Stigma of Atheism

[PostmodernProph]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

 

[Truman123]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

 

[PostmodernProph]

What is sick is trying to prevent a poor woman who wants an abortion from being able to get one quick and cheap.

hard to imagine anything worse than killing children.......unless its someone claiming its not only a good thing, its a "RIGHT".......

You are right. This woman should have had an abortion and this kid wouldn't have been tortured and neglected for 7 years and then killed.

Detroit boy 7 dies malnourished bruised mother boyfriend arrested News - Home

Ask his mom why she didn't put him up for adoption.

excellent question.....but it doesn't change the fact she shouldn't have killed him earlier OR later.....

 

[PostmodernProph]

I would consider killing your children to be more stupid......

Then if YOU are ever in that situation then that's what YOU can do.

as a 63 year old man, its not likely.....

Then really it shouldn't matter what you, me or the hundreds of 63 year old men in Congress think either. This should be left up to women and most of them want abortion to remain safe and legal.

why shouldn't it be up to the unborn children?......they're the ones who are impacted the most......

Ok lets have the baby, raise him or her till they can talk and then ask them if they want to be aborted.

precisely......

 

[PostmodernProph]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

the part proven by science?......of course.....didn't you realize that before?.......now, about those parts that science HASN'T proven......

 

[Hollie]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

the part proven by science?......of course.....didn't you realize that before?.......now, about those parts that science HASN'T proven......

Like many fundamentalists, you see any gap in science as a crack to spackle with your gawds. It's surprising just how small those cracks are.

Your gawds of the cracks have been jammed into smaller and smaller cracks as science and knowledge have left less and less room for literal rendering of Ark tales, talking snakes and magical realms.

 

[sealybobo]

What is sick is trying to prevent a poor woman who wants an abortion from being able to get one quick and cheap.

hard to imagine anything worse than killing children.......unless its someone claiming its not only a good thing, its a "RIGHT".......

You are right. This woman should have had an abortion and this kid wouldn't have been tortured and neglected for 7 years and then killed.

Detroit boy 7 dies malnourished bruised mother boyfriend arrested News - Home

Ask his mom why she didn't put him up for adoption.

excellent question.....but it doesn't change the fact she shouldn't have killed him earlier OR later.....

Better to go get a cheap safe abortion than do what she did. Life isn't so precious we need to be worrying about women's unborn fetus'.

 

[sealybobo]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

the part proven by science?......of course.....didn't you realize that before?.......now, about those parts that science HASN'T proven......

Like many fundamentalists, you see any gap in science as a crack to spackle with your gawds. It's surprising just how small those cracks are.

Your gawds of the cracks have been jammed into smaller and smaller cracks as science and knowledge have left less and less room for literal rendering of Ark tales, talking snakes and magical realms.

Either that or they give deep philosophical reasons for why their must be a god. That's it! That's why they believe. Because there MUST BE! No proof needed.

Doesn't even bother the theists who reject all organized religions. Even though they know all that is made up, they still can't believe so is god. They can't think logically or rationally on this. They are thinking with their hearts not their brains.

Using ‘god’ to explain something explains nothing. They say "God’s powers and how they work are a mystery". An explanation is intended to clarify and extend knowledge. Attributing a phenomenon to the magical powers of a supernatural being does neither. Worse still, this presumption acts to prevent any deeper investigation, being little more than a form of blissful ignorance.

 

[sealybobo]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

the part proven by science?......of course.....didn't you realize that before?.......now, about those parts that science HASN'T proven......

God of the gaps. I find it amazing you guys can't see it. For thousands of years thunder and glass was from god. As science progressed your god got smaller and smaller until today not one thing we see is "must be god" except for everything according to you guys.

So we went from everything we couldn't explain being "must be god" to today where EVERYTHING is god. Very interesting.

 

[Steven_R]

As I asked in a different thread, if Dover wasn't about using pseudoscience to shoehorn Christianity into the science class, why did the school board use a law firm that bills itself as "the sword and shield for people of faith"?

a much better question.....why did the judge think that abiogenesis was "science".......did no one think to explain it to him?.......

Here's Judge Jones' decision. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/highlights/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf

Show me where the question of abiogenesis is even addressed.

what theory of origins do you believe they will be teaching then?........

You keep moving goalposts. The judge didn't even address abiogenesis, and neither did any of the witnesses or attorneys or the parents or the school board or anyone else associated with the trial. Every biology text aimed at high school kids or freshmen say the same thing when it comes to the origin of life: to wit, "we're not sure but this is what likely happened because of what we do know about physics and biochemistry" and leave the origin of life at that. Evolution, something we are sure of, is what happens next and that is what the trial was about.

then it was in error.....ID is not a competing concept with evolution......it is a competing theory of origin.......

No. ID is a competing hypothesis for the entirely of biology. It says abiogenesis didn't happen because someone or something just deposited life here. It also says evolution isn't true because that same someone or something deposited all the life we see around us exactly as it we see it today; birds with wings, fish with scales, large land mammals, whales. It's a double pronged approach to undermine science and replace it in kid's classrooms with nothing more than Godditit.

Judge Jones rightfully saw ID for what it was and said it's not science and doesn't even come close to science. The trial didn't address abiogenesis, only evolution, but the outcome would be the same.

 

[PostmodernProph]

What is sick is trying to prevent a poor woman who wants an abortion from being able to get one quick and cheap.

hard to imagine anything worse than killing children.......unless its someone claiming its not only a good thing, its a "RIGHT".......

You are right. This woman should have had an abortion and this kid wouldn't have been tortured and neglected for 7 years and then killed.

Detroit boy 7 dies malnourished bruised mother boyfriend arrested News - Home

Ask his mom why she didn't put him up for adoption.

excellent question.....but it doesn't change the fact she shouldn't have killed him earlier OR later.....

Life isn't so precious we need to be worrying about women's unborn fetus'.

does that tell us things about the folks you hang around with?......

 

[PostmodernProph]

It's not a life yet

science prove you a liar.....

So evolution is true?

the part proven by science?......of course.....didn't you realize that before?.......now, about those parts that science HASN'T proven......

God of the gaps. I find it amazing you guys can't see it. For thousands of years thunder and glass was from god. As science progressed your god got smaller and smaller until today not one thing we see is "must be god" except for everything according to you guys.

So we went from everything we couldn't explain being "must be god" to today where EVERYTHING is god. Very interesting.

as opposed to your 'science of the gaps'.....you know you can't prove it, but you proved something yesterday, therefore everything else you believe MUST be true.....

 

[PostmodernProph]

a much better question.....why did the judge think that abiogenesis was "science".......did no one think to explain it to him?.......

Here's Judge Jones' decision. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/highlights/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf

Show me where the question of abiogenesis is even addressed.

what theory of origins do you believe they will be teaching then?........

You keep moving goalposts. The judge didn't even address abiogenesis, and neither did any of the witnesses or attorneys or the parents or the school board or anyone else associated with the trial. Every biology text aimed at high school kids or freshmen say the same thing when it comes to the origin of life: to wit, "we're not sure but this is what likely happened because of what we do know about physics and biochemistry" and leave the origin of life at that. Evolution, something we are sure of, is what happens next and that is what the trial was about.

then it was in error.....ID is not a competing concept with evolution......it is a competing theory of origin.......

No. ID is a competing hypothesis for the entirely of biology.

lol no....the entirety of biology is what the intelligent designer designed.....

 

[Hollie]

Here's Judge Jones' decision. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/highlights/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf

Show me where the question of abiogenesis is even addressed.

what theory of origins do you believe they will be teaching then?........

You keep moving goalposts. The judge didn't even address abiogenesis, and neither did any of the witnesses or attorneys or the parents or the school board or anyone else associated with the trial. Every biology text aimed at high school kids or freshmen say the same thing when it comes to the origin of life: to wit, "we're not sure but this is what likely happened because of what we do know about physics and biochemistry" and leave the origin of life at that. Evolution, something we are sure of, is what happens next and that is what the trial was about.

then it was in error.....ID is not a competing concept with evolution......it is a competing theory of origin.......

No. ID is a competing hypothesis for the entirely of biology.

lol no....the entirety of biology is what the intelligent designer designed.....

All by magic just 6,000 years ago.

 

[Youwerecreated]

What magic was used to fully develop the first cell ? and caused that first cell to go on to form every group of living organisms that has ever existed in only 4.6 billion years.

 

[PostmodernProph]

what theory of origins do you believe they will be teaching then?........

You keep moving goalposts. The judge didn't even address abiogenesis, and neither did any of the witnesses or attorneys or the parents or the school board or anyone else associated with the trial. Every biology text aimed at high school kids or freshmen say the same thing when it comes to the origin of life: to wit, "we're not sure but this is what likely happened because of what we do know about physics and biochemistry" and leave the origin of life at that. Evolution, something we are sure of, is what happens next and that is what the trial was about.

then it was in error.....ID is not a competing concept with evolution......it is a competing theory of origin.......

No. ID is a competing hypothesis for the entirely of biology.

lol no....the entirety of biology is what the intelligent designer designed.....

All by magic just 6,000 years ago.

whatever you choose to believe, sweetcheeks......

 

[PostmodernProph]

What magic was used to fully develop the first cell ? and caused that first cell to go on to form every group of living organisms that has ever existed in only 4.6 billion years.

sorry....there is no magic capable of causing a single celled organism to change into a multicelled organism.......Hollie has to be wrong about that one......

 

[Hollie]

What magic was used to fully develop the first cell ? and caused that first cell to go on to form every group of living organisms that has ever existed in only 4.6 billion years.

sorry....there is no magic capable of causing a single celled organism to change into a multicelled organism.......Hollie has to be wrong about that one......

No magic is required.

Come on. Tell us about the talking snakes.

 

[PostmodernProph]

What magic was used to fully develop the first cell ? and caused that first cell to go on to form every group of living organisms that has ever existed in only 4.6 billion years.

sorry....there is no magic capable of causing a single celled organism to change into a multicelled organism.......Hollie has to be wrong about that one......

No magic is required.
.

well science certainly isn't involved or you would have been able to show it by now......

 

[Hollie]

What magic was used to fully develop the first cell ? and caused that first cell to go on to form every group of living organisms that has ever existed in only 4.6 billion years.

sorry....there is no magic capable of causing a single celled organism to change into a multicelled organism.......Hollie has to be wrong about that one......

No magic is required.
.

well science certainly isn't involved or you would have been able to show it by now......

Magic is not a process that is required in science or biology. In the worldview of you YEC'ists, science is not a requirement at all. Science, biology, chemistry, etc. are irrelevant when magical gawds *poofed* all of existence just 6,000 years ago.

Something as fragile and as prone to evolutionary forces as cell structure actually confounds your views for designer gawds. Cell biology actually suggests your gawds are incompetent designers.

You and the other groupies at Harun Yahya should present your data supporting a 6,000 year old earth to peer reviewed publication such as the journal Nature.

Keep us in the loop as to how that goes.