Tea Partiers have a better grasp of science...how embarassing!

But I'm not a liberal. Who told you that?

Your blind support for all liberal policies.
Your arguments defending the monstrosity called Obama care.
Your arguments for cutting the military, your desire to appease our enemies.
What you say basically.
You are a far left fanatical liberal totalitarian of the Obamacult.
So are you a rape apologist or an Uncle Tom?

But I dont support all liberal policies. Who told you that I did?

You must , if every Christian nut is representative of the tea party.
You do broad brush constantly?
Tell me about those multigenerational race crimes I commit scores of every day?
List one, just one racist crime I commit every day?
 
See how fast the Tea Bag Brotherhood abandons their losers!

BTW, your bullshit was already debunked earlier in this thread when another fool made the same false claim! Further proof the Right is incapable of learning even when exposed to the facts!

To refresh your memory:

Tea Party-backed Rep. Akin wins Missouri GOP Senate primary to take on McCaskill | Fox News

Tea Party-backed Rep. Akin wins Missouri GOP Senate primary to take on McCaskill

Score another win for the Tea Party.

Missouri Rep. Todd Akin broke out of a three-way GOP primary fight Tuesday and won the nomination to take on Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill in the fall. Akin had played up his Tea Party credentials, in an unusual primary race in which all three candidates claimed conservative, outsider appeal.

The results send yet another Tea Party-backed candidate into the general election, with the McCaskill face-off considered one of the most closely watched Senate races of the year.

Show me the Tea party statements supporting any social issue?
It's a single issue grass roots organization, you fucking retard.
Taxed Enough Already.
Consider your retarded self de bunked.
When I get the Right cursing me I know they believe deep down in their own hearts that I am right!

Akin was an original member of the Tea Bag Brotherhood caucus

https://www.stlbeacon.org/#!/content/24282/akin_tea_party_endorsement_041212

Touting tea party backing, Akin's endorsed by Bachmann and King

WASHINGTON – The struggle for tea party-related support among Missouri’s Republican Senate contenders continued Thursday as U.S. Rep. Todd Akin, R-Wildwood, announced the endorsement of former presidential hopeful and congressional Tea Party Caucus founder Michele Bachmann.

Akin’s corralling of U.S. Reps. Bachmann, R-Minn., and Steve King, R-Iowa – staunch conservatives who, along with Akin, were among the caucus’ founding members in 2010 – follows last month’s dispute over the significance of the Tea Party Express’ endorsement of GOP Senate contender and former state Treasurer Sarah Steelman.

Upset with that decision by the nation’s biggest tea party political action committee, 18 Missouri-based tea party groups issued a statement in March disavowing the endorsement, saying the California-based Tea Party Express does “not speak for Missouri tea party organizations when stating they have identified a 'true Tea Party candidate in Missouri.'” Two other tea party-aligned groups – the Missouri Conservative Coalition and the Gateway Grassroots Initiative – later issued similar statements.

The Gateway Grassroots Initiative, which includes activists who broke away from the St. Louis Tea Party, said in a statement that the Tea Party Express' support for Steelman “was done without consulting or reaching out to local groups to gauge whether or not their endorsement was a wise one.”

Whatever your party apparatchiks tell you.
You are wrong.
 
Did the fact that women do not have "a way of shutting that whole thing down" ring any alarms? What part of his reasoning was fundamentally sound BTW?

there are no alarms because, except his weird wording(shutting down the body for me is multiorgan failure, which might happen, but some other factors have to be involved) it is physiologically true - the high level of stress hormones prevent pregnancy occurring upon forcible rape.
It is a well and long known fact in OB/GYN.

I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.
 
How has this thread gone? It does not matter. I will kill it.

Sarah Palin
Christine O'Donnell
Todd Akin
Rand Paul
Any USMB Tea Party nutjob.

Finis.


Nancy Pelosi
Maxine Waters
Sheila Jackson Lee
Joe Biden
Charley Rangel
Any USMB Moonbat kook.

End thread..........
 
How has this thread gone? It does not matter. I will kill it.

Sarah Palin
Christine O'Donnell
Todd Akin
Rand Paul
Any USMB Tea Party nutjob.

Finis.


Nancy Pelosi
Maxine Waters
Sheila Jackson Lee
Joe Biden
Charley Rangel
Any USMB Moonbat kook.

End thread..........

you forgot the messiah who is useless without a teleprompter
 
there are no alarms because, except his weird wording(shutting down the body for me is multiorgan failure, which might happen, but some other factors have to be involved) it is physiologically true - the high level of stress hormones prevent pregnancy occurring upon forcible rape.
It is a well and long known fact in OB/GYN.

I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

How could you possibly know that without getting all rape victims to tell the truth? You do understand all that is needed is for the egg to merge with the sperm? That can happen no matter how violent the rape is. This is why people think the Tea Party is looney when they support candidates like Aikens.
 
I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

How could you possibly know that without getting all rape victims to tell the truth? You do understand all that is needed is for the egg to merge with the sperm? That can happen no matter how violent the rape is. This is why people think the Tea Party is looney when they support candidates like Aikens.

because I know some medical statistics :D
and as I have mentioned before high level of stress hormones might make implementation impossible.
egg meeting the sperm is not the end of the story ;)

and being ignorant like you are does not make you less looney on running with false LSM outrage.
 
Last edited:
there are no alarms because, except his weird wording(shutting down the body for me is multiorgan failure, which might happen, but some other factors have to be involved) it is physiologically true - the high level of stress hormones prevent pregnancy occurring upon forcible rape.
It is a well and long known fact in OB/GYN.

I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

Yeeeeeeehaw! Ya can't get pregnant if you are raped! And if you do get pregnant.....it was not rape! It must have been consensual!

Ladies...........how about that!
 
I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

Yeeeeeeehaw! Ya can't get pregnant if you are raped! And if you do get pregnant.....it was not rape! It must have been consensual!

Ladies...........how about that!

Did Sheila Jackson Lee, driving the Mars Rover with the spinning rims ever find that flag the astronauts planted on Mars?.......:cool:
 
I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

Yeeeeeeehaw! Ya can't get pregnant if you are raped! And if you do get pregnant.....it was not rape! It must have been consensual!

Ladies...........how about that!

I know you are an idiot and do not understand that "not in 100% cases" and "occurrence is miniscule" means exactly that pregnancy after violent rape is rare. and it translates in your leftard mind into "you can not get pregnant after a rape" - but then, that should be expected from a lying leftard :D
 
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

Yeeeeeeehaw! Ya can't get pregnant if you are raped! And if you do get pregnant.....it was not rape! It must have been consensual!

Ladies...........how about that!

Did Sheila Jackson Lee, driving the Mars Rover with the spinning rims ever find that flag the astronauts planted on Mars?.......:cool:

No.....no.....no.....not funny. You should apply for that writing gig at "The Five". You'll fit right in.
 
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

How could you possibly know that without getting all rape victims to tell the truth? You do understand all that is needed is for the egg to merge with the sperm? That can happen no matter how violent the rape is. This is why people think the Tea Party is looney when they support candidates like Aikens.

because I know some medical statistics :D
and as I have mentioned before high level of stress hormones might make implementation impossible.
egg meeting the sperm is not the end of the story ;)

Stats are not reliable unless you have all the variables covered. I know you know this. Its all guessing..not valid science. No one knows how stressed or not stressed and individual can be even if everyone reported a rape correctly.
 
I don't quite know what to say to that. I just want to make sure that I am clear on your stance. Are you saying that if a woman is forcibly raped she will not get pregnant?
not in 100% cases. but the occurrence of pregnancy after violent rape is miniscule.
but it has to be violent. the case - she agreed and then decided it was a rape - is not the one discussed here.

Yeeeeeeehaw! Ya can't get pregnant if you are raped! And if you do get pregnant.....it was not rape! It must have been consensual!

Ladies...........how about that!

Those dreaded, all variables covered stats evidently say you can. Now I see why the Tea Party is going to go down as one of the most destructive forces known to intelligence.
 
Show me the Tea party statements supporting any social issue?
It's a single issue grass roots organization, you fucking retard.
Taxed Enough Already.
Consider your retarded self de bunked.
When I get the Right cursing me I know they believe deep down in their own hearts that I am right!

Akin was an original member of the Tea Bag Brotherhood caucus

https://www.stlbeacon.org/#!/content/24282/akin_tea_party_endorsement_041212

Touting tea party backing, Akin's endorsed by Bachmann and King

WASHINGTON – The struggle for tea party-related support among Missouri’s Republican Senate contenders continued Thursday as U.S. Rep. Todd Akin, R-Wildwood, announced the endorsement of former presidential hopeful and congressional Tea Party Caucus founder Michele Bachmann.

Akin’s corralling of U.S. Reps. Bachmann, R-Minn., and Steve King, R-Iowa – staunch conservatives who, along with Akin, were among the caucus’ founding members in 2010 – follows last month’s dispute over the significance of the Tea Party Express’ endorsement of GOP Senate contender and former state Treasurer Sarah Steelman.

Upset with that decision by the nation’s biggest tea party political action committee, 18 Missouri-based tea party groups issued a statement in March disavowing the endorsement, saying the California-based Tea Party Express does “not speak for Missouri tea party organizations when stating they have identified a 'true Tea Party candidate in Missouri.'” Two other tea party-aligned groups – the Missouri Conservative Coalition and the Gateway Grassroots Initiative – later issued similar statements.

The Gateway Grassroots Initiative, which includes activists who broke away from the St. Louis Tea Party, said in a statement that the Tea Party Express' support for Steelman “was done without consulting or reaching out to local groups to gauge whether or not their endorsement was a wise one.”

Whatever your party apparatchiks tell you.
You are wrong.
Brilliant! And very scientific too. :cuckoo:

Like I said, the Right is incapable of learning even after being handed the facts on a silver platter.
 
How could you possibly know that without getting all rape victims to tell the truth? You do understand all that is needed is for the egg to merge with the sperm? That can happen no matter how violent the rape is. This is why people think the Tea Party is looney when they support candidates like Aikens.

because I know some medical statistics :D
and as I have mentioned before high level of stress hormones might make implementation impossible.
egg meeting the sperm is not the end of the story ;)

Stats are not reliable unless you have all the variables covered. I know you know this. Its all guessing..not valid science. No one knows how stressed or not stressed and individual can be even if everyone reported a rape correctly.

Variables ARE covered. I am talking about violent rape.

and it is a well known fact for all the reproduction specialists - if you are under stress - the implementation is highly questionable.

Now, I know your tendency to engage in a menace of splitting the hair into the 4 parts, so I won't go any further.

as i said - Akin is an idiot - for getting involved into a discussion which he should avoided.
But I am not ;)
 
because I know some medical statistics :D
and as I have mentioned before high level of stress hormones might make implementation impossible.
egg meeting the sperm is not the end of the story ;)

Stats are not reliable unless you have all the variables covered. I know you know this. Its all guessing..not valid science. No one knows how stressed or not stressed and individual can be even if everyone reported a rape correctly.

Variables ARE covered. I am talking about violent rape.

and it is a well known fact for all the reproduction specialists - if you are under stress - the implementation is highly questionable.

Now, I know your tendency to engage in a menace of splitting the hair into the 4 parts, so I won't go any further.

as i said - Akin is an idiot - for getting involved into a discussion which he should avoided.
But I am not ;)

Not everyone reports the variable of the rape being violent. How are you missing that? How are they measuring the levels of stress in the subjects and the levels of hormones and timing it to the moment of conception and attachment to the uterus? Are you really trying to say I'm splitting hairs? All you can say with any assurance is that it may be possible that stress may play a part in preventing pregnancy in violent rape cases. Thats about as useless as used toilet paper.
 
Stats are not reliable unless you have all the variables covered. I know you know this. Its all guessing..not valid science. No one knows how stressed or not stressed and individual can be even if everyone reported a rape correctly.

Variables ARE covered. I am talking about violent rape.

and it is a well known fact for all the reproduction specialists - if you are under stress - the implementation is highly questionable.

Now, I know your tendency to engage in a menace of splitting the hair into the 4 parts, so I won't go any further.

as i said - Akin is an idiot - for getting involved into a discussion which he should avoided.
But I am not ;)

Not everyone reports the variable of the rape being violent. How are you missing that? How are they measuring the levels of stress in the subjects and the levels of hormones and timing it to the moment of conception and attachment to the uterus? Are you really trying to say I'm splitting hairs? All you can say with any assurance is that it may be possible that stress may play a part in preventing pregnancy in violent rape cases. Thats about as useless as used toilet paper.
:lol:
google is your friend
 

Forum List

Back
Top