Sucking A Prick Is A Right

"Sucking A Prick Is A Right"

I think you're mistaken. Unless it's own's prick that is being sucked, that 'right' is fully dependent on finding a willing prick to suck. That willingness can be withdrawn at any time, for any reason, putting it fully in the category of privilege versus a right.
 
Sure is....
To Matthew: Get real. First it was “Keep the government out of our bedrooms.” Apparently, decriminalizing homosexuality was not good enough. Now they want that same government to make it a Right.
I think you're mistaken.
To fncceo: My thread title is tongue in cheek.
putting it fully in the category of privilege versus a right.
To fncceo: Liberals call every privilege a Right.
 
Would you want someone telling your lady what she can do in the bedroom?
To NoNukes: This thread is about freedom of religion and the homosexual agenda based on the article I linked in the OP. Note the headline:
UN Gay Rights Envoy: Religious Freedom ‘Not an Absolute Right’
Religious freedom isn't absolute, take sharia law for example, it's not allowed in the US despite having freedom of religion in the Constitution. Being gay isn't a right, it's a condition people can't help being, like being an idiot, like you are.
 
Religious freedom isn't absolute, take sharia law for example, it's not allowed in the US despite having freedom of religion in the Constitution.
To Mudda: Asshole:

After more than seven years in the White House the Chicago sewer rat can be thanked for proving that Islam is a political movement:​

Obama 'engagement' policy 'enabled Boston, San Bernardino attacks'
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 05/29/2016 @ 1:54 pm

Obama ‘engagement’ policy ‘enabled Boston, San Bernardino attacks’

The liar had to kill Americans to inadvertently prove that Islam is not a religion. Will the Congress or the Supreme Court ever codify a fact that Americans with a lick of sense have known all along? I doubt it. I can answer NO if a Democrat wins the general election. A double-NO if either Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden become president.

A Rodent Proves The Obvious
Being gay isn't a right, it's a condition people can't help being,
To Mudda: Whether it is a condition, a choice, or a Right, homosexuality has nothing to do with freedom of religion within the context of this thread.
 
Religious freedom isn't absolute, take sharia law for example, it's not allowed in the US despite having freedom of religion in the Constitution.
To Mudda: Asshole:

After more than seven years in the White House the Chicago sewer rat can be thanked for proving that Islam is a political movement:​

Obama 'engagement' policy 'enabled Boston, San Bernardino attacks'
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 05/29/2016 @ 1:54 pm

Obama ‘engagement’ policy ‘enabled Boston, San Bernardino attacks’

The liar had to kill Americans to inadvertently prove that Islam is not a religion. Will the Congress or the Supreme Court ever codify a fact that Americans with a lick of sense have known all along? I doubt it. I can answer NO if a Democrat wins the general election. A double-NO if either Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden become president.

A Rodent Proves The Obvious
Being gay isn't a right, it's a condition people can't help being,
To Mudda: Whether it is a condition, a choice, or a Right, homosexuality has nothing to do with freedom of religion within the context of this thread.
Just because you're confused doesn't make Islam anything more than a religion. And religions don't have absolute freedom in western societies. That a gay person says these things makes no difference whatsoever. But you do seem homophobic, why is that?
 
Just because you're confused doesn't make Islam anything more than a religion.
To Mudda: Alas, I always have to spell it out for assholes:

Challenge Muslims on their respect for the First Amendment, and they will come out of the woodwork swearing they will defend the U.S. Constitution to the death —— not for everyone but for themselves so long as Islam is considered a religion instead of a political movement. I am not talking about Muslim Imams only. Every Muslim will retreat behind Taqiyya and Kitman when asked. You will not see that in other religion because no other religion’s ideology approves of lying; whereas, Islam demands it in order to defeat enemies from within.

Back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy does not protect them from touchy-feely non-Muslim fools who willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

NOTE: Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

The First Lie President Obama Told
 
Just because you're confused doesn't make Islam anything more than a religion.
To Mudda: Alas, I always have to spell it out for assholes:

Challenge Muslims on their respect for the First Amendment, and they will come out of the woodwork swearing they will defend the U.S. Constitution to the death —— not for everyone but for themselves so long as Islam is considered a religion instead of a political movement. I am not talking about Muslim Imams only. Every Muslim will retreat behind Taqiyya and Kitman when asked. You will not see that in other religion because no other religion’s ideology approves of lying; whereas, Islam demands it in order to defeat enemies from within.

Back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy does not protect them from touchy-feely non-Muslim fools who willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

NOTE: Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

The First Lie President Obama Told
You haven't shown anything that would suggest that Islam is not a religion.
 
You haven't shown anything that would suggest that Islam is not a religion.
To Mudda: Will this make you happy?

ISLAM IS A RELIGION IN EVERY COUNTRY EXCEPT THE UNITED STATES.

Now ask me why? The answer is:

The U.S. Constitution makes it impossible for freedom-loving Americans to believe in the Constitution and a theocracy. The U.S. Constitution makes it impossible for Muslims to believe in the Constitution.
 
You haven't shown anything that would suggest that Islam is not a religion.
To Mudda: Will this make you happy?

ISLAM IS A RELIGION IN EVERY COUNTRY EXCEPT THE UNITED STATES.

Now ask me why? The answer is:

The U.S. Constitution makes it impossible for freedom-loving Americans to believe in the Constitution and a theocracy. The U.S. Constitution makes it impossible for Muslims to believe in the Constitution.
The constitution doesn't forbid Islam, please try again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top