Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump has been charged as Individual One in a criminal proceeding that will take place if he doesn't win next November. Does he deserve a pass on those charges or should he be required to divulge his financials?I would like every poster who feels it is imperative to see Trumps tax records to post theirs here. There is no legal requirement for you to do so you have done nothing illega
Michael Cohen: "Individual 1 is Donald J. Trump"
"When Michael Cohen pleaded guilty in November 2018 to lying to Congress, the documents filed with his plea deal didn’t explicitly name the person on whose behalf he had lied.
"It called him 'Individual 1.'"
"There was never any doubt that 'Individual 1' was President Donald Trump. But now, in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee Wednesday, Cohen has confirmed it.
"'I pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with ‘Individual 1,’” Cohen said, reading from his prepared statement. 'And for the record: ‘Individual 1’ is Donald J. Trump.'"
That IRS review consisted of little more than certifying Trump filed his returns.Now let's look at the real world.
Trump has filed tax returns, they have been reviewed by the IRS.
No one has shown that he has illegal income that he could be hit with tax evasion.
Compare that limited audit to the one congress and the Manhattan DA would pursue.
If Trump has nothing to hide, he would have already revealed these returns and relevant documents.
When Congresscritters continually enter office moderately well off and leave office even just a few years later obscenely wealthy, something is going on.Obama had everything put under seal in Hawaii......so that's all that can be said about that.
US Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump's tax returns
The Supreme Court will rule on the president's attempts to keep his financial records secret.www.yahoo.com
From the link:
The US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether President Donald Trump should be allowed to keep his financial records secret, in a major showdown over presidential powers.
Mr Trump declines to share documents that could shed light on his fortune and the work of his family company.
Two congressional committees and New York prosecutors demand the release of his tax returns and other information.
Mr Trump's private lawyers argue he enjoys total immunity while in office.
The judges will hear the cases remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court has a 5-4 conservative majority and includes two Trump appointees - Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The rule of law, and a guiding principle in our nation's jurisprudence is no man is above the law. The efficacy of the Supreme Court justices to dispense justice will be judged in this matter. If they decide in favor of President Trump, it will give carte blanche to him, and to every future POTUS.
Trump should be treated the same.
I think what we should do is open up the tax records and all of the financial records of House Democrats and see where they're getting paid and by whom.
The US economy functions under principles of state capitalism.So we can say either he didn't do exactly what you think or he was a lot smarter then federal and state employees. I guess we could also make a case for all federal and state employees being able to be bought.
There is no Constitutional requirement of the disclosure of any financial , health or other personal documents for the eligibility to hold the office of PresidentUS Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump's tax returns
The Supreme Court will rule on the president's attempts to keep his financial records secret.
From the link:
The US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether President Donald Trump should be allowed to keep his financial records secret, in a major showdown over presidential powers.
Mr Trump declines to share documents that could shed light on his fortune and the work of his family company.
Two congressional committees and New York prosecutors demand the release of his tax returns and other information.
Mr Trump's private lawyers argue he enjoys total immunity while in office.
The judges will hear the cases remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court has a 5-4 conservative majority and includes two Trump appointees - Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The rule of law, and a guiding principle in our nation's jurisprudence is no man is above the law. The efficacy of the Supreme Court justices to dispense justice will be judged in this matter. If they decide in favor of President Trump, it will give carte blanche to him, and to every future POTUS.
There is no Constitutional requirement of the disclosure of any financial , health or other personal documents for the eligibility to hold the office of PresidentUS Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump's tax returns
The Supreme Court will rule on the president's attempts to keep his financial records secret.
From the link:
The US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether President Donald Trump should be allowed to keep his financial records secret, in a major showdown over presidential powers.
Mr Trump declines to share documents that could shed light on his fortune and the work of his family company.
Two congressional committees and New York prosecutors demand the release of his tax returns and other information.
Mr Trump's private lawyers argue he enjoys total immunity while in office.
The judges will hear the cases remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court has a 5-4 conservative majority and includes two Trump appointees - Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The rule of law, and a guiding principle in our nation's jurisprudence is no man is above the law. The efficacy of the Supreme Court justices to dispense justice will be judged in this matter. If they decide in favor of President Trump, it will give carte blanche to him, and to every future POTUS.
There is no Constitutional requirement of the disclosure of any financial , health or other personal documents for the eligibility to hold the office of PresidentUS Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump's tax returns
The Supreme Court will rule on the president's attempts to keep his financial records secret.
From the link:
The US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether President Donald Trump should be allowed to keep his financial records secret, in a major showdown over presidential powers.
Mr Trump declines to share documents that could shed light on his fortune and the work of his family company.
Two congressional committees and New York prosecutors demand the release of his tax returns and other information.
Mr Trump's private lawyers argue he enjoys total immunity while in office.
The judges will hear the cases remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court has a 5-4 conservative majority and includes two Trump appointees - Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The rule of law, and a guiding principle in our nation's jurisprudence is no man is above the law. The efficacy of the Supreme Court justices to dispense justice will be judged in this matter. If they decide in favor of President Trump, it will give carte blanche to him, and to every future POTUS.
There is no real reason to see any of Trump's records. He isn't accused of any wrongdoing.
IDIOT-GRAM ^^^; Variety, foolish rationalization.
Explanation: if he has done nothing wrong, he would have fulfilled his promise to release these documents.
Nope that's not how the right to privacy works. It's too easy to use that for any excuse to pry into a person's privacy..... a false Dichotomy.... " If you have nothing to hide "..... total bullshit.
JO
Congressional Democrats AND Republicans serve the same ten percent of US voters, namely the so-called "investor class" or richest 10%.Uhhhh, you just said that they bribe CONGRESS, not the IRS. That's not chipping away at the IRS. Sounds like the real problem is those who enter Congress moderately well off and leave extremely wealthy. You know, like democrats do
Trump has been charged as Individual One in a criminal proceeding that will take place if he doesn't win next November. Does he deserve a pass on those charges or should he be required to divulge his financials?I would like every poster who feels it is imperative to see Trumps tax records to post theirs here. There is no legal requirement for you to do so you have done nothing illega
Michael Cohen: "Individual 1 is Donald J. Trump"
"When Michael Cohen pleaded guilty in November 2018 to lying to Congress, the documents filed with his plea deal didn’t explicitly name the person on whose behalf he had lied.
"It called him 'Individual 1.'"
"There was never any doubt that 'Individual 1' was President Donald Trump. But now, in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee Wednesday, Cohen has confirmed it.
"'I pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with ‘Individual 1,’” Cohen said, reading from his prepared statement. 'And for the record: ‘Individual 1’ is Donald J. Trump.'"
Incorrect -
Mueller confirmed that the fact that he was currently President was not the reason that he was not subject to indictment.
Cohen pleaded guilty to non Trump related crimes and was sent to jail.
He pleaded guilty to the campaign finance violation in an attempt to lesson his jail time.
So since all those other things violate the Constitution what's one more right?There is no Constitutional requirement of the disclosure of any financial , health or other personal documents for the eligibility to hold the office of PresidentUS Supreme Court hears arguments over Trump's tax returns
The Supreme Court will rule on the president's attempts to keep his financial records secret.
From the link:
The US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether President Donald Trump should be allowed to keep his financial records secret, in a major showdown over presidential powers.
Mr Trump declines to share documents that could shed light on his fortune and the work of his family company.
Two congressional committees and New York prosecutors demand the release of his tax returns and other information.
Mr Trump's private lawyers argue he enjoys total immunity while in office.
The judges will hear the cases remotely because of the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court has a 5-4 conservative majority and includes two Trump appointees - Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
The rule of law, and a guiding principle in our nation's jurisprudence is no man is above the law. The efficacy of the Supreme Court justices to dispense justice will be judged in this matter. If they decide in favor of President Trump, it will give carte blanche to him, and to every future POTUS.
There is no Constitutional power in Art. II giving POTUS the power of an Executive Order. There is no Constitutional requirement that anyone provide identification to vote. There is no .... to draft men into the Military Service...got it
Trump has a long timeline of tax fraud.You know, most innocent people want the truth to come out, while most guilty people do whatever they can to keep the truth from coming to light. it couldn't be much simpler than that.
Trump has a long timeline of tax fraud.You know, most innocent people want the truth to come out, while most guilty people do whatever they can to keep the truth from coming to light. it couldn't be much simpler than that.
It's hard to believe they were ignored during the 2016 campaign.
Tax Fraud By The Numbers: The Trump Timeline [UPDATED 2020]
Mueller confirmed that the fact that he was currently President was not the reason that he was not subject to indictment.
Cohen pleaded guilty to non Trump related crimes and was sent to jail.
He pleaded guilty to the campaign finance violation in an attempt to lesson his jail time.
Then we both agree that Congress is deliberately making the tax code so complex that it becomes easy for them to use the IRS as a political weapon. They can in essence use the IRS to go after political opponents while ignoring political allies. I identify the problem not as rich families trying to weaken the IRS, but as Congresscritters using its power to further their own goals instead of allowing it to operate independently. And yes, we could almost completely do away with the IRS if we had tax returns simple enough to put on a post card.Congressional Democrats AND Republicans serve the same ten percent of US voters, namely the so-called "investor class" or richest 10%.Uhhhh, you just said that they bribe CONGRESS, not the IRS. That's not chipping away at the IRS. Sounds like the real problem is those who enter Congress moderately well off and leave extremely wealthy. You know, like democrats do
Congress has simultaneously increased the complexity of the US tax code while shrinking the IRS's enforcement capability; instead of concentrating pressure on billionaires who don't pay their fair share, the IRS used its limited budget to investigate working class taxpayers who had no access to legal and financial professionals advice.
We need tax police – and they should go after the likes of Donald Trump | David Cay Johnston
"Congress, which makes tax law, has never properly supported the IRS, which I like calling the Tax Police Department.
"Since 1992, the American population has grown 27% but the IRS staff has shrunk by 34%, to less than 78,000 people.
"At the same time, Congress has added enormous complexity to the tax code."
Does Mable have any evidence Trump has ever committed tax fraud?Yeah that is exactly what an IRS review is -
Hey Mabel did that Trump guy file a return?
What "non Trump related crimes" did Cohen plead guilty to?Cohen pleaded guilty to non Trump related crimes and was sent to jail.
