Stunning admission from Rep. Jordan, that the Hunter Biden laptop investigation is about putting Trump back in office

8 year olds are given drugs, without their parents knowledge. By the teachers, so fuck you and all the other people who support it. California is a sanctuary state for this crap.

Nobody is giving anyone drugs at the age of eight. Why would people need hormone suppressing drugs when they don’t have hormones until they’re teenagers?????
 
Nobody is giving anyone drugs at the age of eight. Why would people need hormone suppressing drugs when they don’t have hormones until they’re teenagers?????
Puberty blockers are given to prepubescent children. Do you approve of that too?
 
Nobody is giving anyone drugs at the age of eight. Why would people need hormone suppressing drugs when they don’t have hormones until they’re teenagers?????
They cut a thirteen years old breast off and gave her hormone drugs. She is nineteen now and is suing the doctors for it. She is also sterile because of it. So fuck you, you sick people are doing this to our kids.
 
1. Abortion is NOT in the US Constitution. So pass a LAW that regulates it and stop whining. As it is now the STATES regulate abortions. Perfectlly per the US Constitution.
It was precedent for 50 years. That republicans repealed will result in Republicans losing at the ballot box.

the 9th amendment explains that we have many rights not enumerated in the Constitution, so that fact that it is not there is not an argument.
2. "No democrat you know"????? How fucking stupid is that? The LAWS in those 8-states allow late term abortions. By voting democrat you enable baby butchering. Simple Fact.
How many EU countries or Britain allow late term abortions?
Name one democrat that approves of a late term abortion that is not done to save the mother's life.

Otherwise, you are lying.
3. Only the able-bodied between 18-55 with no dependents would be required to work.
No one that is able bodied between those ages can qualify for welfare in most states and circumstances.
4. You can't defend the FACT that there is a difference between Bigotry and Morality.
No, I raised no point that required it. My only point is that YOU are a bigot, and your bigotry is immoral.
One of the differences is the difference between deviant sexual behavior and normal sexual behavior.
Another difference are the religious beliefs of many religions that teach immorality is wrong.
Concerned parents do not want the public schools pushing immorality on their children.
You can call me a bigot for defending morality. I wear that badge with honor. How do you like your badge "Deviant & Baby Killer"?

No, your premise that homosexuality is immoral and therefore deviant is false, it is not based on reality, which is to say, modern psychology, sociology, anthropology, and psychiatry and the soft sciences, and, your opinion flows from the wellspring of general bigotry, which makes you a bigot.

For your edification, my research reveals the following:

The understanding and acceptance of homosexuality within the fields of psychology, sociology, anthropology, and psychiatry have indeed evolved significantly over the years. In the past, prevailing cultural and societal norms often led to the classification of homosexuality as deviant or mentally pathological. However, as research and understanding progressed, a more comprehensive and inclusive perspective emerged, recognizing homosexuality as a natural and normal variation of human sexuality. Let's explore the evolution within each field:

Psychology: In the past, psychology classified homosexuality as a mental disorder. This perspective began to change in the 1970s when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The shift was supported by research demonstrating that homosexuality does not inherently lead to psychological dysfunction. Today, mainstream psychology acknowledges homosexuality as a normal and valid expression of human sexuality.

Sociology: Sociological perspectives have contributed to understanding homosexuality as a social construct influenced by cultural, historical, and societal factors. Sociologists have examined how social norms, power dynamics, and institutions shape attitudes towards homosexuality. As societal attitudes evolved, sociology played a crucial role in challenging stigmatization and promoting acceptance of diverse sexual orientations.

Anthropology: Anthropological studies have demonstrated that same-sex attraction and relationships have been present in various cultures throughout history. Anthropologists have documented diverse cultural understandings of gender and sexuality, challenging the notion that heterosexuality is the only "natural" or "normal" orientation. By highlighting cultural relativity, anthropology has contributed to the understanding of homosexuality as a valid expression of human diversity.

Psychiatry: Psychiatry has also progressed in its understanding of homosexuality. With the removal of homosexuality from the DSM, psychiatry recognized the importance of destigmatizing same-sex attraction. Mental health professionals have played a role in challenging conversion therapies and promoting affirmative and supportive approaches to LGBTQ+ individuals.

These fields have embraced evidence-based research, critical thinking, and a commitment to inclusivity, leading to a shift in perspective from pathologizing homosexuality to affirming it as a normal and natural variation of human sexuality. However, it's important to note that discrimination, stigma, and societal challenges still persist for LGBTQ+ individuals in many contexts, and ongoing efforts are needed to promote equality and acceptance.

Not all religious groups uphold homosexuality as 'deviant', to wit:

Over the years, several religious groups and denominations have become more accepting of homosexuality and have taken steps to affirm and include LGBTQ+ individuals within their communities. It's important to note that religious beliefs and interpretations can vary within different denominations and even among individual members. Here are a few examples of religious groups that have become more accepting:

  1. Reform Judaism: The Reform Jewish movement has been at the forefront of LGBTQ+ inclusion. The Central Conference of American Rabbis, the principal organization of Reform rabbis, passed a resolution in 1990 affirming the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, and many Reform synagogues perform same-sex marriages and ordain openly LGBTQ+ clergy.
  2. Unitarian Universalist Association: Unitarian Universalism is a religious denomination that embraces a wide range of theological beliefs and encourages acceptance and inclusion. The UUA has a long history of supporting LGBTQ+ rights and performing same-sex marriages.
  3. Episcopal Church: The Episcopal Church in the United States has made significant strides towards LGBTQ+ inclusion. In 2003, the church ordained its first openly gay bishop, and in 2015, it voted to allow same-sex marriages to be performed in its churches.
  4. Metropolitan Community Church: The Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) is a denomination founded specifically to serve LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies. The MCC affirms the worth and spirituality of all people, including LGBTQ+ individuals, and conducts same-sex marriages.
  5. United Church of Christ: The United Church of Christ has been a progressive Christian denomination, openly affirming LGBTQ+ inclusion. The church has advocated for LGBTQ+ rights and has supported same-sex marriage ceremonies.
  6. Quakers (Religious Society of Friends): Some Quaker meetings have become more accepting and affirming of LGBTQ+ individuals. Quaker beliefs emphasize equality, integrity, and respect for all people, which has led to a more inclusive stance on homosexuality in some Quaker communities.

In my view, the ONLY reason to uphold homosexuaity as 'deviant' is bigotry, where, when 'religion' is cited, it is merely using the Bible to rationalize one's bigotry, given that one MUST cherry pick the Bible in order to use the Bible as the basis for one's belief.

It is the reason that one MUST cherry pick the Bible that doing so is bigotry. Clearly, you do not believe in stoning prostitutes? So, if you are honest say your religion is the basis for your believe against Homosexuality, why aren't you supporting stoning prostitutes? Therefore, ' cherry picking' PROVES you are a bigot.

Please understand that ALL bigots are DESPICABLE ASSHOLES, so when you wear that badge, don't forget to include this bit of information on that badge
 
No one is influencing eight year olds to change their gender. You spent too much time watching TikTok.

Millions of lives are being ruined? Given that there are only 1.6 million transgender people of all ages, in all of the United States, it’s hard to imagine that “millions of lives” are being ruined.
Evil forces are trying to influence children into changing their gender. It is a sick, twisted agenda and if you agree with it then you are scum.

The filth that are promoting child transgendering are evil. Period. It is being stopped in Florida and other states

These aberrations will end once Donald Trump wins in November, 2024.

MAGA
 
Evil forces are trying to influence children into changing their gender. It is a sick, twisted agenda and if you agree with it then you are scum.

The filth that are promoting child transgendering are evil. Period. It is being stopped in Florida and other states

These aberrations will end once Donald Trump wins in November, 2024.

MAGA

No they are not. You're deranged.
 
It was precedent for 50 years. That republicans repealed will result in Republicans losing at the ballot box. the 9th amendment explains that we have many rights not enumerated in the Constitution, so that fact that it is not there is not an argument.

Name one democrat that approves of a late term abortion that is not done to save the mother's life. Otherwise, you are lying.

No one that is able bodied between those ages can qualify for welfare in most states and circumstances.

No, I raised no point that required it. My only point is that YOU are a bigot, and your bigotry is immoral.

No, your premise that homosexuality is immoral and therefore deviant is false, it is not based on reality, which is to say, modern psychology, sociology, anthropology, and psychiatry and the soft sciences, and, your opinion flows from the wellspring of general bigotry, which makes you a bigot.

For your edification, my research reveals the following:

The understanding and acceptance of homosexuality within the fields of psychology, sociology, anthropology, and psychiatry have indeed evolved significantly over the years. In the past, prevailing cultural and societal norms often led to the classification of homosexuality as deviant or mentally pathological. However, as research and understanding progressed, a more comprehensive and inclusive perspective emerged, recognizing homosexuality as a natural and normal variation of human sexuality. Let's explore the evolution within each field:

These fields have embraced evidence-based research, critical thinking, and a commitment to inclusivity, leading to a shift in perspective from pathologizing homosexuality to affirming it as a normal and natural variation of human sexuality. However, it's important to note that discrimination, stigma, and societal challenges still persist for LGBTQ+ individuals in many contexts, and ongoing efforts are needed to promote equality and acceptance.

Not all religious groups uphold homosexuality as 'deviant', to wit:
Over the years, several religious groups and denominations have become more accepting of homosexuality and have taken steps to affirm and include LGBTQ+ individuals within their communities. It's important to note that religious beliefs and interpretations can vary within different denominations and even among individual members. Here are a few examples of religious groups that have become more accepting:
In my view, the ONLY reason to uphold homosexuality as 'deviant' is bigotry, where, when 'religion' is cited, it is merely using the Bible to rationalize one's bigotry, given that one MUST cherry pick the Bible in order to use the Bible as the basis for one's belief. It is the reason that one MUST cherry pick the Bible that doing so is bigotry. Clearly, you do not believe in stoning prostitutes? So, if you are honest say your religion is the basis for your believe against Homosexuality, why aren't you supporting stoning prostitutes? Therefore, ' cherry picking' PROVES you are a bigot.

Please understand that ALL bigots are DESPICABLE ASSHOLES, so when you wear that badge, don't forget to include this bit of information on that badge
1. The USSC corrected RvW to be a state responsibility. The viable baby has a "right" to "LIFE, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". If Republicans lose at the ballot box, we can all watch the moron democrats ruin the country. Only the USSC can interpret the US Constitution, so your 9th Amendment argument is bullshit.

2. The FACT that 8 democrat states ALLOW late-term and partial-birth abortions proves that democrats are heartless animals....and NO, it does not need to be ONLY to save the life of the mother. If you read the links there are NO RESTRICTIONS.

3. If no one between 18-55 that is able bodied can qualify for welfare, then there is no issue.

4. There is a difference between Bigotry and Morality. No wonder you tried to avoid it.
MORALITY:
  1. The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.
  2. A system or collection of ideas of right and wrong conduct.
  3. Virtuous conduct.
BIGOTRY:
The character or mode of thought of a bigot; obstinate and unreasonable attachment to a particular creed, opinion, practice, ritual, or party organization; excessive zeal or warmth in favor of a party, sect, or opinion; intolerance of the opinions of others.

Your term "bigot" does not apply to people who reasonably believe that THEIR CHILDREN should not be exposed to homosexual practices or that homosexuality is amoral. Comparing homosexuality to people that eat shit, its a disgusting practice that has adverse health consequences. Parents have a right to protect their children from disgusting and deviant practices.

5. OK, "Modern" religions and soft-sciences are trying to "normalize" deviant behaviors. So all the old books need to be burned? Parents know right from wrong even if the teachers don't. We'll keep our old books and you SHIT EATERS can eat shit whenever you like, just keep your deviant behaviors away from our kids.
 
1. The USSC corrected RvW to be a state responsibility.
And Republicans will pay at the ballot box for defying 50 years of precedent and several justices rulings over that period.
The viable baby has a "right" to "LIFE, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". If Republicans lose at the ballot box, we can all watch the moron democrats ruin the country. Only the USSC can interpret the US Constitution, so your 9th Amendment argument is bullshit.
The issue of a fetus's 'rights' can only be decided by court decree, and the SC has kicked the can to the states. Your opinion is irrelevant.
2. The FACT that 8 democrat states ALLOW late-term and partial-birth abortions proves that democrats are heartless animals....and NO, it does not need to be ONLY to save the life of the mother. If you read the links there are NO RESTRICTIONS.
Like I said, name one democrat that supports late term abortions where the mom's life is in danger.

It may be that those laws were enacted to CHALLENGE the process to take it back to the SC since it has decided it will not take part in it anymore It does NOT prove what you are implying.

What would prove your point is if you can name one preferable more than one prominent democrat who supports late term abortions without the mother's life in danger.

But, you can't, because that democrat does NOT exist.
3. If no one between 18-55 that is able bodied can qualify for welfare, then there is no issue.
Correct, so I have no idea what you are ranting about. I've been wondering for some time now.
4. There is a difference between Bigotry and Morality. No wonder you tried to avoid it.
MORALITY:
  1. The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.
  2. A system or collection of ideas of right and wrong conduct.
  3. Virtuous conduct.
Your claiming that homosexuality as 'deviant' and 'immoral' is bigotry.

I believe that as strongly as you believe it isn't. I have good reasons
for believing it, which I already stated.

BIGOTRY:
The character or mode of thought of a bigot; obstinate and unreasonable attachment to a particular creed, opinion, practice, ritual, or party organization; excessive zeal or warmth in favor of a party, sect, or opinion; intolerance of the opinions of others.

Your term "bigot" does not apply to people who reasonably believe that THEIR CHILDREN should not be exposed to homosexual practices or that homosexuality is amoral. Comparing homosexuality to people that eat shit, its a disgusting practice that has adverse health consequences. Parents have a right to protect their children from disgusting and deviant practices.

5. OK, "Modern" religions and soft-sciences are trying to "normalize" deviant behaviors. So all the old books need to be burned? Parents know right from wrong even if the teachers don't. We'll keep our old books and you SHIT EATERS can eat shit whenever you like, just keep your deviant behaviors away from our kids.

No,

Your statement in #5 is proof of your bigotry. Only a bigot would use logic and language like that. It is that language, attitude bigots use to marginalize a group of people who are different. That is the essence of bigotry, "intolerance". If you were tolerant of homosexuals and treated them as your equal, you would not harbor such bigotry.

There is NOTHING reasonable for your belief. Maybe in the 50s, but no longer, as I have provided extensive evidence for that contention. Your reasoning, language, attitude is PURE bigotry. Just because there are a lot of bigots in the world doesn't mean it's right.
 
Last edited:
And Republicans will pay at the ballot box for defying 50 years of precedent and several justices rulings over that period.

The issue of a fetus's 'rights' can only be decided by court decree, and the SC has kicked the can to the states. Your opinion is irrelevant.

Like I said, name one democrat that supports late term abortions where the mom's life is in danger. It may be that those laws were enacted to CHALLENGE the process to take it back to the SC since it has decided it will not take part in it anymore It does NOT prove what you are implying. What would prove your point is if you can name one preferable more than one prominent democrat who supports late term abortions without the mother's life in danger. But, you can't, because that democrat does NOT exist.

Correct, so I have no idea what you are ranting about. I've been wondering for some time now.

Your claiming that homosexuality as 'deviant' and 'immoral' is bigotry. I believe that as strongly as you believe it isn't. I have good reasons for believing it, which I already stated.

No, Your statement in #5 is proof of your bigotry. Only a bigot would use logic and language like that. It is that language, attitude bigots use to marginalize a group of people who are different. That is the essence of bigotry, "intolerance". If you were tolerant of homosexuals and treated them as your equal, you would not harbor such bigotry.

There is NOTHING reasonable for your belief. Maybe in the 50s, but no longer, as I have provided extensive evidence for that contention. Your reasoning, language, attitude is PURE bigotry. Just because there are a lot of bigots in the world doesn't mean it's right.
1. Your whining about abortions is irrelevant, the USSC already said the states regulate abortion. That's how it will stay for the foreseeable future.
2. I'm not "implying" anything. I proved that 8 democrat states barbarically have no limits on abortion. End of discussion.
3. done
4. Homosexuality is "deviant" and immoral, always has been. Read books on it, here's a 12th Edition, free download. There are many books about deviant behaviors.

5. My language and logic are necessarily harsh because we're fighting about exposing our children to deviant behaviors or not. Gays don't have children, so to expand their numbers they try to entice our children into that deviant lifestyle. Children need parental guidance not deviant guidance.

Your term "bigot" does not apply to people who reasonably believe that THEIR CHILDREN should not be exposed to homosexual practices or that homosexuality is amoral. Comparing homosexuality to people that eat shit, its a disgusting practice that has adverse health consequences. Parents have a right to protect their children from disgusting and deviant practices.

"Modern" religions and soft-sciences are trying to "normalize" deviant behaviors. So all the old books need to be burned? Parents know right from wrong even if the teachers don't. We'll keep our old books and you SHIT EATERS can eat shit whenever you like, just keep your deviant behaviors away from our kids.

6. A few new questions:
a. do you believe in God?
b. do you believe that there is a heaven or a hell?
c. do you believe that there are demons or lost souls?

If you have the nerve, hit the nail on the head. Communicate with the spirits and ask them for their opinions.
 
Last edited:
1. Your whining about abortions is irrelevant,
Whining? Nope, just stating a fact. You need to look up the word 'whining'.
the USSC already said the states regulate abortion. That's how it will stay for the foreseeable future.
The kicked the can to the states, so many states are now banning abortion. Y'all gonna pay at the ballot box.
2. I'm not "implying" anything. I proved that 8 democrat states barbarically have no limits on abortion. End of discussion.
Oh please. Of coruse you are implying everything. You keep harping on it because you want people to believe democrats approve of late term abortions without good reason. Since you can't name one democrat that does, you're full of shit.
3. done
4. Homosexuality is "deviant" and immoral, always has been. Read books on it, here's a 12th Edition, free download. There are many books about deviant behaviors.
Clearly the position, belief, opinion, sentiment, etc, of a bigot.
5. My language and logic are necessarily harsh because we're fighting about exposing our children to deviant behaviors or not. Gays don't have children, so to expand their numbers they try to entice our children into that deviant lifestyle. Children need parental guidance not deviant guidance.
Such as the bigot's thinking goes.
Your term "bigot" does not apply to people who reasonably believe that THEIR CHILDREN should not be exposed to homosexual practices or that homosexuality is amoral. Comparing homosexuality to people that eat shit, its a disgusting practice that has adverse health consequences. Parents have a right to protect their children from disgusting and deviant practices.
What are you talking about? You are accusing all gays of fetish sex? What, because you saw ass licking on a porno site? Then accuse all heteros, as well, they do it, too. I spent many years living in West Hollywood, and have known many gays. I never met anyone that liked that sort of thing. I lived there because of the arts, I worked in the arts for years before retiring and West Hollywood was an epicenter for the arts, photography, music, theatrical workshops, playwriting, that sort of thing, and naturally hollywood has a lot of gay people who work in theatre and the arts in general, the vast majority of people of any stripe do not engage in fetish sex. You're talking nonsense.
"Modern" religions and soft-sciences are trying to "normalize" deviant behaviors.
Such is the position of a bigot.
So all the old books need to be burned? Parents know right from wrong even if the teachers don't. We'll keep our old books and you SHIT EATERS can eat shit whenever you like, just keep your deviant behaviors away from our kids.

No one is exposing children to deviant behavior. You are deluded.
6. A few new questions:
a. do you believe in God?
I'm a pantheist....of sorts. My spiritual philosophy is stated on another forum:
b. do you believe that there is a heaven or a hell?
I believe in the eventual spiritual fruition of all souls, (aka 'enlightenment' ) which are eternal.
Hell? We're in it. Life is hell and their is no way to go but up from here. There is no 'hell' in the 'dante' sense.
c. do you believe that there are demons or lost souls?
There are disembodied souls, but they eventually reincarnate and continue onward towards enlightenment.
If you have the nerve, hit the nail on the head. Communicate with the spirits and ask them for their opinions.

Not my thing.
 
Whining? Nope, just stating a fact. You need to look up the word 'whining'. They kicked the can to the states, so many states are now banning abortion. Y'all gonna pay at the ballot box.

Oh please. Of course you are implying everything. You keep harping on it because you want people to believe democrats approve of late term abortions without good reason. Since you can't name one democrat that does, you're full of shit.

Clearly the position, belief, opinion, sentiment, etc, of a bigot.

Such as the bigot's thinking goes.

What are you talking about? You are accusing all gays of fetish sex? What, because you saw ass licking on a porno site? Then accuse all heteros, as well, they do it, too. I spent many years living in West Hollywood, and have known many gays. I never met anyone that liked that sort of thing. I lived there because of the arts, I worked in the arts for years before retiring and West Hollywood was an epicenter for the arts, photography, music, theatrical workshops, playwriting, that sort of thing, and naturally hollywood has a lot of gay people who work in theatre and the arts in general, the vast majority of people of any stripe do not engage in fetish sex. You're talking nonsense.

Such is the position of a bigot.


No one is exposing children to deviant behavior. You are deluded.

I'm a pantheist....of sorts. My spiritual philosophy is stated on another forum:

I believe in the eventual spiritual fruition of all souls, (aka 'enlightenment' ) which are eternal.
Hell? We're in it. Life is hell and their is no way to go but up from here. There is no 'hell' in the 'dante' sense.
There are disembodied souls, but they eventually reincarnate and continue onward towards enlightenment.

Not my thing.
1. Being from Britain you wouldn't understand "states rights" per the US Constitution. If abortion is a big democrat issue in 2024, meh. Majority rules, we'll see.
Should be a high voter turnout election.

2. Democrats approve of barbaric late term abortions because 8 fucking democrat states allow them. You can't deny that FACT.

3. Democrats ARE exposing children to deviant behaviors, by books like "Gender Queer" and drag shows. That needs to stop.

4. Pantheist: an atheist with no guts.

5. I hope your are right that there is no hell. But I think you are wrong. If you get the nerve to buy a ghost box you'd find out.

6. Ghost boxes are a very unique experience, confronting the truth is not for the feint hearted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top