Talmudi Courts

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by rtwngAvngr, Jun 1, 2006.

  1. The ClayTaurus
    Offline

    The ClayTaurus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +333
    Your definition of "reason" is "agrees with RWA's viewpoint"
     
  2. The ClayTaurus
    Offline

    The ClayTaurus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +333
    Just being honest. The fact that I'm merely mocking his "sources" doesn't take away from the fact that others have attempted to actually engage him in debate.
     
  3. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    Not at all. Reason would be some proof that the talmudic endtimes model is not as I assert.
     
  4. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    And they we're roundly beaten, and then they screwed up all the discussions to hide their embarrassing defeat.
     
  5. The ClayTaurus
    Offline

    The ClayTaurus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +333
    Just out of curiousity, but when was the last time someone proved you wrong, in your opinion?

    You're delusional avenger persona is severely affecting your perceptions.
     
  6. The ClayTaurus
    Offline

    The ClayTaurus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +333
    Hardly. You flooded the thread and refused to read any criticisms.
     
  7. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    71,958
    Thanks Received:
    13,292
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +24,128
    Heh! He annoyed me. I forgot! lol...

    Laterz! :funnyface
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    What were the opposing arguments?
     
  9. The ClayTaurus
    Offline

    The ClayTaurus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +333
    That the EEEEEEEEEEEEEEvil conspiracy is all in your head. But anytime anyone suggested it you immediately went "oh so noachide laws don't exist?" I guess it's easy for you to win all your debates when you summarily misrepresent what people are saying. No one is disagreeing that noachide and whatever else exists. Its your pattern of connecting the dots everyone has a problem with.
     
  10. Nienna
    Offline

    Nienna Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,515
    Thanks Received:
    334
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +338
    I don't know much about the Noachide laws, but this is the gist of the covenant with Noah as described in Genesis:

    Never again would God destroy the entire earth with a flood.
    As long as the earth endures, the seasons and days will continue in naturall succession. This was a one-sided covenant, given by God to reward Noah's faithfulness.

    Other natural rules established at the time were: Animals would possess fear of mankind, mankind was now allowed to eat the animals as well as plants, people must not eat creatures which are still alive, and God reinforced the idea that murder is evil.

    God blessed the people and the animals with the ability to be "fruitful," to bear progeny enough to "fill the earth."

    Any law outside of these ideas should not be imputed to scripture, at least as it pertains to Noah.
     

Share This Page