Stop-and-Frisk Practice Violated Rights, Judge Rules

[TruthOut10]

In a repudiation of a major element in the Bloomberg administration’s crime-fighting legacy, a federal judge has found that the stop-and-frisk tactics of the New York Police Department violated the constitutional rights of tens of thousands of New Yorkers, and called for a federal monitor to oversee broad reforms.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/n...ts-judge-rules.html?emc=edit_na_20130812&_r=0

 

[Katzndogz]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

 

[TruthOut10]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

"She noted that about 88 percent of the stops result in the police letting the person go without an arrest or ticket, a percentage so high, she said, that it suggests there was not a credible suspicion to suspect the person of criminality in the first place. "

Try reading the whole article next time before just posting just to post. She based her decision on the FACTS. Doesn't have nothing to do with being a Liberal Judge or not.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

A judge wants the constitution to be upheld.

The Horrors!!!!!!!

 

[speck]

In a repudiation of a major element in the Bloomberg administration’s crime-fighting legacy, a federal judge has found that the stop-and-frisk tactics of the New York Police Department violated the constitutional rights of tens of thousands of New Yorkers, and called for a federal monitor to oversee broad reforms.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/n...ts-judge-rules.html?emc=edit_na_20130812&_r=0

"She noted that about 88 percent of the stops result in the police letting the person go without an arrest or ticket, a percentage so high, she said, that it suggests there was not a credible suspicion to suspect the person of criminality in the first place."

Certainly needs to be addressed.

 

[hjmick]

What the fuck took them so long?

 

[Coloradomtnman]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

 

[Asclepias]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sort of makes you think there is a lot of truth to the saying "all conservatives may not be racist but all racist are conservatives."

 

[R.C. Christian]

Nice ruling.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sort of makes you think there is a lot of truth to the saying "all conservatives may not be racist but all racist are conservatives."

Is that like "Not all idiots are liberals, but all liberals are idiots?"

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

It's a lie they peddle. They love big government and the authoritarian state when they are the ones who get to control it.

 

[Asclepias]

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sort of makes you think there is a lot of truth to the saying "all conservatives may not be racist but all racist are conservatives."

Is that like "Not all idiots are liberals, but all liberals are idiots?"

Love your AVI

 

[Jarlaxle]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

Are you a MORON or just a FASCIST?

 

[Jarlaxle]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Katz is not a conservative. She is an AUTHORITARIAN.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Another liberal judge wants more crime. So, he shall have it.

I thought Conservatives were the trur defenders of the Constitution and hated Big Brother government?

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Sort of makes you think there is a lot of truth to the saying "all conservatives may not be racist but all racist are conservatives."

Anyone who "thinks" that statement is anything but stupid is dumb as a box of hair!

 

[whitehall]

Bloomie called it a "crime fighting tool" and it was except that it was unconstitutional. Any first year law student will tell you that it's a violation of the Constitution to search someone without due cause. The crime fighters forgot the rules.

 

[ScienceRocks]

If 70% of crime is caused by blacks...Shouldn't 70% of arrest and resources be directed in that direction?