- Banned
- #21
Sourcewatch is run by a progressive organization. Be that as it may, the information they posted about the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming was completely correct. They are not an objective source.
Their are objective, academically qualified sources that agree global warming may cause an increase in crop productivity. That information has already been posted. I highly doubt it would reach the magnitude the lead post suggests and there are enormous offsetting affects. But, you don't care about those, do you.
They are excellent in one post. In your next you admit they are run by the left fringe.
They are dismissed as objective judgements of political tiesr. They could still be right about tying this OP to funding from energy sources. Doesnt matter....
I didn't say there were "excellent". I said they were correct. I will admit, I was unaware of the partisanship of the organization's owners. Now I am. Paddy (and you) however, seem unwilling to admit the partisanship of the source being referenced in the lead post in this thread. Where is the peer-reviewed study that would support their contention? It doesn't exist because no such study has ever come to the noted conclusion.