Was hunter Biden Qualified To Be On The Board Of Burisma?

It's only because of his addictions making it unlikely that he would be a good candidate for the job. And then White's suggestions that he might have been.

Come on proc, ducks swim!

Was he addicted at the time? We all know people who have used and have not been addicted .. like drinkers who are not alcoholics.

You people are just so sleazy in your attacks.
 
Makes you wonder how successful educated people can just lose it, fking up their life and the lives of many around them. Some peoples kids, I swear! :mad:
It makes me think of how the president's son could be lying on an Opium mat completely comatose, and the Ukraine would be looking at his resume'.
 
Why are you people so focused on Hunter Biden and his personal issues?

Why?
No one gives a flying doughnut about that crackhead loser.
What people care about is the mountain of circumstances surrounding his activity with foreign governments and foreign companies in connection with his father when he was Vice President.
 
It makes me think of how the president's son could be lying on an Opium mat completely comatose, and the Ukraine would be looking at his resume'.
I doubt the opium mat picture with the little girl was sent with the resume. If Joe had not run for President, we probably would not know any of this, but if you can't get a good bite on the politician, did up dirt on his family and friends. Ain't America great!:cool:
 
Does it matter OP? The company hired him, so clearly they felt he was capable of doing the job.

That said, was Jared Kushner qualified for the position/s he held in the Trump Administration?
 
First:

On Capitol Hill, Raju asked Jordan about the original filing from the ex-informant and how it could be “corroborating” now. Jordan argued that Smirnov being discredited does not change the core facts he’s focusing on.

“It doesn’t change the four fundamental facts. Hunter Biden was put on the board of Burisma and gets paid a million dollars a year. Fact number two, he’s not qualified to be on the board. He said so himself in an interview with, I don’t know, you or some network,” Jordan told Raju.

The Republican congressman was referring to a 2019 ABC interview with Hunter Biden in which he admitted he likely would not have been on the Burisma board if it were not for his last name. He also said in the interview that he was “completely qualified to be on the board.”

‘It’s Not True!’ CNN’s Manu Raju Confronts a Defiant Jim Jordan Over Debunked Biden Claims
--

Representative Jordan as usual, had things mixed up, conflated things and was spouting nonsense. Nonsense because he referred to an interview where Hunter Biden actually said he was “completely qualified to be on the board.” Hunter had admitted (why lie?), he most likely would not have been on the Burisma board, if it were not for his last name. Hmm... Guy sounds honest in that interview. More than can be said for most of the people attacking him, as even the witnesses brought before congressional committees ended up making the 'investigative hearings' look like fishing expeditions coming up empty.
Peddling influence because of your political connections is corrupt, in case you didn't understand that. It's not something to admire just because you admit it.
 
Peddling influence because of your political connections is corrupt, in case you didn't understand that. It's not something to admire just because you admit it.
btw, It's what all of the Lobbyists that were in the Trump admin have been doing

 
Does it matter OP? The company hired him, so clearly they felt he was capable of doing the job.

That said, was Jared Kushner qualified for the position/s he held in the Trump Administration?
Not the same thing. Kushner was doing a job. Biden was occupying a chair because of his name. He admitted he wasn't qualified.
 
Not the same thing. Kushner was doing a job. Biden was occupying a chair because of his name. He admitted he wasn't qualified.
What do you mean by "it's not the same thing?"

Is the underlying principle here that an individual is not qualified for their job but being placed there due to who they are, or is it something else?

Please clarify.
 
Russian agents collude and American agents collude. That's the job they are hired to do. And it should be stated that America starts a lot of wars. Russia is a huge threat to America, there's little doubt about that! Some will call that moral justification for a war.
None of that has a thing to do with the OP.
 
What do you mean by "it's not the same thing?"

Is the underlying principle here that an individual is not qualified for their job but being placed there due to who they are, or is it something else?

Please clarify.
Kushner was qualified to do his job. Hunter wasn't.
 
Russian agents collude and American agents collude.
That's the job they are hired to do.

And it should be stated that America starts a lot of wars.

Russia is a huge threat to America, there's little doubt about that! Some will call that moral justification for a war.
Russia is not a huge threat to America. Idiots like you consuming the garbage they call news are the threat.
 

Forum List

Back
Top