO put them on the unemployment lines and WHO wants to protect the folks that outsourced their jobs and WHO did not want to extend unemployment. Yeah, you teabagging bumpkin, all THAT shit will be on the voters minds.

One wickedly willing idiot Jester for the neocon/teabagger cause. Carry on, my foolish Jester! :lol:
You liberal slapdicks have one major problem........The independents are dropping him in droves.......Without 'em, his sorry ass is getting kicked back to the 'burb's of Chicago where his inept ass belongs.

Now, how about showing us that economic success.

Show us all those jobs that have been created under his leadership.

Show us the lowered unemployment rate.

Show us how he lowered the debt, tackled the deficit, balaced the budget, lowered spending, decreased borrowing.

Show us the meat and potato's that the voters are going to be looking for come election day....Don't show us what you liberal loons want to see......Show us what clear thinking voters are going to want to see.......What those who are desperate for jobs are going to want to see.

Recent polling is showing that over 70% of americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.......That's the most telling sign. That's the most important issue. It's the issue that will decide the election.

I keep asking you Obamabots to put up, and you Obamabots just never seem to be able to put up.

Now, why might that be?

Can you do it, without resorting to spin, deflection and name calling?

I'll be waiting:eusa_whistle:
 
Yeah, all that BS will definitely get him re-elected.........The 16% (actual number) of unemployed are really going to give a shit about all of that, come November of '12.

Fuckin' LMAO!

If he's such a success, why does he continually blame, "ATM's, the internet, Earthquakes, Tsunami's, Tea Partiers, Republicans, Arab Springs, BAD LUCK", and whatever other ridiculous excuses he puts out there?

If he was such a great, successful leader, why would he need all these asinine excuses?

Face it, the man has miserably failed. He's econimically illiterate. His leadership is the worst this country has ever seen, period.

And there you have it folks......another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger flunkie makes a claim, is proven wrong with documented facts, and then doesn't have the cojones just to acknowledge he's wrong on that point. Instead, he just regurgitates more right wingnut radio talking points and his previous BS.

And if the Dem party does it right....all they have to do is remind the folks WHO put them on the unemployment lines and WHO wants to protect the folks that outsourced their jobs and WHO did not want to extend unemployment. Yeah, you teabagging bumpkin, all THAT shit will be on the voters minds.

One wickedly willing idiot Jester for the neocon/teabagger cause. Carry on, my foolish Jester! :lol:
You liberal slapdicks have one major problem........The independents are dropping him in droves.......Without 'em, his sorry ass is getting kicked back to the 'burb's of Chicago where his inept ass belongs.

Now, how about showing us that economic success.

Show us all those jobs that have been created under his leadership.

Show us the lowered unemployment rate.

Show us how he lowered the debt, tackled the deficit, balaced the budget, lowered spending, decreased borrowing.

Show us the meat and potato's that the voters are going to be looking for come election day....Don't show us what you liberal loons want to see......Show us what clear thinking voters are going to want to see.......What those who are desperate for jobs are going to want to see.

Recent polling is showing that over 70% of americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.......That's the most telling sign. That's the most important issue. It's the issue that will decide the election.

I keep asking you Obamabots to put up, and you Obamabots just never seem to be able to put up.

Now, why might that be?

Can you do it, without resorting to spin, deflection and name calling?

I'll be waiting:eusa_whistle:


As the chronology of the posts shows, I provided a link that details the accomplishments of this present administration thus far and what's on the table to be implemented. To date, the neocon/teabagger toadies REFUSE to acknowledge, let alone READ that information. Instead, they just barrel along parroting all the accusations and innuendos and mantras they've learned SO well from the neocon punditry via the likes of WND, Crowley, Limbaugh, Levin and the Washington Times....a clear sign of the willful ignorance that so defines the likes of the Wicked Jester.

The Jester is making me laugh, indeed! :lol:
 
And there you have it folks......another intellectually bankrupt neocon/teabagger flunkie makes a claim, is proven wrong with documented facts, and then doesn't have the cojones just to acknowledge he's wrong on that point. Instead, he just regurgitates more right wingnut radio talking points and his previous BS.

And if the Dem party does it right....all they have to do is remind the folks WHO put them on the unemployment lines and WHO wants to protect the folks that outsourced their jobs and WHO did not want to extend unemployment. Yeah, you teabagging bumpkin, all THAT shit will be on the voters minds.

One wickedly willing idiot Jester for the neocon/teabagger cause. Carry on, my foolish Jester! :lol:
You liberal slapdicks have one major problem........The independents are dropping him in droves.......Without 'em, his sorry ass is getting kicked back to the 'burb's of Chicago where his inept ass belongs.

Now, how about showing us that economic success.

Show us all those jobs that have been created under his leadership.

Show us the lowered unemployment rate.

Show us how he lowered the debt, tackled the deficit, balaced the budget, lowered spending, decreased borrowing.

Show us the meat and potato's that the voters are going to be looking for come election day....Don't show us what you liberal loons want to see......Show us what clear thinking voters are going to want to see.......What those who are desperate for jobs are going to want to see.

Recent polling is showing that over 70% of americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.......That's the most telling sign. That's the most important issue. It's the issue that will decide the election.

I keep asking you Obamabots to put up, and you Obamabots just never seem to be able to put up.

Now, why might that be?

Can you do it, without resorting to spin, deflection and name calling?

I'll be waiting:eusa_whistle:


As the chronology of the posts shows, I provided a link that details the accomplishments of this present administration thus far and what's on the table to be implemented. To date, the neocon/teabagger toadies REFUSE to acknowledge, let alone READ that information. Instead, they just barrel along parroting all the accusations and innuendos and mantras they've learned SO well from the neocon punditry via the likes of WND, Crowley, Limbaugh, Levin and the Washington Times....a clear sign of the willful ignorance that so defines the likes of the Wicked Jester.

The Jester is making me laugh, indeed! :lol:
Yeah, that's what I thought, you can't do it.

If what you provided earlier was what the voters want to hear, 70%+ would not be showing disaproval of his handling of the economy, which is what will decide the election.

It's the main issue that is causing independents to drop their support. Along with his lack of leadership on many issues.

Now, care to try to again, without spin and deflection?
 
Last edited:
Oh, btw.

The Tea Party member that questioned Obama is basically unemployed.

When Obama took over most of the auto industry he put Ryan Rhodes, who was a car-salesman, out of business. The car dealership he worked at was closed thanks to Obama's policies.


Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So Barack Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush and the Pelosi Congress. It's not something that Obama only realized when he walked into the Oval Office for the first time as President. If you'll recall he said he had a plan and he was going to hit the ground running to fix the economy. So what did he do with his majorities in the House and Senate? He put the economy on the back burner and spent a year and a half on trying to pass his signature health care plan.

My question to you is a simple one...

Why would anyone reelect this man when our economy continues to flounder and he's shown zero aptitude for fixing it? Obama ran out of ideas when his little Keynesian stimulus plan never got off the launching pad. Summers and Romer both fled Washington for safe haven at Harvard and Berkeley. Geithner continues to be just as clueless at running the Treasury as he was at figuring out Turbo Tax. You can't seriously want to give these people another four years.

The "academics and community organizers" had their shot. They've failed miserably. Let's get some folks in there that actually understand economics and businesses.
 
You liberal slapdicks have one major problem........The independents are dropping him in droves.......Without 'em, his sorry ass is getting kicked back to the 'burb's of Chicago where his inept ass belongs.

Now, how about showing us that economic success.

Show us all those jobs that have been created under his leadership.

Show us the lowered unemployment rate.

Show us how he lowered the debt, tackled the deficit, balaced the budget, lowered spending, decreased borrowing.

Show us the meat and potato's that the voters are going to be looking for come election day....Don't show us what you liberal loons want to see......Show us what clear thinking voters are going to want to see.......What those who are desperate for jobs are going to want to see.

Recent polling is showing that over 70% of americans disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy.......That's the most telling sign. That's the most important issue. It's the issue that will decide the election.

I keep asking you Obamabots to put up, and you Obamabots just never seem to be able to put up.

Now, why might that be?

Can you do it, without resorting to spin, deflection and name calling?

I'll be waiting:eusa_whistle:


As the chronology of the posts shows, I provided a link that details the accomplishments of this present administration thus far and what's on the table to be implemented. To date, the neocon/teabagger toadies REFUSE to acknowledge, let alone READ that information. Instead, they just barrel along parroting all the accusations and innuendos and mantras they've learned SO well from the neocon punditry via the likes of WND, Crowley, Limbaugh, Levin and the Washington Times....a clear sign of the willful ignorance that so defines the likes of the Wicked Jester.

The Jester is making me laugh, indeed! :lol:
Yeah, that's what I thought, you can't do it.

If what you provided earlier was what the voters want to hear, 70%+ would not be showing disaproval of his handling of the economy, which is what will decide the election.

It's the main issue that is causing independents to drop their support. Along with his lack of leadership on many issues.

Now, care to try to again, without spin and deflection?

Once again, the Wicked Jester bullhorns the neocon/teabagger platitudes while desperately ignoring facts.

This is what the Wicked (ly stupid) Jester refuses to deal with, folks:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

So let's watch WJ just blather on while avoiding discussion of contrary facts. What a neocon/teabagging buffoon!
 
Oh, btw.

The Tea Party member that questioned Obama is basically unemployed.

When Obama took over most of the auto industry he put Ryan Rhodes, who was a car-salesman, out of business. The car dealership he worked at was closed thanks to Obama's policies.


Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So Barack Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush and the Pelosi Congress. It's not something that Obama only realized when he walked into the Oval Office for the first time as President. If you'll recall he said he had a plan and he was going to hit the ground running to fix the economy. So what did he do with his majorities in the House and Senate? He put the economy on the back burner and spent a year and a half on trying to pass his signature health care plan.

My question to you is a simple one...

Why would anyone reelect this man when our economy continues to flounder and he's shown zero aptitude for fixing it? Obama ran out of ideas when his little Keynesian stimulus plan never got off the launching pad. Summers and Romer both fled Washington for safe haven at Harvard and Berkeley. Geithner continues to be just as clueless at running the Treasury as he was at figuring out Turbo Tax. You can't seriously want to give these people another four years.

The "academics and community organizers" had their shot. They've failed miserably. Let's get some folks in there that actually understand economics and businesses.

The initial and major flaw in your analysis and assertions is that you forget the FACT that Pelosi and the Dem party DID NOT have the majority vote in the Senate, where the GOP blocked progress considerably. Also, you forget the FACT that the Party of NO (aka the Republicans) went filibuster crazy and voted lock step AGAINST ANY proposal from the administration. So what finally did get done was not without GOP approval.
The GOP made the healthcare bill it's beachhead, as GOP leadership stated that it was their primary mission to make Obama a one term president at any cost. Hell, Boehner stated that if defeating Obama meant trashing thousands of new gov't jobs for people, then so be it!

You also forget the FACT that the Geithner was the Shrub's boy.....good riddence to him.

Essentially, you're just regurgitating the myopic mantras of the GOP punditry anti-Obama crowd....which seems a little stupid when you read the following:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)
Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

And furthermore, since Obama INHERITED this shitpile of an economy along with an obsitinate GOP out to get him, what makes YOU think that the American people are that fucking dumb to elect a repeat of the mindset that got us here in the first place?
 
Last edited:
As the chronology of the posts shows, I provided a link that details the accomplishments of this present administration thus far and what's on the table to be implemented. To date, the neocon/teabagger toadies REFUSE to acknowledge, let alone READ that information. Instead, they just barrel along parroting all the accusations and innuendos and mantras they've learned SO well from the neocon punditry via the likes of WND, Crowley, Limbaugh, Levin and the Washington Times....a clear sign of the willful ignorance that so defines the likes of the Wicked Jester.

The Jester is making me laugh, indeed! :lol:
Yeah, that's what I thought, you can't do it.

If what you provided earlier was what the voters want to hear, 70%+ would not be showing disaproval of his handling of the economy, which is what will decide the election.

It's the main issue that is causing independents to drop their support. Along with his lack of leadership on many issues.

Now, care to try to again, without spin and deflection?

Once again, the Wicked Jester bullhorns the neocon/teabagger platitudes while desperately ignoring facts.

This is what the Wicked (ly stupid) Jester refuses to deal with, folks:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

So let's watch WJ just blather on while avoiding discussion of contrary facts. What a neocon/teabagging buffoon!
Yep, that's what I thought.....You've got nothing to ddress the issue that will no doubt decide the election.

Thanks for playing.

Now, get in line with all the other lil' Obamabot sheep, and follow your failed leader right over the cliff. Ya' fuckin' liberal pussy.
 
Yeah, that's what I thought, you can't do it.

If what you provided earlier was what the voters want to hear, 70%+ would not be showing disaproval of his handling of the economy, which is what will decide the election.

It's the main issue that is causing independents to drop their support. Along with his lack of leadership on many issues.

Now, care to try to again, without spin and deflection?

Once again, the Wicked Jester bullhorns the neocon/teabagger platitudes while desperately ignoring facts.

This is what the Wicked (ly stupid) Jester refuses to deal with, folks:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

So let's watch WJ just blather on while avoiding discussion of contrary facts. What a neocon/teabagging buffoon!
Yep, that's what I thought.....You've got nothing to ddress the issue that will no doubt decide the election.

Thanks for playing.

Now, get in line with all the other lil' Obamabot sheep, and follow your failed leader right over the cliff. Ya' fuckin' liberal pussy.


And there you have it folks, just like I said. Intellectually bankrupt and dishonest neocon/teabagging toadies like Jester here don't DARE have a real point for point discussion of FACTS that contradict their mantras. Instead, the Jester bluffs and blusters and concocts some lie that the chronology of the posts readily exposes.

Bottom line: no one can produce any valid documentation that Biden stated what he's accused of...and neocon/teabagger cowards deny the documented list of Obama accomplishments thus far.

I'm done kicking this dumb donkey of a Wicked Jester ....now Wicked Jester will just repeat his BS and false accusations/statements 6 ways to Sunday, with probably some maudlin kudos from his equally dim cohorts. The last word, no matter how childish, is more important than honesty and facts to the Jester. So much more to pity him.

Adios.
 
Let the Teabagger blame the Shrub for his unemployment, because the fiscal conclusion of the Shrub's budget policy action came in 2009....in other words, in 2009 Obama inherited the shit pile the Shrub left.

As for "Ryan Rhodes" more unsubstantiated supposition and conjecture from our neocon parrot Mud.

So Barack Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush and the Pelosi Congress. It's not something that Obama only realized when he walked into the Oval Office for the first time as President. If you'll recall he said he had a plan and he was going to hit the ground running to fix the economy. So what did he do with his majorities in the House and Senate? He put the economy on the back burner and spent a year and a half on trying to pass his signature health care plan.

My question to you is a simple one...

Why would anyone reelect this man when our economy continues to flounder and he's shown zero aptitude for fixing it? Obama ran out of ideas when his little Keynesian stimulus plan never got off the launching pad. Summers and Romer both fled Washington for safe haven at Harvard and Berkeley. Geithner continues to be just as clueless at running the Treasury as he was at figuring out Turbo Tax. You can't seriously want to give these people another four years.

The "academics and community organizers" had their shot. They've failed miserably. Let's get some folks in there that actually understand economics and businesses.

The initial and major flaw in your analysis and assertions is that you forget the FACT that Pelosi and the Dem party DID NOT have the majority vote in the Senate, where the GOP blocked progress considerably. Also, you forget the FACT that the Party of NO (aka the Republicans) went filibuster crazy and voted lock step AGAINST ANY proposal from the administration. So what finally did get done was not without GOP approval.
The GOP made the healthcare bill it's beachhead, as GOP leadership stated that it was their primary mission to make Obama a one term president at any cost. Hell, Boehner stated that if defeating Obama meant trashing thousands of new gov't jobs for people, then so be it!

You also forget the FACT that the Geithner was the Shrub's boy.....good riddence to him.

Essentially, you're just regurgitating the myopic mantras of the GOP punditry anti-Obama crowd....which seems a little stupid when you read the following:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)
Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

And furthermore, since Obama INHERITED this shitpile of an economy along with an obsitinate GOP out to get him, what makes YOU think that the American people are that fucking dumb to elect a repeat of the mindset that got us here in the first place?

First of all...Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House. She didn't run the Senate. That would be Harry Reid. Since both of the independents, Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman, caucused with the Democrats then Harry Reid did in fact have 60 Senators to work with. That my friend is a super majority in both the House and the Senate. What jobs program of Barack Obama is it that you think the Republican minority blocked? I'd be most interested in hearing what he wanted that he didn't get because of Republican obstruction. I think that if you look at what was happening back then you'll see that it wasn't Republican's who held up Obama's most liberal ideas...it was the Blue Dog Democrats. You should thank your lucky stars that they did, by the way or we would now be reeling from the effects of the Cap & Trade legislation that Barack, Nancy and Harry wanted so badly. If not for the Blue Dogs our economy would be in even worse shape than it is now.

As for your charge that Geithner is Bush's boy? How do you figure? He was brought in to work under Larry Summers in the Clinton Administration...then was brought back to be the Treasury Secretary under Obama. How is Timothy Geithner "Shrub's boy"?

I don't think the American people ARE that dumb actually. I think they gave Obama a shot despite his total lack of executive and legislative experience, based on his supposed "intellect" and some vague vision of Hope and Change. It's been quite apparent that he's in way over his head on most things but glaringly so when it comes to the economy. He took some really bad advice from Larry Summers and Christina Romer and now he's stuck with the results while those two fled back to academia. I think the American people realize only too well that they made a mistake in '08. They made that abundantly clear during the mid-term elections.
 
Last edited:
No question that after November, 2012, He is dogmeat. Only question is whether USDA would allow that use. There are, after all, standards which must be upheld.

Ahhh, yet another neocon/teabagger toadie who doesn't have the courage to admit that NO ONE on this thread has factually proven that Biden uttered the phrase beyond hearsay and supposition. So Henry just spews hopeful mantras.
 
No question that after November, 2012, He is dogmeat. Only question is whether USDA would allow that use. There are, after all, standards which must be upheld.

Ahhh, yet another neocon/teabagger toadie who doesn't have the courage to admit that NO ONE on this thread has factually proven that Biden uttered the phrase beyond hearsay and supposition. So Henry just spews hopeful mantras.

Not to mention: All the shit the lot of them sling at the president on a daily basis? They better be able to take it. Awww, somebody hurt their itto tater peelings? Man the fuck up.

Losers.
 
So Barack Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush and the Pelosi Congress. It's not something that Obama only realized when he walked into the Oval Office for the first time as President. If you'll recall he said he had a plan and he was going to hit the ground running to fix the economy. So what did he do with his majorities in the House and Senate? He put the economy on the back burner and spent a year and a half on trying to pass his signature health care plan.

My question to you is a simple one...

Why would anyone reelect this man when our economy continues to flounder and he's shown zero aptitude for fixing it? Obama ran out of ideas when his little Keynesian stimulus plan never got off the launching pad. Summers and Romer both fled Washington for safe haven at Harvard and Berkeley. Geithner continues to be just as clueless at running the Treasury as he was at figuring out Turbo Tax. You can't seriously want to give these people another four years.

The "academics and community organizers" had their shot. They've failed miserably. Let's get some folks in there that actually understand economics and businesses.

The initial and major flaw in your analysis and assertions is that you forget the FACT that Pelosi and the Dem party DID NOT have the majority vote in the Senate, where the GOP blocked progress considerably. Also, you forget the FACT that the Party of NO (aka the Republicans) went filibuster crazy and voted lock step AGAINST ANY proposal from the administration. So what finally did get done was not without GOP approval.
The GOP made the healthcare bill it's beachhead, as GOP leadership stated that it was their primary mission to make Obama a one term president at any cost. Hell, Boehner stated that if defeating Obama meant trashing thousands of new gov't jobs for people, then so be it!

You also forget the FACT that the Geithner was the Shrub's boy.....good riddence to him.

Essentially, you're just regurgitating the myopic mantras of the GOP punditry anti-Obama crowd....which seems a little stupid when you read the following:

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)
Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center

And furthermore, since Obama INHERITED this shitpile of an economy along with an obsitinate GOP out to get him, what makes YOU think that the American people are that fucking dumb to elect a repeat of the mindset that got us here in the first place?

First of all...Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House. She didn't run the Senate. No shit sherlock! That doesn't change the FACT that the GOP held sway in the Senate, where all bills eventually were stopped. That would be Harry Reid. Since both of the independents, Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman, caucused with the Democrats then Harry Reid did in fact have 60 Senators to work with. ...That my friend is a super majority in both the House and the Senate. Wrong again, genius. Lieberman had LONG established that he was NOT siding with Dems since 2004...long before his re-election where he switched in 2008 the Dems did not have 60 seats, and then Kennedy died What jobs program of Barack Obama is it that you think the Republican minority blocked? I'd be most interested in hearing what he wanted that he didn't get because of Republican obstruction. An example: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/15/AR2011021506858.htmlI think that if you look at what was happening back then you'll see that it wasn't Republican's who held up Obama's most liberal ideas...it was the Blue Dog Democrats. Do some research to see the number of the "bluedogs" compared to the lock step vote of the filibuster happy GOP
You should thank your lucky stars that they did, by the way or we would now be reeling from the effects of the Cap & Trade legislation that Barack, Nancy and Harry wanted so badly. If not for the Blue Dogs our economy would be in even worse shape than it is now.
Pure supposition and conjecture on your part based on incorrect analogy of the real make up of the House and Senate and what has transpired.
As for your charge that Geithner is Bush's boy? How do you figure? He was brought in to work under Larry Summers in the Clinton Administration...then was brought back to be the Treasury Secretary under Obama. How is Timothy Geithner "Shrub's boy"?

True enough...but given his positions during the Shrub's reign, he was one of the key people during the financial boondoggles regarding Wall St. and the banking/housing market shennanigans that could have put out road blocks, or at least blown the whistle big time. Instead, he was a facilitator of the Shrub's deregulation and "reaganomics" on steroids. So I AM INCORRECT TO SAY HE WAS SOLELY THE "SHRUB'S BOY".

I don't think the American people ARE that dumb actually. I think they gave Obama a shot despite his total lack of executive and legislative experience, based on his supposed "intellect" and some vague vision of Hope and Change. AND THE FACT THAT THEY REALIZED WHAT A TOTAL FUCK UP THE SHRUB AND HIS ADMINISTRATION WAS....GIVEN IRAQ AND THE WALL ST./BANKER DEBACLE. It's been quite apparent that he's in way over his head on most things but glaringly so when it comes to the economy. SAYS THE NEOCON/TEABAGGER pundits and parrots.....the rest of America is pissed that he's bending over backward to appease the Party of No, and being more center to the right than he lead on in his campaign. He took some really bad advice from Larry Summers and Christina Romer and now he's stuck with the results while those two fled back to academia. Not quite the way you portray it.....YOU may not like Summers and Romer advice, but their changing jobs to the private sector (cha-ching$$) is not abandoning ship as you would like to have it. I think the American people realize only too well that they made a mistake in '08. They made that abundantly clear during the mid-term elections.

In reality, 2010 had a LOW voter turnout, as many people PUBLICALLY stated that they sat on their hands as a protest to the Dems and Obama to quit being wussies. Now realizing that they've let the right wingnuts run he asylum, 2012 will seek to stop that neocon/teabagger disease in it's tracks.
 
I thought liberal's were into this "lowering the rhetoric" thing? What happened to the "kum ba ya" after the congressman got shot? Oh, that's right, it's just for the conservatives.

I followed tacihiliberal's link and read only the section's labeled "ENERGY". I still can't stop laughing. If you knew ANYTHING about the oil business and what is happening with coal, you'd laugh. Either that or you'd cry. More like weep.

Hope and Change...
 

Forum List

Back
Top